Relativity of Peers: Learning Efficiency of Secondary Students

Al M. Lolos, Annerill P. Lorio, Caryll L. Martinez, Hassanal P. Abusama, Khalid Yasper M. Tangkli, Mary Nelle Jireh S. Falsario, Zaira Aleiah Kim F. Consebit


This study aimed to know how peers can take over a secondary student’s learning efficiency and if this relation is that cohesive. To gather data for the study, interviews, with the use of guide questionnaires, were conducted with the participants selected through purposive sampling. Data collected were analyzed through thematic analysis. The participants were five (5) secondary students of Sultan Kudarat State University – Laboratory Science High School. This study shows that the following points were made: (1) There are a lot of ways peers can assert changes to a student’s academic performance. These can be manifested through all the statements that the participants gave to the researchers; (2) A larger number of peers can easily get a student persuaded in doing activities unrelated to their academics; (3) The length of friendship between the peers and the student matters by means of the cohesiveness of peers on the learning efficiency of a student; (4) The affiliation of peers toward the learning efficiency of students is very enormous that it plays a vital role in the things that could happen to a student’s learning at school and everywhere; (5) There are tendencies that peers can’t affect a student’s learning efficiency. These conclusions can be of help to students, parents, teachers and future researchers.


Adolescence; Efficiency; Influence; Learning; Peer; Student

Full Text:



Ahmad, C. V. (2021a). Causes of students’ reluctance to participate in classroom discussions. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 1(1), 47-62.

Ahmad, C. V. (2021b) College Students' Perspective Towards Lecturers' Work Ethics. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(1), 27-30.

Betts, Julian R., and Jamie L. Shkolnik. (2010). The Effects of Ability Grouping on Student Achievement and Resource Allocation in Secondary Schools. Economics of Education Review, 19, 1–15.

Bilad, M. R. and Prayogi, S. (2021). Portfolio Workbook as an Effective Method for Student-Centered Learning of Chemical Engineering Principles. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 1(1), 31-36.

Bittner, E. A. C., and Leimeister, J. M. (2014). Creating shared understanding in heterogeneous work groups: Why it matters and how to achieve it. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(1), 111-144.

Carrell, Scott E., Bruce I. Sacerdote, and James E. West. (2013). From natural variation to optimal policy? the importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica, 81(3), 855–882.

Greer, J. E., Mccalla, G., Collins, J. A., Kumar, V. S., Meagher, P., and Vassileva, J. (1998). Supporting peer help and collaboration in distributed workplace environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 9, 159-177.

Lewis, C. (1978). Adolescence and youth: Psychological development in a changing world. PsycCRITIQUES, 23(1), 45.

Liu, C. H., and Matthews, R. (2005). Vygotsky's Philosophy: Constructivism and Its Criticisms Examined. International Education Journal, 6(3), 386-399.

Jindal, R., Leekha, M., Manuja, M., and Goswami, M. (2020). What makes a better companion? towards social and engaging peer learning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IOS Press, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 1-8.

Jizat, N. A. M., and Sulong, M. S. (2021). Lecturer perspective on informal learning activities. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(1), 23-26.

Kimbrough, E. O., Mcgee, A. and Shigeoka, H. (2017). How do peers impact learning? An experimental investigation of peer-to peer teaching and ability tracking. National Bureau of Economic Research, ,16-31 (, retrieved on 10 April 2021).

Maryanti, R., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Hufad, A., and Sunardi, S. (2021). Science education for students with special needs in indonesia: From definition, systematic review, education system, to curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 1(1), 1-8.

Müller, C. M., Hofmann, V., Begert, T., and Cillessen, A. H. (2018). Peer influence on disruptive classroom behavior depends on teachers' instructional practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 56(2018), 99-108.

Samantray, A., and Riccaboni, M. (2020). Peer influence of production and consumption behaviour in an online social network of collective learning. Online Social Networks and Media, 18, 100088.

Sari, N. M., and Faiz, N. S. M. (2021). Internationalisation of Higher Education: The Activity–Process Approach at Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(1), 7-10.

Steinberg, L., and Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531.

Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., and May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31-56.

You, S. (2011). Peer influence and adolescents’ school engagement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29(2011), 829-835.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 1970 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education (AJSEE) is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)