A Comparative Evaluation of State-of-the-Art Deep Face Recognition Models on the Indonesian Muslim Student Face Dataset

Mokhamad Arfan Wicaksono, brahim Faizal Burhan, Hadi Permana, Muhung Anggarawan, Bakhriyah Firdausi, Amrullah Muhammad Rafid, Ratnasari Nur Rohmah

Abstract


Face recognition systems have achieved remarkable accuracy on standard Western-centric benchmarks, yet their performance on demographically diverse populations remains underexplored. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of six state-of-the-art deep face recognition models on the Indonesian Muslim Student Face Dataset (IMSFD), which features 26,760 face images of 68 identities captured under varying conditions including the presence of hijab and other head coverings. We evaluate FaceNet (VGGFace2 and CASIA-WebFace variants), AdaFace (ResNet-50 and ResNet-100), MagFace (ResNet-100), and ElasticFace-Arc (ResNet-100) under closed-set identification and face verification protocols. Our evaluation encompasses cumulative match characteristic curves up to rank-20, receiver operating characteristic and detection error trade-off analysis, equal error rate, decidability index ($d'$), true accept rate at multiple false accept rate operating points, per-subset and per-identity analysis, inference speed benchmarking, and computational cost profiling including parameter counts, floating-point operations, and GPU memory consumption. Statistical significance is established via bootstrap 95\% confidence intervals and pairwise McNemar's tests. Results show that AdaFace-R50 achieves the highest rank-1 identification rate of 91.70\% (95\% CI: [90.98\%, 92.38\%]), followed by AdaFace-R100 at 91.32\%, while all pairwise model differences are statistically significant ($p < 0.05$). Notably, substantial performance variation across dataset subsets reveals that recognition difficulty is highly dependent on capture conditions, with subset A2 achieving near-perfect accuracy ($\geq$99.40\%) and subset B1 posing the greatest challenge ($\leq$86.05\%). These findings provide empirical evidence for the need to evaluate face recognition systems on diverse, non-Western datasets and highlight the relative strengths of modern margin-based loss functions for challenging demographic groups.

Keywords


face recognition; deep learning; comparative evaluation; Indonesian faces; angular margin loss; biometric performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boutros, F., Damer, N., Kirchbuchner, F., Kuijper, A., 2022. ElasticFace: Elastic margin loss for deep face recognition. Proc. CVPRW, pp. 1578–1587. doi:10.1109/CVPRW56347.2022.00164.

Buolamwini, J., Gebru, T., 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proc. FAT*, PMLR, pp. 77–91.

Cao, Q., Shen, L., Xie, W., Parkhi, O.M., Zisserman, A., 2018. VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and age. Proc. IEEE FG, pp. 67–74. doi:10.1109/FG.2018.00020.

Chopra, S., Hadsell, R., LeCun, Y., 2005. Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification. Proc. CVPR, pp. 539–546. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2005.202.

Deng, J., Guo, J., Xue, N., Zafeiriou, S., 2019. ArcFace: Additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition. Proc. CVPR, pp. 4690–4699. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2019.00482.

Grother, P., Ngan, M., Hanaoka, K., 2019. Face recognition vendor test (FRVT) part 3: Demographic effects. NIST Interagency Report 8280, 1–82. doi:10.6028/NIST.IR.8280.

He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J., 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proc. CVPR, pp. 770–778. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.

Huang, G.B., Ramesh, M., Berg, T., Learned-Miller, E., 2007. Labeled faces in the wild: A database for studying face recognition in unconstrained environments. Technical Report 07-49, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1–11.

Kemelmacher-Shlizerman, I., Seitz, S.M., Miller, D., Brossard, E., 2016. The MegaFace benchmark: 1 million faces for recognition at scale. Proc. CVPR, pp. 4873–4882. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.527.

Kim, M., Jain, A.K., Liu, X., 2022. AdaFace: Quality adaptive margin for face recognition. Proc. CVPR, pp. 18750–18759. doi:10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01819.

Liu, W., Wen, Y., Yu, Z., Li, M., Raj, B., Song, L., 2017. SphereFace: Deep hypersphere embedding for face recognition. Proc. CVPR, pp. 6738–6746. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2017.713.

McNemar, Q., 1947. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12, 153–157. doi:10.1007/BF02295996.

Meng, Q., Zhao, S., Huang, Z., Zhou, F., 2021. MagFace: A universal representation for face recognition and quality assessment. Proc. CVPR, pp. 14225–14234. doi:10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01400.

Parkhi, O.M., Vedaldi, A., Zisserman, A., 2015. Deep face recognition. Proc. BMVC, pp. 41.1–41.12. doi:10.5244/C.29.41.

Purnawansyah, P., Wibawa, A.P., Widyaningtyas, T., Haviluddin, H., Darwis, H., Azis, H., Ali, Z., 2023. Indonesian muslim student face dataset (IMSFD). doi:10.17632/f6f3y6ndgw.1.

Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., Philbin, J., 2015. FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. Proc. CVPR, pp. 815–823. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298682.

Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., Alemi, A., 2017. Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning. Proc. AAAI, pp. 4278–4284. doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231.

Wang, H., Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., Ji, X., Gong, D., Zhou, J., Li, Z., Liu, W., 2018. CosFace: Large margin cosine loss for deep face recognition. Proc. CVPR, pp. 5265–5274. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2018.00552.

Wang, M., Deng, W., 2021. Deep face recognition: A survey. Neurocomputing 429, 215–244. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.081.

Yi, D., Lei, Z., Liao, S., Li, S.Z., 2014. Learning face representation from scratch. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.7923. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1411.7923.

Zeng, D., Veldhuis, R., Spreeuwers, L., 2021. A survey of face recognition techniques under occlusion. IET Biometrics 10, 581–606. doi:10.1049/bme2.12029.

Zhu, Z., Huang, G., Deng, J., et al., 2021. WebFace260M: A benchmark unveiling the power of million-scale deep face recognition. Proc. CVPR, pp. 10492–10502. doi:10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01035.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/coelite.v5i1.98428

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Computer Engineering, Electronics and Information Technology (COELITE)


is published by UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA (UPI),
and managed by Department of Computer Enginering.
Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Kota Bandung, Indonesia - 40154
email: [email protected]
e-ISSN: 2829-4149
p-ISSN: 2829-4157
Owner: OBS

https://poltekkesjakut.org/

https://poltekkeskalteng.org/

nana4d

https://poltekkessulsel.org/

https://poltekkesjaksel.org/

slot88

slot88

slot88

nana4d

nana4d

https://processoseletivo.fumec.br/

rokokbet

https://sigindonesia.com/

nana4d

slot88

https://jimki.bapin.or.id/

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

slot thailand

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

himpsi

himpsi

himpsi

himpsi

chope

mayora

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

matauangslot

barbartoto

toto777

barbartoto

toto777

barbartoto

barbartoto

toto777

toto777

toto777

barbartoto

toto777

toto777

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto

barbartoto