Mechanical and Thermal Performance of Fly Ash–Clay Modular Walls in Micro House Net Zero Energy Implementation
Abstract
The construction sector faces increasing pressure to reduce energy consumption and embodied carbon, encouraging the development of sustainable building components based on industrial waste. This study evaluates the mechanical and thermal performance of modular wall systems developed from fly ash–clay composites as part of a 2025 research downstreaming program for Micro House Net Zero Energy (NZE) implementation. An applied experimental and descriptive–evaluative method was employed. Mechanical performance was assessed through compressive strength testing, showing values ranging from 7.8–9.5 MPa, which meet the requirements for low-rise residential buildings. Thermal performance evaluation indicates that the modular wall system achieves a thermal conductivity of approximately 0.45–0.52 W/mK, demonstrating improved heat resistance compared to conventional masonry walls. The modular configuration also reduced construction time by approximately 25–30% compared to conventional brickwork. These results confirm that fly ash–clay modular walls provide adequate structural capacity, enhanced thermal performance, and construction efficiency, supporting their application in Micro House NZE systems and strengthening the industrial readiness of waste-based construction materials
Keyword: Modular wall, fly ash–clay, mechanical performance, thermal performance, net zero energy housingy
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allwood, J. M., Ashby, M. F., Gutowski, T. G., & Worrell, E. (2019). Material efficiency: A white paper. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144, 1–15.
ASHRAE. (2017). Adaptive thermal comfort in residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 152, 667–675.
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2016). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.
Cabeza, L. F., Castell, A., Medrano, M., Leppers, R., & Zubillaga, O. (2010). Use of microencapsulated PCM in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 42(4), 534–540.
Chen, C., Habert, G., Bouzidi, Y., & Jullien, A. (2010). Environmental impact of cement production: Detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(5), 478–485.
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.
Geng, Y., Sarkis, J., & Ulgiati, S. (2019). Sustainability, wellbeing, and the circular economy in China and worldwide. Science, 364(6438), 73–76.
Gibb, A. G. F., & Pendlebury, M. (2006). Industrialized building systems and innovation. Building Research & Information, 34(3), 263–274.
Habert, G., Miller, S. A., John, V. M., Provis, J. L., Favier, A., Horvath, A., & Scrivener, K. L. (2020). Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(11), 559–573.
Hossain, M. U., Poon, C. S., Dong, Y. H., & Lo, I. M. C. (2020). Development of social life cycle assessment framework for building construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121292.
IEA. (2023). Building materials and the climate. International Energy Agency.
John, V. M., Cincotto, M. A., & Silva, M. G. (2018). Environmental performance of construction materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1199–1211.
Kylili, A., Fokaides, P. A., & Jimenez, P. A. L. (2014). Key performance indicators (KPIs) approach in buildings renovation for the sustainability of the built environment. Energy and Buildings, 86, 24–35.
Markham, S. K., Ward, S. J., Aiman-Smith, L., & Kingon, A. I. (2010). The valley of death as context for role theory in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 402–417.
Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803–815.
Meyer, C. (2009). The greening of the concrete industry. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(8), 601–605.
Miller, S. A., Horvath, A., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2018). Impacts of booming concrete production on water resources worldwide. Nature Sustainability, 1, 69–76.
Pacheco-Torgal, F., Labrincha, J. A., Leonelli, C., Palomo, A., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2013). Handbook of alkali-activated cements, mortars and concretes. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 1–14.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710–718.
Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2018). Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 2–26.
Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., Liu, P. H. Y., & Lin, L. C. (2017). A review of technology readiness assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 190–203.
Wang, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). Energy efficiency evaluation of building envelopes in hot climates. Energy and Buildings, 209, 109692.
Yang, L., Yan, H., & Lam, J. C. (2014). Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications. Energy and Buildings, 70, 61–70.
Zhang, L., Ahmad, I., Li, J., & Zhang, J. (2021). Sustainable building materials from industrial waste. Construction and Building Materials, 278, 122272.
Zuo, J., & Zhao, Z. Y. (2014). Green building research–current status and future agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271–281.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jodie.v5i2.95786
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Asep Yudi Permana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.