MANAJEMEN UNIT PRODUKSI SEKOLAH Di SMK NEGERI 8 MAKASSAR

St. Fatimah Hadriah, Aris Munandar, Faridah Faridah

Abstract


This study aims to determine the production unit planning, organizing the production unit implementation production unit, production unit  supervision and supporting and  inhibiting factors for the management of school production  units. This research use descriptive qualitative approach. The results of the study showed that SMK Negeri 8 Makassar conducts production unit planning activities consisting of work program planning, planning personnel involved, budget planning and  sources of capital and planning of facilities  and infrastructure. Organizing the production unit is done by forming the organizational structure of the school production unit and issuance of decree, but there are several names listed in the organizational structure of the production unit no in accordance with the name stated in the decree made by the principal. Doing production units in accordance with the plans that have been made but marketing is done for the general public still limited. Supervision of production units is carried out on the assessment of student practice results   in the school  production unit and supervision of production units in accordance with the plans that have been made but marketing is done for the general public still limited. Supervision of production units is carried out on the assessment of student practice results in the school production unit and supervision carried out in the financial statement audit but not yet maximized. Supporting factors production unit, namely the willingness of executors in the production unit, professional educators, sufficient capital resources. Inhibiting factors is the limited time between teaching in class and as a tutor in the production unit, the quality of student work does not meet the standards

Keywords


management, production unit

References


Amador, J. (2016). Mathematics Pedagogical Design Capacity from Planning through Teaching. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 18(1), 70–86.

Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The Modeling and Assessment of Work Performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (Vol. 2). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427

Chou, Y., Yen, H.-Y., Yen, H.-W., Chao, Y.-L., & Huang, Y.-H. (2015). The Effectiveness of Teaching Aids for Elementary Students ’ Renewable Energy Learning and an Analysis of Their Energy Attitude Formation. International Journal of Environment & Science Education, 10(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.242a

Corcoran, R. P., & Flaherty, J. O. (2018). Factors that predict pre-service teachers ’ teaching performance. Journal of Education for Teaching, 7476, 0. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1433463

Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and Researching Motivation. PEARSON Education Inc (Second Edi). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833750

Elliott, K. (2015). Teacher Performance Appraisal: More about Performance or Development? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(40). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9.6

Fathurrohman, P., & Suryana, A. (2012). Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Freeman, J., Simonsen, B., Betsy, D., Sugai, G., Lombardi, A., & Horner, R. (2015). Relationship Between School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports and Academic , Attendance , and Behavior Outcomes in High Schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715580992

Ghavifekr, S., Athirah, W., Rosdy, W., & Teaching, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and Learning with Technology : Effectiveness of ICT Integration in Schools Teaching and Learning with Technology : Effectiveness of ICT Integration in Schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175–191.

Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation : Definition , research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2014). Administrasi Pendidikan: Teori, Riset, dan Praktik (terj.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Jex, S. M. (2002). Organizational Psychology : A Scientist-Practitioner Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Jones, J., Jenkin, M., & Lord, S. U. E. (2006). Developing effective teacher performance.

Keshwar Seebaluck, A., & Devi Seegum, T. (2013). Motivation among public primary school teachers in Mauritius. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541311316359

Kondalkar, V. G. (2007). Organizational Behaviour.

Latham, G. P. (2007). Work Motivation History, Theory, Research and Practice (Vol. 1).

Luthans, F. (2012). Organizational Behavior: an Evidence-Based Approach. Organizational behavior: an edivence-based approach. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Raob, I., Al-oshaibat, H., Lan, O. N. G. S., Raob, I., & Al-oshaibat, H. (2012). A Factor Analysis of Teacher Competency in Technology. New Horizons in Education, 60(1), 13–22.

Robbins, S. P. (2002). The Truth About Managing People-- And Nothing But The Truth. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Strong, L. E. G., & Yoshida, R. K. (2014). Teachers“ Autonomy in Today”s Educational Climate : Current Perceptions From an Acceptable Instrument. Educational Studies : A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 50, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.880922

Suharsaputra, U. (2013). Administrasi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Timperley, H. (2011). A background paper to inform the development of a national professional development framework for teachers and school leaders, (October).

Watkins, R., & Leigh, D. (2010). Handbook of Improving Performance in The Workplace (Volume Two). San Fransisco: Pfeiffer.

Wilkesmann, U., & Schmid, C. J. (2014). Intrinsic and internalized modes of teaching motivation. A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 2(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-07-2013-0022




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v26i1.19855

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan



ISSN: p.1412-8152 e.2580-1007
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan is issued by Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
free hit counter
View My Stats