Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Terapan Ilmu Keolahragaan (JTIKOR), issued twice a year, accepts for publication articles in sports sciences including:

  1. sports technology;
  2. sports engineering;
  3. sports medicine;
  4. exercise physiology;
  5. sports biomechanics;
  6. sports sociology; and
  7. sports psychology.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

All published articles in Jurnal Terapan Ilmu Keolahragaan, the manuscript must be passed through an editorial review. 

Submitted manuscript in Jurnal Terapan Ilmu Keolahragaan will be checked in term of writing guideline by the editorial team. After an initial check by editors for writing guideline, articles are then sent to 2 reviewers assigned by the editor in chief to evaluate for the feasibility of the content, focus, materials & methods, result & discussion, and conclusion.

After comments and suggestions from reviewers are received, the article then will be sent back to the author to make the revision. The author should facilitate all notes from reviewers. After re-submission by the author, The approval of re-submitted articles will be discussed at the meeting of the editorial team.

The editorial team is responsible for making a decision whether articles is appropriate to be published or not. The editorial team can be guided by a policy board of editorial team and is limited by law as to be enforced regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Regarding the plagiarism, the editorial team will be used plagiarism checker and Google Scholar network.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statements

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

(Based on Elsevier recommendations and COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The publication of an article in the peer-reviewed journals published by Faculty of Sport and Health Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia is a process of permanent knowledge improvement. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society of society-owned or sponsored journals.

The Language Center, Indonesia University of Education takes their duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.

We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful to editors.

Duties of authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another's paper as the author's own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.

Acknowledgement of sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and human or animal subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Duties of editors

Publication decisions

The editor of a peer-reviewed journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published, often working in conjunction with the relevant society (for society-owned or sponsored journals). The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers (or society officers) in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other members of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing for interest.

 

Author(s) Guidlines

  1. Naskah tulisan yang diajukan untuk dimuat dalam Jurnal Terapan Ilmu Keolahragaan harus orisinil, karya sendiri, dan bebas dari plagiasi.
  2. Tulisan belum pernah dan atau tidak sedang dalam proses pengajuan untuk dipublikasikan di media selain Jurnal Terapan Ilmu Keolahragaan.
  3. Naskah ditulis dalam Bahasa Indonesia dengan mengikuti article template yang telah disediakan, jumlah kata antara 4.000 sampai 7.000 kata, tidak termasuk daftar pustaka. 
  4. Abstrak disertakan dalam Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris. Absrak ditulis tidak lebih dari 200 kata dengan menyertakan 4-6 kata kunci.
  5. Penulis yang menyerahkan naskah tulisan ke Redaksi Jurnal Terapan Ilmu Keolahragaan menyetujui hak mengkopi artikel secara utuh berada di Redaksi.
  6. Subjudul yang digunakan adalah Pendahuluan, Metode, Hasil dan Pembahasan, Kesimpulan.
  7. Isi naskah jurnal terdiri dari beberapa bagian utama yang terdiri atas:

Judul

Judul memberikan gambaran isi artikel. Jumlah kata judul 8-14 kata. 

Abstrak

Abstrak ditulis menggunakan Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris. Jumlah kata pada setiap versi di dalam abstrak tidak lebih dari 200 kata dengan menyertakan 4- 6 kata kunci.

Pendahuluan 

Pendahuluan dianjurkan mengikuti teknik tiga bagian. Bagian pertama memuat urgensi atau pentingnya masalah yang diteliti. Bagian selanjutnya memuat parade penelitian sebelumnya yang relevan dengan topik penelitian. Bagian Terakhir memuat rumusan masalah dan tujuan penelitian yang diangkat.

Metode 

Pada bagian metode, ungkapan secara jelas metode penelitian yang digunakan, subjek penelitian, instrumen penelitian dan teknik analisis.

Hasil dan Pembahasan 

Bagian ini memberikan penjelasan mengenai hasil penelitian lapangan (temuan lapangan) yang telah dilakukan. Hasil penelitian ditulis dengan menggunakan narasi dan dapat didukung dengan tabel dan atau gambar. Penulisan hasil penelitian tidak dianjurkan menggunakan dot points atau teknik penulisan pengabjadan. Hasil penelitian yang ditampilkan selanjutnya dibahas apakah sesuai dengan teori atau hasil penelitian sebelumnya.

Kesimpulan 

Uraikan kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian sertakan pula rekomendasi bagi peneliti selanjutnya.

Daftar Pustaka

Daftar pustaka menggunakan format APA (American Psycological Assosiation) edisi ke-VI. Penulisan dibantu refference manager software mendeley. https://www.mendeley.com/download-mendeley-desktop/

 

Article Template

Article yang disubmit ke JTIKOR harus sesuai dengan template di bawah ini:

 

Fees

JTIKOR does not charge any submission or processing fees for every article received and published.