Yasmin Nindya Chaerunissa


Gender issues have become a global agenda nowadays, where the inequality can make one of the parties, which in this case is women, discredited. Education, included history education of course, should be as one of the agents that can contribute to solve of gender problems. Based on social reconstruction philosophy, history education does not only talk about the past, but also relate to the present, and see the future. In this context, the history learning is made to be oriented in gender equality. The research location is on SMA Negeri 5 Bandung, class of social science. There are three main results in this research. First, to create a history learning that oriented to gender equality, the most important thing is that the teacher should have a deep understanding about it. It is fine whether the teacher is a man or woman, because gender equality is not only for woman, but for making a more equitable social order. History learning which oriented on gender equality could be delivered by its process and content. Second, on its implementation, history learning that could accommodate gender equality’s values is contextual learning. Teacher should be clever enough to make connection between the past and the present. It should be done dialogically. Discussion might be made through question and answer which bridged with gender issues emancipatory critical questions. It could help the students shape their own thought and direct which values that suit into them. Third, through this kind of construction, it resulted that students’ perception about gender equality developed. The students placed basically man and woman is in an equal partnership, where any kind of chances are open equally for both. It happened also friction about domestic role is not only for woman again, but as shared responsibility. Concluded, history learning could contribute in cultivating of gender equality, as a part to develop the social justice.

Kata Kunci

social reconstruction, gender equality, dialogical learning


Blackburn, S. (2004). Women and the state in modern Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brooks & Brooks. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivistic classrooms. Virginia: ASCD.

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Research design: Pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

de Beauvoir, S. (1989). The second sex. New York: Vintage Book.

Evans, R.W. & Brodkey, J. (1996). An issues-centered curriculum for high school social studies. Dalam R.W. Evans & D.W. Saxe, Handbook of teaching social studies (hlm. 254-264). Washington: National Council for the Social Studies.

Fakih, M. (2013). Analisis gender dan transformasi sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Gandhi, L. (2001). Teori poskolonial: Upaya meruntuhkan hegemoni barat. Yogyakarta: Qalam.

Hasan, S.H. (2012). Filosofi dan peran pendidikan sejarah untuk membangun karakter bangsa. Dalam S.H. Hasan, Pendidikan sejarah Indonesia: Isu dalam ide dan pembelajaran (hlm. 1-16). Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Horgan, D.D. (1995). Achieving gender equity: Strategies for the classroom. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

Johnson, E.B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it's here to stay. California: Corwin Press.

Knight, G.R. (2009). Filsafat pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Gama Media.

Lee, P.J. (2005). Putting into practice: Understanding history. Dalam M.S. Donovan & J.D. Bransford (Penyunting), How students learn history in the classroom (hlm. 31-78). Washington DC: The National Academy Press.

Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic-inquiry. London: SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L.J. (2011). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Saha, L.J. (2011). Sociology of education. Dalam T.L. Good, 21st century education: A reference handbook (hlm. 299-307). London: SAGE Publications.

Sanjaya, W. (2008). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran: Teori dan praktik pengembangan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sapiro, V. (2005). Subjek yang sama berlanjut. Dalam J. Losco & L. Williams, Political Theory: Kajian klasik dan konteporer (hlm. 417-442). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Saputra, Wr.H. (2007). Pendidikan berperspektif gender di Indonesia. Historia. Journal of Historical Studies, 8, (1), hlm. 45-60.

Supriatna, N. (2007). Desain pembelajaran sejarah yang berorientasi pada masalah-masalah sosial kontemporer. Dalam N. Supriatna (Penyunting), Konstruksi pembelajaran sejarah kritis (hlm. 117-128). Bandung: Historia Utama Press.

Supriatna, N. (2011). Konstruksi pembelajaran sejarah yang berorientasi pada masalah kontemporer pembangunan. Mimbar. Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 27, (1), hlm. 21-30.

Supriatna, N. (2012). Pengunaan konsep ilmu sosial dalam konstruksi pembelajaran sejarah kritis. Paramita. Jurnal Sejarah dan Pembelajaran Sejarah, 22, (1), hlm. 122-130.

Thornham, S. (2000). Teori feminis dan cultural studies: Tentang relasi yang belum terselesaikan. Yogyakarya: Jalasutra.

Wood, J.T. (1994). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture. California: Wadsworth.


  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.