Peran Guru PAUD Membuat Lingkungan Belajar Multiliterasi yang Berorientasi Berpikir Desain Tata Ruang di RA Al-Nisa Labschool Prodi PIAUD Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Bone
Abstract
The discussion about multiliteracies showing in youth training has caught consideration for educators. Educators should reconsider multiliteracies instructional method and multiliteracies learning conditions to plan inventive and significant instructive spaces for small kids. By tending to the topic of the issue of how the conceptualizations of youth homerooms as a genuine transformation of reasoning on the one of a kind spatial preparation of RA Al-Nisa lab school PIAUD Study Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah IAIN Bone. The review means to propose to reconceptualize youth homerooms as a genuine site of an extraordinary spatial plan thought unrest In RA Al-Nisa lab school PIAUD Study Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah IAIN Bone. Research a remarkable space to speculate the new forms of education instructional method. This exploration investigates and draws out the reasoning of youth instructors and establishes a multiliteracies of learning conditions, a sort of subjective examination with an ethnographic methodology, this examination was set ra Al-Nisa lab school PIAUD Study Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah IAIN Bone. Information assortment through Observation, meetings and documentation the discoveries show that the course of educators planning thinking styles lies in culture and is driven by kids' inclinations permitting some youngster organizations in fake spatial importance as co-creators of the multiliteracies learning climate they possess. The plan thinking process unfurls through a ceaseless circle of rehashed and cooperative four-stage cycles. Instructors make thoughts and ponder multiliteracies and spot settling on choices that epitomized a learning climate in light of the universe of youngsters. At the point when the job of the educator establishes a multiliteracies climate through the plan manner of thinking the instructor will be engaged as a fashioner where variety of individuals, texts, practices, implications, and social settings meet to lay out correspondence
Pebincangan tentang pengajaran multiliterasi dalam pendidikan anak usia dini telah menyita perhatian bagi guru. Guru harus memikirkan kembali pedagogi multiliterasi dan lingkungan belajar multiliterasi untuk merancang ruang pendidikan yang inovatif dan bermakna untuk anak kecil. Dengan mengankat pokok permasalaha bagaiamana konsptualisasi ruang kelas anak usia dini sebagai nyata revolusi pemikiran desai tata ruang unik Di RA Al-Nisa labschool Prodi PIAUD Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Bone. Penelitian bertujuan menawarkan mengkonseptualisasikan kembali ruang kelas anak usia dini sebagai nyata situs revolusi pemikiran desai tata ruang yang unik Di RA Al-Nisa labschool Prodi PIAUD Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Bone. Penelitian ruang unik untuk berteori kontur baru pedagogi literasi. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi dan memunculkan pemikiran guru anak usia dini dan membuat multiliterasi lingkungan belajar, jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan etnografi, penelitian ini ditempatkan RA Al-Nisa labschool Prodi PIAUD Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Bone. Pengumupulan data melalui Observasi, wawancara dan dokukmentasi Hasil temuan menunjukkan bahwa proses guru mendesain gaya berpikir terletak pada budaya dan didorong oleh minat anak memungkinkan beberapa agensi anak di buatan bermakna spasial sebagai rekan penulis lingkungan belajar multiliterasi yang mereka tempati. Proses berpikir desain terungkap melalui siklus empat fase berulang dan kolaboratif yang berkelanjutan. Guru membuat ide dan merefleksikan multiliterasi dan keputusan pengambilan tempat yang terwujud lingkungan belajar berdasarkan dunia anak-anak. Saat peran guru membuat lingkungan multiliterasi melalui proses berpikir desain guru akan diberdayakan sebagai desainer di mana keragaman orang, teks, praktik, makna, dan konteks budaya bersinggungan untuk membangun komunikasi.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Butvilas, T., & Zygmantas, J. (2011). An etnographic case study in educational research. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 27, 33-42.
Cory Jobb. (2019). Power, Space, and Place in Early Childhood Education. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 44(3), 211–232.
Herawati, N., & Hidayat, A. (2020). Peranan guru dalam efektivitas kegiatan belajar mengajar pada paud Rose Jakarta. Akrab Juara: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, 5(4), 200-214.
Hermawati, N. S., & Sugito, S. (2021). Peran orang tua dalam menyediakan home literacy environment (HLE) pada anak usia dini. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(3), hlm. 1367–1381.
Hesterman, S. (2011). A contested space: the dialogic intersection of ict, multiliteracies, and early childhood. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(4), 349–361.
Hesterman, S. (2017). Time flies in California: Multiliteracies bridging local diversity and global connectedness through a reggio-inspired approach. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 25(3), 357–373.
Hidayat, H., & Amaliah, O. (2022). Estetika pojok baca ruang kelas anak usia dini. Journal Ashil: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 23-37.
Kuby, C. R., & Rowsell, J. (2017). Early literacy and the posthuman: Pedagogies and methodologies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 285–296.
Lella Gandini. (2011). Play and the hundred languages of children: An interview with lella gandini. Americal Journal of Play, 4(1), 1–18.
Mills, K. A. (2009). Multiliteracies: Interrogating competing discourses. Language and Education, 23(2), 103–116.
Moss, P. (2017). Power and resistance in early childhood education: From dominant discourse to democratic experimentalism. Journal of Pedagogy, 8(1), 11–32.
Puteh M., Che Ahmad C. N., Mohamed Noh N., Adnan M., and I. M. H. (2015). The classroom physical environment and its relation to teaching and learning comfort level. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(3), 237–140.
Putri, M. S. (2021). Transformasi lingkungan pembelajaran berbasis literasi digital pada anak usia dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 9(3), 408-415.
Robson, K., & Mastrangelo, S. (2018). Children’s views of the learning environment: a study exploring the reggio emilia principle of the environment as the third teacher. Journal of Childhood Studies, 42(4), 1–16.
Simon, R. (2011). On the human challenges of multiliteracies pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(4), 362–366.
Setiawan, D., Hartati, T., & Sopandi, W. (2020). Effectiveness of critical multiliteration model with radec model on the ability of writing explanatory text. EduHumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(1), 1-14.
Somerville, M., & Powell, S. J. (2019). Thinking posthuman with mud: and children of the anthropocene. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(8), 829–840.
Wisnu, I. K., & Wijaya, B. (2019). Eco family : Metode parenting anak usia dini untuk. Pratama Widya: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(1), 40–46.
Yayli, D. (2009). New roles for literacy teachers in the age of multiliteracies: A sociocultural perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 206-209.
Nurlela, M., & Amelia, P. (2021). Pengaruh kompetensi guru paud terhadap kemampuan manajerial kelas. Atthufulah: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 13-21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpa.v6i1.50424
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 JURNAL PAUD AGAPEDIA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
©Jurnal PAUD Agapedia. ISSN: 2580-9679 (Online) dan 2581-2823 (Print).
Jalan Dadaha Nomor 18 Kota Tasikmalaya
Telepon (0265) 331860
Homepage: http://pgpaud-tasikmalaya.upi.edu/
Email: pgpaud_tasik@upi.edu