Application of AIR Learning Model to Improve Learning Outcomes of DPIB Students

Yohana Hutajulu

Abstract


Learning outcomes of basic techniques in the work of modeling design and building information of class X DPIB Vocational School 1 Lubuk Pakam are still relatively low. This is because the learning model used is centered on the teacher who is the only source of learning in the classroom so that students are not active in learning, and do not pay attention to the teacher when explaining the learning material. This study aims to apply the AIR learning model to improve student learning outcomes. This study is included in Classroom Action Research with two cycles. Each cycle consists of 4 stages, namely planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The data for this study were obtained from the learning outcomes test of 34 class X DPIB students. The test instrument tests carried out were test validity, test difficulty index, question discrimination and test reliability. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant increase in learning outcomes from cycle I to cycle II. In cycle I, the average score of students was 76.19 with a completion rate of 61.76%. While in cycle II, the average score of students increased to 82.11% with a completion rate reaching 88.24%, so the increase in learning outcomes was 7.77% and the classical completion of the class was 88.23%. This shows that the AIR learning model is successful in improving the learning outcomes of basic techniques in the work of modeling design and building information of class X Vocational School 1 Lubuk Pakam.

Keywords


AIR Learning Model; Classroom Action Research; Improving Learning Outcomes.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asim, H. M., Vaz, A., Ahmed, A., & Sadiq, S. (2021). A review on outcome based education and factors that impact student learning outcomes in tertiary education system. International Education Studies, 14(2), 1-11.

Khadriah, N. N., Azizah, N., Sa’idy, S. I., Istihana, I., & Baharudin, B. (2025). Learning outcomes: how is the experimentation of the air learning model?. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 271-279.

Gao, N., Rahaman, M. S., Shao, W., Ji, K., & Salim, F. D. (2022). Individual and group-wise classroom seating experience: Effects on student engagement in different courses. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(3), 1-23.

Hakim, F. R. (2021). Urgensi model pembelajaran interaktif dalam meningkatkan prestasi dan motivasi belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran pendidikan agama Islam. Tsamratul Fikri| Jurnal Studi Islam, 15(1), 1-18.

Harahap, S. M., & Wijaya, K (2024). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif index card match terhadap pencapaian belajar dalam pelajaran dasar-dasar dpib. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan, 4(2), 125-134.

Hellín, C. J., Calles-Esteban, F., Valledor, A., Gómez, J., Otón-Tortosa, S., & Tayebi, A. (2023). Enhancing student motivation and engagement through a gamified learning environment. Sustainability, 15(19), 14119.

Humeirah, M. S., Meirawan, D., & Purwanto, D. (2023). Analisis kesulitan pembelajaran pada mata pelajaran estimasi biaya konstruksi di smk kelas xii dpib. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan, 3(2), 89-100.

Kusumardi, A. (2023). Teknik coaching untuk memahami karakteristik siswa dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Sustainable, 6(1), 11-24.

Mason, L., & Otero, M. (2021). Just how effective is direct instruction?. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 44(2), 225-244.

Meng, S. (2023). Enhancing teaching and learning: aligning instructional practices with education quality standards. Research and Advances in Education, 2(7), 17-31.

Nuralam, N., & Maulidayani, M. (2020). Capaian kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dengan model air. Numeracy, 7(1), 35-48.

Nieminen, J. H., Chan, M. C. E., & Clarke, D. (2022). What affordances do open-ended real-life tasks offer for sharing student agency in collaborative problem-solving?. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(1), 115-136.

Palguna, I. M. A., Parwati, N. N., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran auditory, intellectually, repetition berbantuan media pembelajaran i-spring terhadap motivasi dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa sma. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Indonesia, 10(2), 56-75.

Suleman, M. A., & Idayanti, Z. (2024). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan proses pembelajaran di sd/mi. Mentari: Journal of Islamic Primary School, 2(3), 235-244.

Suyawati, D. P. (2022). Peningkatan keaktifan dan hasil belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran akidah akhlak dengan penerapan mastery learning. Indonesian Journal of Action Research, 1(2), 309-313.

Van den Berg, Y. H. M., & Stoltz, S. E. M. J. (2018). Enhancing social inclusion of children with externalizing problems through classroom seating arrangements: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26(1), 31-41.

Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107-138.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jptb.v5i2.88936

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan

 

 
slot online

POSTOTO787

Suge789
slot resmi
STM88
  • STM88 adalah Bandar Togel Resmi Terbesar se-Asia yang memberikan layanan profesional, sistem keamanan tinggi, serta peluang menang yang transparan, STM88 mampu meraih kepercayaan jutaan pemain.