SOURCE-BASED WRITING AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS: PERSPECTIVE AND CHALLENGES

Velayeti Nurfitriana Ansas, Didi Sukyadi

Abstract


The level of scientific publications of Indonesian students at the international level is still very minimal. Even when compared to Malaysia and Thailand, Indonesia is still lagging behind. The Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education targets that in 2019 Indonesia will reach 30,000 international publications. Therefore, students' interest in writing must be increased, especially writing based on sources. Therefore, this study would like to find students' perspectives and perceived challenges in writing based on sources. This research was based on a case study.  The research involved 68 students from one of the state universities in Bandung, and it analyzed 20 selected scientific papers written by students. The instruments for data collection included questionnaire and observation. The results of this study found that 59% of students perceived that writing scientific papers is very difficult. The students found it difficult to find suitable sources for writing material and develop their ideas. They tended to use articles as the sources from the internet whose originality is unclear. One reason this happens was because 80% of students did not know where to find or get indexed journals to use as references for their writing. In addition, many students also preferred not to use journals that were majorly English-based because of their limitation of English skills. The implication is that students should be given further understanding of how to access journals and use reference sources in writing. It is expected that every lecturer will give more source-based writing assignments so that the ability of students to write and develop ideas based on existing sources can be further improved.

Keywords


scientific paper, source-based writing, teaching writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alister, C., Conttia, L., & Hyeyoon, C. (2016). Students' writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47-58.

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui K., & James M. (2005). Differences in written discourse in writing-only and reading-to-write prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10, 5-43.

Gebril, A., & Plakans, L. (2016). Source-based tasks in academic writing assessment: Lexical diversity, textual borrowing and proficiency. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.10.001

Gholami, J., & Alinasab, M. (2017). Source-based tasks in writing independent and integrated essays. International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1039a

Guo, L., Crossley, A. S., & McNamara, S. D. (2013). Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing, 18, 218-238. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002.

Hartley, J. (2007). Reading, writing, speaking and listening: Perspectives in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 316-320. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm014.

Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting Reading and Writing In Second Language Writing Instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Hirsch, E.D. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. With an appendix what literate Americans know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341

Hyland, K. (2002). Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing, in J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 115–130). London: Longman.

Kirkpatrick, L. C., & Klein, P. D. (2016). High-achieving high school students’ strategies for writing from internet-based sources of information. Journal of Writing Research, 8(1), 1-46. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.01.

Mansourizadeh, K. & Ahmad U. K. (2011). Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 152–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.004

McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials And Methods in ELT: A Teachers’ Guide. Australia: Blackwell Publishing.

Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 317–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004

Scollon, R., Tsang, W.K., Li, D., Yung, V. & Jones, R., (1998). Voice, appropriation and discourse representation in student writing task. Linguistics and Education 9(3), 227–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(97)90001-2

Seftiawan, D. (August 1, 2017). Jumlah publikasi ilmiah Indonesia peringkat 3 ASEAN. Pikiran Rakyat. Retrieved from: http://www.pikiran- rakyat.com/pendidikan/2017/08/01/jumlah-publikasi-ilmiah-indonesia-peringkat-3-asean-406475

Sormunen, E., Heinström, J., Romu, L., & Turunen, R. (2012). A method for the analysis of information use in source-based writing. Information Research, 17(4), paper 535. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/17-4/paper535.htmlSormunen,E.,&Lehtiö,L.(2011).AuthoringWikipediaarticlesasaninformationliteracyassignment–copy-pastingorexpressingnewunderstandinginone’sownwords?InformationResearch,16(4).Retrievedfromhttp://informationr.net/ir/164/paper503.html

Sormunen, E., Tanni, M., Alamettala, T., & Heinstrom, J. (2014). Students' group work strategies in source‐based writing assignments. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Thechnology, 65(6), 1217-1231.

Warnick, B., & Inch, E. S. (1989). Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in argument. New York: Macmillan.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i2.14757

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Velayeti Nurfitriana Ansas, Didi Sukyadi



Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.