Types of Visual Impairment as Factors Shaping the Sense of Place of Visually Impaired Students in the School Environment

Devrian Syah Putra, Joni Hardi

Abstract


Spatial comfort in SLB learning environments is often understood as merely the physical quality of the space. However, visually impaired students experience space through their bodies, sounds, touch, and consistent non-visual environmental patterns. As a result, when spaces are difficult to recognize or have physical barriers, students not only hesitate to move, but also exhibit adaptive behaviors such as slowing down, avoiding certain areas, or even always seeking companions for a sense of security. Based on these conditions, this study aims to analyze the relationship between spatial comfort, behavior, and the formation of a sense of place among visually impaired students at SLB-A Pembina Tingkat Nasional Jakarta. This study uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. Data were collected through field observations and in-depth interviews with students at the SMALB level, then analyzed using content analysis. The findings were interpreted from a behavioral architecture perspective that emphasizes the reciprocal relationship between space and user behavior. The results show that consistent, accessible, and easily readable spaces through non visual cues not only encourage more independent, active, and confident behavior but also strengthen students' sense of place through repeated activity experiences. Meanwhile, changes in the spatial context, intensity of crowds, or inconsistencies in layout reduce comfort, weaken the sense of place, and increase behavior defensive. These findings confirm that the spatial environment acts as an active factor that shapes behavioral variations as well as the meaning of place for visually impaired students.


Keywords


Spatial comfort; Behavior of visually impaired student; Phenomenology; Spatial environment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior. Stanford University Press.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2012). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/preview/basics-of-qualitative-research.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2019). Pedoman layanan pendidikan bagi peserta didik tunanetra.

Kusuma, A. B. (2019). Analisis data kualitatif dengan pendekatan grounded theory dalam penelitian arsitektur. Universitas Indonesia.

Lang, J. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Laurens, J. M. (2004). Arsitektur dan Perilaku Manusia. In D. Novita (Ed.), Arsitektur dan Perilaku Manusia (Pertama, Vol. 42, Number 4). PT Grasindo. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Ltvj89G2AP4C&lpg=PP1&hl=id&pg=PP1&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/preview/phenomenological-research-methods.pdf

Pamungkas, A., & Ratri, N. (2019). Non-visual spatial comfort factors affecting mobility behavior of blind students. ATRIUM Journal of Architecture, 5(1), 33–41.

Pratiwi, R., & Puspitasari, D. (2017). Desain lingkungan sekolah ramah disabilitas. Jurnal Arsitektur MODUL, 17(2), 101–112.

Putri, R., Pramitasari, D., & Wijaya, K. (2020). Spatial accessibility evaluation for visually impaired students in special education schools. Journal of Disability Studies, 6(2), 101–115.

Ramli, M., Prasetyo, L. B., & Widyawati, L. (2018). Lingkungan belajar dan perilaku adaptif siswa berkebutuhan khusus. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 14(1), 23–35.

Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. Sage Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=bn_7_UFAbdUC&printsec=frontcover&hl=id&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion.

Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jare.v8i1.97197

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Architectural Research and Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.