Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum for Science Learning

Ana Rohmatulloh, Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo, Haryo Aji Pambudi

Abstract


This research aims at describing the 2013 Curriculum implementation for science learning on the planning, classroom implementation, and assessment stages, as well as the obstacles faced by teachers and their efforts to overcome them. This qualitative research was by involving Grade 4 teachers, students, and the principal of a primary school in Yogyakarta as the research subjects. The research object was the activities carried out in the curriculum implementation. The data collection instruments include observation sheets, interview guidelines, questionnaires, and analysis guidelines. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The data validity was tested using triangulation techniques. The research found that the planning stage include studying the syllabus and teacher’s books then outlining the steps of the activities with the scientific approach; the teachers had integrated the science learning with other subjects under a theme; and the scientific approach was employed through observing, questioning, experimenting, associating/reasoning, and communicating. However, the overall implementation of the 2013 Curriculum had not been optimal yet. The teachers had used authentic assessment to assess the students' attitudes, knowledge, and skills, but they rarely used assessment instruments and rubrics. The obstacles faced by teachers were in the planning, classroom implementation, and assessment stages.


Keywords


2013 Curriculum Implementation; Primary School; Science Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akınoğlu, O. (2008). Assessment of the Inquiry-Based Project Implementation Process In Science Education Upon Students’ Points of Views. International Journal of Instruction, 1(1), 1-12.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Daryanto. (2014). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Debara. (2014). Why Integrative Learning? Why Now? Retrieved from ProQuest documentreport,Information,from,ProQuest.s://www.google.com/search?q=ProQuest+document+link&oqProQuest+document+link&aqs=chrome..69i57.4655j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-826 September 2014 19:19.file:///E:/journal%202/journal%2014.pdf.

Evrekli, E,. & Balım, A. G. (2010). Effects of mind map and concept strips use in science and technology education on students’ academic achievement and perception of inquiry learning skills. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Journal, 1(2), 76-98.

Fadillah, M. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Pembelajaran SD/MI,. SD/MTS, dan SMA/MA. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz. Faridah Alawiyah.

Hamrin, Merril & Melanie Toth. (2012). Pembelajaran Aktif yang Menginspirasi: Buku Pegangan Lengkap untuk Masa Kini. (Alih Bahasa: Bethari Anissa Ismayasari). Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21 Kunci Sukses Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Permendikbud, Nomor 160, Tahun 2013, tentang Kurikulum 2006 dan Kurikulum 2013.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 67, Tahun 2013, tentang Kurikulum SD.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Permendikbud, Nomor 66, Tahun 2013, tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.

Kemdikbud. (2014). Permendikbud, Nomor 103, Tahun 2013, tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.

McNeill, K. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823.

McDonald, C. V. (2010) The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, DOI 10.1002/tea.20377.

Mihladiz and Duran. (2014). Views of Elementary Education Students Related To Science and Technology Teaching Process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141 (2014) 290 – 297.

Rubini (2016). Identify Scientific Literacy From The Science Teachers’ Perspective. Science Education Program, Postgraduate Program Pakuan University, Bogor, Indonesia.

Rusman. (2011). Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Simsekli. (2015). An Implementation to Raise Environmental Awareness Of Elementary Education Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 ( 2015 ) 222 – 226.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sagala, Syaiful. (2013). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sani, Abdullah Ridwan. (2014). Pembelajaran Saintifik untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Santrock, John W. (2002). Life-Span Development: Perkembangan Masa Hidup, Edisi 5, Jilid II. (Alih Bahasa: Juda Damanik dan Achmad Chusairi). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: ALFABETA.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.15912

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Ana Rohmatulloh, Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo & Haryo Aji Pambudi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats

MSD has been indexed in various libraries: