Penggunaan Formula Grafik Fry untuk Menganalisis Keterbacaan Wacana Mahasiswa PGSD

Panca Pertiwi Hidayati, Arifin Ahmad, Feby Inggriyani

Abstract


Elementary school teacher candidates should be able to develop good teaching materials based on student’s age they teach. In fact, it is frequently found that elementary school teacher candidates write their papers only by copying from books or the internet. It is rarely found that they are able to develop and synthesize the materials they cited with their own vocabulary in their paper. The purpose of this study is to describe the benefits of using the Fry graph formula in analyzing the legibility of materials of PGSD students works which is made for elementary school teaching materials. This study used the descriptive qualitative method. The results of the data analysis revealed student discourse that is not appropriate because of the lower level of legibility is 4 discourses (13.33%), which appropriate to its legibility is 8 discourses (26.67%), and those that are not appropriate because the higher level of legibility is 18 discourses (60%).


Keywords


fry graph; readability; student materials

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aji, N. (2008). Jejak Menulis. [Online]. Tersedia:http://Kiftiya.Blogspot.Com/2008/07/keterbacaan readibility.html. [21 Februari 2018].

Fadilah, R. & Mintowati, M. (2015). Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia SMP dan SMA Kurikulum 2013 Terbitan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 2014. Jurnal Pena Indonesia (JPI), 1(1), 26–49.

Harjasujana, A. S. & Yeti, M. (1997). Membaca 2. Jakarta: Proyek Pengadaan Buku PGSM Dikti.

Hayon, J. (2007). Membaca dan Menulis Wacana. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Iswara, P. (2016). PENGEMBANGAN MATERI AJAR DAN EVALUASI PADA KETERAMPILAN MENDENGARKAN DAN MEMBACA. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 89-97. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v3i1.2359.

Laksono, K. (2008). Membaca 2. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Nuryani. (2016). Tingkat Keterbacaan Soal Wacana Ujian Nasional (UN) Tingkat SMA Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 1(3), 299-308.

Payani, D. dkk. (2003). The Readability Level of the EFL Text and The Reading Comprehension. Lingua: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(5). 43-54.

Pramuwibowo, A.B. (2015). Keterbacaan Teks dalam Buku “Bahasa Indonesia Wahana Pengetahuan”. Jurnal Pena Indonesia (JPI), 1(2), 240–259.

Suherli. (2008). Keterbacaan Buku Teks Pelajaran. [Online]. Tersedia:http://suherlicentre.blogspot.com/2008/07/keterbacaan-buku-tekspelajaran.html. [15 April 2018].

Tarigan, H.G. (2009). Pengajaran Wacana. Bandung: Angkasa.

Yasa, K. N. (2013). Kecermatan Formula Keterbacaan Sebagai Penentu Keefektifan Teks. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 46 (3), 238-245.

Yoce, A. (2009). Analisis Wacana Kritis. Bandung: Yrama.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v5i2.11496

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Mimbar Sekolah Dasar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats

MSD has been indexed in various libraries: