THE KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES OF CLINICAL SUPERVISION AMONG COUNSELLORS IN BOTSWANA
Abstract
Background: There is dearth of literature on clinical supervision of counsellors in Botswana; the practice remains unexplored in a country where professional counselling is equally a new phenomenon. This mixed-methods study investigated knowledge, attitudes and practices of clinical supervision (CS) among counsellors. Methods: Study mixed quantitative and qualitative methods for data collection in explanatory sequential research design where 248 participants were drawn from varied environmental settings to provide information on clinical supervision practices of counsellors and clinical supervisors. Respondents were practising counsellors aged between 25 and 65 from 5 purposefully selected districts. 210 counsellors participated in quantitative study by responding to a questionnaire and 38 supervisors responded to semi-structured interviews. The study adopted theoretical triangulation underpinnings by social Constructivist theory; theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). Objective: purpose of the study was to determine knowledge, examine level of access, determine counsellors’ attitude and practices, examine guiding principles and possible strategies for improvement of the practice. Results: quantitative and qualitative findings revealed inadequate knowledge, limited competencies, poor access level, ineffective practices and a lack of ethical guiding principles, however, revealed positive attitudes towards CS. There was convergence in the findings and suggestions for improvement included; training, mandatory CS, developing national ethical guiding framework, review of counsellor education curricula and creating awareness. Majority of respondents reported lacking access, training and competencies, and being unaffiliated with any local regulatory body hence use ethical principles from foreign countries. Quantitative data was descriptively analysed using IBM SPSS and Qualitative data was thematically analysed and major themes were in unison with quantitative data findings. Conclusion: findings provide scientific and theoretical information for understanding CS; stimulating development, providing a baseline for future research and creating empirical knowledge resource.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The Influence of Attitudes on Behaviour. In
D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The Handbook of
Attitudes (pp. 173–221). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour.
In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to
behaviour (pp. 11-39). New York: Springer Verlag.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioural control, self‐efficacy, locus of control,
and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a theory of planned behaviour questionnaire:
Conceptual and methodological considerations. The University of
Massachusetts Amherst, Office of Information Technologies.
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/
Allan, R., McLuckie, A., & Hoffecker, L. (2017). Effects of clinical
supervision of mental health professionals on supervisee knowledge,
skills, attitudes and behaviour, and client outcomes: protocol for a
systematic review. The Campbell Collaboration, 1-44.
Australian Counselling Association (2019). Code of Ethics and Practice of the
Australian Counselling Association,15.www.theaca.net.au/documents/
Andrade, C., Menon, V., Ameen, S., & Kumar Praharaj, S. (2020). Designing
and Conducting Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Surveys in
Psychiatry: Practical Guidance. Indian journal of psychological
medicine, 42(5), 478–481.
Banaji, M. R., & Heiphetz, L. (2010). Attitudes. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert,
& G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 353–393. John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bashir, M., Afzal, M. T. & Azeem, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of
qualitative and operational research paradigm. Pakistan Journal of
statistics and operation research, 4(1), 35-45.
Bernard, J.M & Goodyear, R. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision
(6th ed.). Pearson. www.googlebooks.com
Bohner, G & Dickel, N. (2010). Attitudes and Attitude Change.
www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerd-
Bolisani, E & Bratianu, C. (2018). The Elusive Definition of Knowledge. In
the book: Emergent Knowledge Strategies.
www.researchgate.net/publication/318235014
Borders, L. D., Glosoff, H. L., Welfare, L. E., Hays, D. G., DeKruyf, L.,
Fernando, D. M., & Page, B. (2014). Best practices in clinical
supervision: Evolution of a counselling speciality. The Clinical
Supervisor, 33(1), 26–44.
Boswell, J., Stark, M. D., Wilson, A. D., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2017). The
impact of dual roles in mentoring relationships: A mixed research
study. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 9(2), 14.
Brady, B., & O'Regan, C. (2009). Meeting the challenge of doing an RCT
evaluation of youth mentoring in Ireland: A journey in mixed
methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3),265-280.
