The Effect of the Guided Discovery Learning Method on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Terms of Learning Motivation
Abstract
This research is aimed to know the effect of guided discovery learning method toward the level of critical thinking of students on economic subjects in SMA Negeri 6 Cimahi with moderator variable of learning motivation. This research was conducted on experimental class that carried out learning with guided discovery learning method and control class using conventional method. The research method used quasi experiment with factorial design model. The result of the analysis shows that (1) there is a difference of students' critical thinking level in the experimental class between before and after learning using guided discovery learning method where the students' critical thinking level after learning is higher than before implementing learning, (2) there is difference of students' between classes that learned to use guided discovery learning methods with classes using conventional methods in which the increase (n-gain) of the experimental class was higher when compared to the control class. (3) Highly motivated students have higher levels of critical thinking than low motivated students in both guided discovery learning and conventional classes, (4) there is an interaction between learning methods and learning motivation to the students' critical thinking level.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aba‐Oli, Z., Koyas, K., & Husen, A. (2025). Higher‐order thinking skills‐oriented problem‐based learning interventions in mathematics: A systematic literature review. School Science and Mathematics, 125(3), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12676
Aldalur, I., & Perez, A. (2023). Gamification and discovery learning: Motivating and involving students in the learning process. Heliyon, 9(1), e13135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13135
Bälter, O., Kann, V., Mutimukwe, C., & Malmström, H. (2024). English-medium instruction and impact on academic performance: a randomized control study. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(6), 2373–2396. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0093
Bamiro, A. O. (2015a). Effects of guided discovery and think-pair-share strategies on secondary school students’ achievement in chemistry. Sage Open, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014564754
Bamiro, A. O. (2015b). Effects of guided discovery and think-pair-share strategies on secondary school students’ achievement in chemistry. Sage Open, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014564754
Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2018). Student participation within teacher education: emphasising democratic values, engagement and learning for a future profession. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1352–1365. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1484708
Cabrera, L., Bae, C. L., & DeBusk-Lane, M. (2023). A mixed methods study of middle students’ science motivation and engagement profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102281
Cortázar, C., Nussbaum, M., Harcha, J., Alvares, D., López, F., Goñi, J., & Cabezas, V. (2021). Promoting critical thinking in an online, project-based course. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106705
Dong, J., Xu, S., Zhang, W., Yun, P., Jiang, W., & Yan, H. (2023a). Connectome-based predictive modeling: A new approach of predicting individual critical thinking ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101378
Dong, J., Xu, S., Zhang, W., Yun, P., Jiang, W., & Yan, H. (2023b). Connectome-based predictive modeling: A new approach of predicting individual critical thinking ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101378
Eun, B. (2019). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941
Goodyear, V., & Dudley, D. (2015a). “I’m a Facilitator of Lear‘I’m a facilitator of learning!’ Understanding what teachers and students do within student-centered physical education modelsning!” Understanding What Teachers and Students Do Within Student-Centered Physical Education Models. Quest, 67(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2015.1051236
Goodyear, V., & Dudley, D. (2015b). “I’m a facilitator of learning!” Understanding what teachers and students do within student-centered physical education models. Quest, 67(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2015.1051236
Huang, H.-W., Teng, D. C.-E., & Tiangco, J. A. N. Z. (2024). The impact of AI chatbot-supported guided discovery learning on pre-service teachers’ learning performance and motivation. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10179-9
Jiang, J.-P., Hu, J.-Y., Zhang, Y.-B., & Yin, X.-C. (2023). Fostering college students’ critical thinking skills through peer assessment in the knowledge building community. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6480–6496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2039949
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
Manganelli, S., Cavicchiolo, E., Mallia, L., Biasi, V., Lucidi, F., & Alivernini, F. (2019). The interplay between self-determined motivation, self-regulated cognitive strategies, and prior achievement in predicting academic performance. Educational Psychology, 39(4), 470–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1572104
Molina, J. A., Ferrer, A., Iñiguez, D., Rivero, A., Ruiz, G., & Tarancón, A. (2020). Network analysis to measure academic performance in economics. Empirical Economics, 58(3), 995–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1546-0
Samsudi, S., Supraptono, E., Utanto, Y., Rohman, S., & Djafar, T. (2024). Unraveling the merdeka curriculum: exploring differentiated instruction’s impact on student learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(2), 517. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i2.1131
Sharma, M., Doshi, B. M., Verma, M., & Verma, A. K. (2022). Strategies for developing critical-thinking capabilities. World Journal of English Language, 12(3), 117. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n3p117
Shukla, J., & Singh, R. M. (2024). Knowledge exploration among students: role of feedback, feeling of confidence, and academic motivation. Metacognition and Learning, 19(3), 1137–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09404-y
Talamás-Carvajal, J. A., Ceballos, H. G., & Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S. (2024). identification of complex thinking related competencies. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8079
Vieluf, S., Proske, M., & Naumann, A. (2025). What role does teaching play for learning? A critical discussion of the teaching effectiveness paradigm. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 36(2), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2025.2482581
Vu, T., Magis-Weinberg, L., Jansen, B. R. J., van Atteveldt, N., Janssen, T. W. P., Lee, N. C., van der Maas, H. L. J., Raijmakers, M. E. J., Sachisthal, M. S. M., & Meeter, M. (2022). Motivation-achievement cycles in learning: a literature review and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09616-7
Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2
Woods, P. J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2024). Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138, 104415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415
Xiaobing, L., & Yijun, F. (2025). Testing preschool children’s achievements: mobile seamless learning based on multicultural education in Hong Kong. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2462148
Xu, X., Shi, Z., Bos, N. A., & Wu, H. (2023). Student engagement and learning outcomes: an empirical study applying a four-dimensional framework. Medical Education Online, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2268347
Yao, Q., Zhu, P., Yu, X., Cheng, Y., Cui, W., & Liu, Q. (2025). The effectiveness of the student‐centered flipped classroom approach in medical anatomy teaching: a quasi‐experimental study. Clinical Anatomy, 38(4), 496–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24267
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijee.v2i1.10744
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indonesia Journal of Economics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.