MODEL PENGEMBANGAN KAPASITAS MANAJEMEN SEKOLAH (SCHOOL CAPACITYBUILDING) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN

Djam’an Satori, Danny Meirawan, Aan Komariah

Abstract


Rendahnya mutu pendidikan yang ditandai dengan rendahnya profesionalisme pendidik dan tenaga kependidikan; kurangnya ketersediaan dan pemanfaatan sarana-prasarana; lemahnya penggalian, manajemen dan akuntabilitas keuangan; dan kurangnya prakarsa/inisiatif berinovasi dalam pengembangan kurikulum merupakan akar masalah perlunya peningkatan kapasitas manajemen sekolah dalam merespons kebutuhan stakeholders dan kemajuan ilmu pengetahuan. Tiga segitiga sama sisi kapasitas yaitu kapasitas individu, kapasitas organisasi, kapasitas kepemimpinan menjadi fokus kajian pengembangan kapasitas manajemen sekolah. Penelitian yang melibatkan mahasiswa ini secara intensif menggunakan metode R&D dalam rekabangun model yang paling feasibel untuk membangun kapasitas manajemen sekolah yang efektif dan efisien pada SMA di Jawa Barat. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pengembangan kapasitas manajemen sekolah dimulai dari peningkatan kemampuan pendidik dan tenaga kependidikan profesional yang dilandasai pengembangan diri secara individual dan kelompok, dilakukan secara kontinu dan dengan penilaian kinerja yang valid. Alat untuk meningkatkan keberlanjutan bagi pengembangan kapasitas manajemen adalah kolegialitas dan prinsip pelaksanaannya adalah berkelanjutan melalui suatu action plan yang terukur. Model yang dikembangkan adalah 4CeeS untuk kepemimpinan bintang 5. 4CS (Casing, Communicating, Competencies, Contribution, Sample), Bintang lima 2 dimensi (Dimensi 1 : spirit-self dicipline, relationship-heart, purpose; Dimensi 2: Constructivistic Leadership-Valuebased leadership-servant leadership; transformational
leadership;visionary leadership)

The low quality of education in Indonesia has been indicated by several phenomena, such as the low quality of teachers’ and educational staffs professionalism; the lack of facility, deficiency of educational financing in terms of absorption, budgeting, and accountability; the lack of educational innovations in developing curriculum. Those fundamental problems indicate the need of improvement in terms of capacity development for school management that will be able to response to stakeholder’s needs and scientific development. Importantly, there are three important aspects that should be kept in mind to develop the capacity of school management. Those important aspects are individual, organizational, and leadership capacity. To construct a feasible model that will be able to build an efficient and effective senior high school management in West Java-Indonesia, this study employed a research and development (R&D) methodology. The findings revealed that the development of school management was started from the improvements done by teachers and administrators underlined. The improvements made were laid on the foundation of individual and organizational development through managerial tools. One of the tools that could be used was collegiality. It was recommended therefore that the collegiality should be based on measurable action plans that lead to a 4CS model — Casing, Communicating, Competencies, Contribution, and Sample. 4CS model is adopted from five-star leadership that has two dimensions. When the first dimension consists of self-discipline spirit, affective relationship, and purpose, the second dimension consists of constructive, value-based, servant, transformational, and visionary leadership.


Keywords


Kapasitas Manajemen Sekolah, Kepemimpinan Bintang Lima, 4CS. School management capacity, five star leadership, 4CS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Avolio, B., & Gardner, W. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338.

Bassey. (2011). Case Study Research in Educational Settings. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy. Volume 26, Issue 1, 2000

Creswell, JW. 2Q12.Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. New York: Sage

Gardner, W., Avolio, B., Luthans, F., Walumbwa, F., & May, D. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343-372.

George, Bill. (2003) .Authentic Leadership; Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value.San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass

Horton, et al. (2003). Evaluating Capacity Development; Experiences from Research and Development Organizations around the world. Netherlands-Canada: ISNAR, IDCR, ACP- EU, CTA.

Morrison, Terrence. (2000). Actionable Learning; A Handbook for Capacity BuildingThrough Case Base Learning. Asian Development Bank Institute

Sackney, Larry., Walker D. Keith. 2006. Leadership for Sustainable Learning Communities. New York: Sage

Yin, Robert K. (2011). Qualitative Research From Start to Finish. New York: Guilford

Publication Inc.

PGRI, 2009. Pengaruh Sertifikasi terhadap Peningkatan Kinerja Guru. Kompas. Tanggal 6 Oktober 2009

Permenegpan RB Nomor 16 Tahun 2009 tentang Jabatan Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kreditnya




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v17i1.6443

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan



ISSN: p.1412-8152 e.2580-1007
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan is issued by Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
free
hit counter
View My Stats