Ahmad Furqon


The teacher's understanding of CPD is still very low. The main objective of this research is to obtain a picture of school-based teacher development through PLC in the continuous professional development in schools.

The research method used is qualitative method. Pre-field includes literature review and field survey. Phase of field work, researcher entered the field in order to collect data. In the data analysis phase the researcher conducts a series of qualitative data analysis process up to the interpretation of the data. In addition, the process of data triangulation compared with library theory. While the evaluation and reporting stage conducted consultation and guidance and reporting of research results.

The research findings indicate that the elements of PLC forming are commitment, responsibility, usefulness, collaboration collegial, as well as school culture and climate. While the role of the principal in this PLC is as an instructional leader, motivator, and facilitator. The conclusion of the research shows that PLC is able to promote CPD which leads to improving the quality of learning service.

Full Text:



Ailwood, J., Branch, N. B., & Queensland, E. (2001). Developing Teacher Professional Learning Communities : The Case of Education Queensland Kirran Follers.

Aylsworth, A. J. (2012). Professional learning communities: An analysis of teacher participation in a PLC and the relationship with student academic achievement. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 122.

Avalos, B. 2011. Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education Over Ten Years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20.

Bollam, R., et al. (2005). Creating and Sustaining Effective Professional Learning. Research Report. University of Bristol, Bath, and London, Institute of Education: UK.

Cormier, R., & Olivier, D. F. (2009). Professional Learning Commites: Characteristics, Principals, and Teachers.

Cranston, J. (2009). Holding the Reins of the Professional Learning Community: Eight Themes from Research on Principals’ Perceptions of Professional Learning Communities. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 90(2002), 1–22.

Danim,S. (2013). Profesionalisasi dan Etika Profesi Guru. Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta

Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D.J, et al. 2005. Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42) 16-17,20.

Darling-Hammond, L. & Richardson, N. 2009. Research Review. Teacher Learning: What Matters? How teachers learn, February 2009, 66 (5), 46-53

DuFour, R. & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement.Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and Curriculum Development

DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership 61(8) 6-11.

DuFour, R., DuFour, R, Eaker, R., & Many, T.(2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

DuFour, R., DuFour R., & Eaker, R. (2006). Professional learning communities at work plan book. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

Eaker, R., & Elementary, E. V. (2007). NAESP : The Elements of a Professional Learning Community The Elements of a Professional Learning Community NAESP : The Elements of a Professional Learning Community, 3–5.

Herawan, E. (2013). Kinerja Kepala Sekolah sebagai Instructional Leader..

Hord, S. (1997, 2003). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Retrieved from,

Kelly, J., & Cherkowski, S. (2015). Collaboration, Collegiality, and Collective Reflection: a Case Study of Professional Development for Teachers. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 169.

Lunenberg, F. C. 2010. Creating A Professional Learning Community. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 27, (4), hal. 1-8.

Martine Leclerc, Andre C Moreau, Catherine Dumouchel, and F. S. (2012). Factors Tha Promote Progession in Schools functioning as PLC. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 7(7), 1–14.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Tiddlie, C. 2003. A Framework for Analyzing Data in Mixed Methods Research dalam Tashakkori & Teddlie (Eds). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 351-384. London: Sage Publications, Inc. Psychology Press

Permana, J.Sudarsyah, A. (2016). Model Pengembangan Profesi guru melalui Professional Learning Community di Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, XXIII(1), 81–90.

Rahman, B. (2014). Refleksi diri dan upaya peningkatan profesionalisme guru seklah dasar , (1), 1–14.

Rijal, S. (2009). Leading the Learning Organization. Business Education & Accreditation, 1(1), 131–140. Retrieved from

Satori, D.Komariah, A. (2015). Model of Management Capacity Building for Improving the Quality of School, 9, 328–333.

Satori,D & Komariah,A. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta

Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Performance Instruction (Vol. Rev. and u).

Sobri, A. Y. (2013). Pembinaan Profesionalisme Guru dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran.

Stoll, Louise, Louis, S., & Karen. (2007). Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth And Dilemmas: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas, 207. Retrieved from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Educational Administration Research and Review

Educational Administration Research and Review is issued by Educational Administration Program,
School of Post Graduate, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.