Apakah Kualitas Supreme Audit Institutions dan Tipe Hukum Negara Mempengaruhi Tingkat Korupsi?

Intan Siti Robiah, R. Nelly Nur Apandi

Abstract


Abstract

Eradicating corruption is important in sustainable development. This study aims to empirically examine the effect of SAI quality on the level of corruption, and to examine whether variable of state legal types can moderate the relationship between the two. Research using quantitative method with populations are all United Nations member countries in 2012, 2015, and 2017. The research sample was 55 countries. The level of corruption is proxied by Corruption Perception Index. SAI quality is measured using SAI index score, while the legal type variable is in the form of a dichotomy variable with two categories, civil law and common law. The results showed that the quality of SAI has a positive effect on the corruption perception indeks anf the state legal types strengthened the effect of SAI quality on the level of corruption. The implication of this study provide an empirical evidence to regulators that the role of SAI is very important in eradicating corruption.

Keywords: civil law; common law; coruption perception index; SAI.

 

Abstrak

Pemberantasan tindakan korupsi menjadi hal yang penting dalam pembangunan berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji secara empiris pengaruh kualitas SAI terhadap tingkat korupsi, dan menguji apakah variabel tipe hukum negara dapat memoderasi hubungan di antara keduanya. Penelitian menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan populasi penelitian adalah seluruh negara anggota PBB pada tahun pengamatan 2012, 2015 dan 2017. Jumlah negara yang menjadi sampel penelitian sebanyak 55 negara. Tingkat korupsi diproksikan dengan Indeks Persepsi Korupsi. Kualitas SAI diukur menggunakan skor indeks SAI, sedangkan variabel tipe hukum berbentuk dikotomi (dummy) dengan dua kategori, civil law dan common law. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kualitas SAI berpengaruh positif terhadap indeks persepsi korupsi dan tipe hukum negara memperkuat pengaruh kualitas SAI terhadap tingkat korupsi. Implikasi penelitian ini memberikan bukti empiris kepada regulator bahwa peran dari SAI sangat penting dalam mengurangi tindak korupsi.

Kata kunci: civil law, common law, indeks persepsi korupsi, SAI

 


Keywords


civil law; common law; Indeks Persepsi Korupsi; SAI

Full Text:

PDF

References


Assakaf, E. A., Samsudin, R. S., & Othman, Z. (2018). Public Sector Auditing and Corruption : A Literature Review, 10(1), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v10i1.13029

Broome, J. (2009). Intro to Civil Law Legal System - International Network to Promote the Rule of Law (INPROL) Consolidated Response.

Brusca, I., Rossi, F. M., & Aversano, N. (2017). Accountability and Transparency to Fight against Corruption : An International Comparative Analysis Accountability and Transparency to Fight against Corruption : An International Comparative Analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1393951

Colquhoun, P. (2013). Political and organizational legitimacy of public sector auditing in New Zealand local government. Accounting History, 18, 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373213505798

Germani, A. R. (2007). The Environmental Enforcement in the Civil and the Common Law System . A Case on the Economic Effects of Legal Institutions The Environmental Enforcement in the Civil and the Common Law Systems . A Case on the Economic Effects of Legal Institutions.

Ghaffoori, A. (2016). The Role of Accounting Reform in Deterring Corruption Practices in the Public Sector : A Case Study in Kurdistan Region Business & Financial Affairs. Journal of Business and Financial Affairs, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0234.1000229

Goodson, S. G., Mory, K. J., & Lapointe, J. R. (2012). Supplemental Guidance : The Role of Auditing in Public Sector Governance (2nd ed.). Altamonte Springs: The Institute of Internal Auditors. Retrieved from www.globaliia.org/standards-guidance

Gustavson, M., & Sundstorm, A. (2016). Organizing the Audit Society : Does Good Auditing Generate Less Public Sector Corruption ? Administration and Society, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716674306

Guterres, A. (2018). Corruption is Costing the Global Economy $3.6 Bilion Dollars Every Year. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/12/the-global-economy-loses-3-6-trillion-to-corruption-each-year-says-u-n

Hadi, S. (2016). Mengkaji Sistem Hukum Indonesia (Kajian Perbandingan dengan Sistem Hukum Lainnya). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 164–172.