Collins, K. M., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2007). A mixed methods
investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health
science research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(3), 267-294.
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research.
Education Research and Perspectives,38(1),105.
Ellis, M. V., Berger, L., Hanus, A. E., Ayala, E. E., Swords, B. A., & Siembor,
M. (2014). Inadequate and harmful clinical supervision: Testing a
revised framework and assessing occurrence. The Counseling
Psychologist, 42(4), 434-472.
Ellis, M. V., Creaner, M., Hutman, H., & Timulak, L. (2015). A comparative
study of clinical supervision in the Republic of Ireland and the United
States. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(4), 621.
Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A
competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding
and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand
journal of psychiatry, 36(6), 717-732.
Goodyear, R. K., Falender, C. A., & Rousmaniere, T. (2017). Ethics issues
regarding supervision and consultation in private practice.
https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780190272166.003.0035
Goodyear R.K. (2014). Supervision as pedagogy: Attending to its essential
instructional and learning processes. The Clinical Supervisor,33
(1),82-99. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2014.918914
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative
Research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-606.
http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol8/iss4/6
Goodyear, R & Nicolas, H. (2020). Supervision of a Sample of Clinical and
Counselling Psychologists in the UK: A Descriptive Study of their
Practices, Processes and Perceived Benefits. The European Journal
of Counselling Psychology, 9(1), 41-50, 2020.
Grant, J., & Schofield, M. (2007). Career-long supervision: Patterns and
perspectives. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7(1), 3-11.
Johnson, R.B. (2014). Mixed Methods Research Design and Analysis with
Validity: A Primer. www.googlescholar.com
Lane, D., Watts, M., & Corrie, S. (2016). Supervision in the Psychological
Professions: Building Your Own Personalised Model.
McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
McMahon, A., & Errity, D. (2014). From new vistas to life lines:
Psychologists' satisfaction with supervision and confidence in
supervising. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 21(3), 264-275.
McMahon, A. (2014). Four guiding principles for the supervisory relationship.
Reflective Practice,15(3),333-346.
Msimanga, S. H. & Moeti, B. (2018). Challenges hindering the provision of
effective supervision for counselling students in Botswana (Doctoral
dissertation, University of Botswana). Mosenodi Journal 21
Muchado, J.A(2018). Counselling in Botswana: History, Current Status and
Future Trends. The Journal of Social Sciences Research. Special
Issue. 5, 743-748. www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi5.jssr5
Puzanova, Z. V., Larina, T. I., & Ignatova, T. A. (2023). Combination of
focus group and experiment methods: opportunities and limitations.
Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов.
Серия: Социология, 23(4), 866-874.
Taber, K. S. (2016). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and
reporting research instruments in science education. Research in
science education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https:// link.springer.com
Tromski‐Klingshirn, D. M., & Davis, T. E. (2007). Supervisees' perceptions of
their clinical supervision: A study of the dual role of clinical and
administrative supervisor. Counselor Education and Supervision, 46(4),
-304.
Vygotsky, L., & Cole, M. (2018). Lev Vygotsky: Learning and social
constructivism. Learning Theories for Early
Years Practice. UK: SAGE Publications Inc, 68-73.
Vygotsky, L. (2011). Interaction between learning and development, 79-91.
Linköpings universitet. https://ia.eferrit.com/ea/a6589cd86223
Watkins Jr, C. E. (2020). What do clinical supervision research reviews tell
us? Surveying the last 25 years.
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 20(2), 190-208.
Wyllie T.M & Muraina, K.O. (2024). Clinical Supervision of Counsellors in
Botswana: A Mixed Method Study of Perceptions, Knowledge,
Attitudes and Practice. Scope Journal 14(3),744-766.
Wyllie, T.M. (2024). The Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Clinical
Supervision Among Counsellors in Botswana. Unicaf University,
[Unpublished Thesis].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jomsign.v9i1.79619
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View My Stats