Halim, A., & Abdullah, S. (2006). Hubungan Dan Masalah Keagenan Di Pemerintahan Daerah : Sebuah Peluang Penelitian Anggaran dan Akuntansi, (June).

IMF. (2018). Fiscal Transparency Handbook. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

INTOSAI. (2018). Performance and Accountability Report 2017—2018.

Johnson, J., Taxell, N., & Zaum, D. (2012). Assessing the State of the Operationally Relevant Evidence on Donors’ Actions and Approaches to Reducing Corruption.

Junaidi. (2018). Korupsi, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1), 71–79.

Kartiko, S. W. (2018). Measuring Accrual-Based IPSAS Implementation and Its Relationship to Central Government Fiscal Transparency, Brazilian Administration Review, 15(4), 1-28.

Kayrak, M. (2008). Evolving Challenges for Supreme Audit Institutions in Struggling with Corruption. Financial Crime, 15 no. 1, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/13590790810841707

Lidyah, R. (2016). Korupsi dan Akuntansi Forensik. Finance, 2(2), 72–91.

Liu, X. (2016). A Literature Review on the Definition of Corruption and Factors Affecting the Risk of Corruption, (June), 171–177.

Oliveira, C. B. De, & Filho, J. R. F. (2017). Agency problems in the public sector : the role of mediators between central administration of city hall and executive bodies. Public Administration, 51(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612171397

Otalor, J. I., & Eiya, O. (2015). Combating Corruption in Nigeria : The Role of the Public Sector Auditor. Finance and Accounting, 4(February 2013).

Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory : Review of Theory and Evidence on Problems and Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467

Persson, A., Rothstein, B. O., & Teorell, J. A. N. (2012). Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail — Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem. Policy, Administration and Institution, 2012, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x

Ramadhan, C. R. (2018). Konvergensi Civil Law dan Common Law di Indonesia dalam Penemuan dan Pembentukan Hukum. Mimbar Hukum, 30(2), 213–229.

Ramirez, J. A. O., & Perez, J. A. C. (2016). Impact of Supreme Audit on the phenomenon of corruption : an international empirical analysis. Public Governance of Policy, 1(June).

Sadaf, R., Olah, J., Popp, J., & Mate, D. (2018). An Investigation of the Influence of the Worldwide Governance and Competitiveness on Accounting Fraud Cases : A Cross-Country Perspective. Sustainability, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030588

Salih, W. K., & Hla, D. T. (2015). Audit Quality in Federal Board of Supreme Audit of Iraq. In International Conference on Contemporary Issues in Accounting and Finance. Samarahan: University Malaysia Sarawak. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309179457%0AAudit

Sawyer, L. B., Dittenhofer, M. A., & Scheiner, J. H. (2006). Sawyer’s Internal Auditing. Jakarta Selatan: Salemba Empat.

Seifert, J., Carlitz, R., & Mondo, E. (2013). The Open Budget Index (OBI) as a Comparative Statistical Tool. Comparative Policy Analysis : Research and Practice, 15(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2012.748586.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2017). Metode Penelitian Untuk Bisnis: Pendekatan Pengembangan Keahlian (6 (1)). Jakarta Selatan: Salemba Empat.

Simone, E. De, Gaeta, G. L., & Mourao, P. R. (2017). The Impact of Fiscal Transparency on Corruption : An Empirical Analysis Based on Longitudinal Data. The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2017-0021

Sugiono. (2004). Konsep, Identifikasi, Alat analisis dan Masalah Penggunaan Variabel Moderator. Jurnal Studi Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 1(2), 61–70. Retrieved from http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/smo%0AKONSEP.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tara, I., Simona, G. D., Droj, L., & Matica, D. (2016). The social role of the supreme audit institutions to reduce corruption in the European union - Empirical study, 52(February 2018), 217–240.

Transparency International. (2018). Corruption Perceptions Index 2018.

UNDP. (n.d.). Anti-Corruption and SDGs. Retrieved from http://www.anti-corruption.org/themes/anti-corruption-in-sdgs-2/

UNESCAP. (n.d.). What is Good Governance.

World Bank. (2001). Features and Functions of Supreme Audit Institutions. The Development Economics Vice Presidency and Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpak.v8i1.21444

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

JPAK : Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi dan Keuangan  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats