Mengukur Kerentanan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Melakukan Fraud : Survei di Kota Bandung
Abstract
Praktik korupsi yang banyak terungkap di Indonesia membutuhkan penanganan khusus di segi pencegahan sejak dini pada pendidikan sekolah menengah. Penelitian ini bermaksud untuk mengukur kerentanan siswa sekolah menengah melakukan fraud dalam rangka mengidentifikasi faktor pemicu fraud pada siswa sekolah menengah. Hal ini sangat penting agar setiap pemicu fraud dapat diberantas sejak usia dini. Penelitian ini merupakan studi deskriptif yang bersifat cross sectional dengan unit analisis siswa sekolah menengah di Kota Bandung. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui survei on-line dengan teknik snowball sampling. Di samping itu juga dilakukan wawancara kepada para guru pada beberapa sekolah menengah di Kota Bandung untuk mengkonfirmasi hasil survei. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa kerentanan siswa sekolah menengah melakukan fraud cenderung rendah. Hal ini mengindikasikan pendidikan yang telah berjalan di sekolah menengah telah berhasil menanamkan karakter unggul sehingga kecenderungan siswa melakukan fraud ada pada kategori rendah. Sedangkan dilihat dari ranking kerentanan melakukan fraud, pressure menjadi faktor pemicu tertinggi.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, G.W., Campbell, D.R., Campbell, M., Rose, M.P. 2006. Fraud Prevention. The CPA Journal. 76(1): 56-59. Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/212230465/fulltextPDF/D2F838DFDDE54685PQ/209?accountid=31495
Akkeren, J.V. & Buckby, S. 2017. Perceptions on the Causes of Individual and Fraudulent Co-offending: Views of Forensic Accountants. Journal of Business Ethics. 146(2): 383-404. DOI:10.1007/s10551-015-2881-0
Albrech, W.S., Albrecht, C.C., Albrech, C.O., & Zimbelman, M.F. 2009. Fraud Examination. Third Edition. USA: South Western Cengage Learning.
Andon, P., Free, C., & Scard, B. 2015. Pathway to Accountant Fraud: Australian Evidence and Analysis. Accounting Research Journal. 28(1): 10-44. Retrieved from: https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/ARJ-06-2014-0058?fullSc=1&journalCode=arj
Association of Certified Fraud Examiner. 2016. Fraud Examiners Manual. USA: ACFE.
Button, M., & Brooks, G. 2009. "Mind the gap", progress towards developing anti-fraud culture strategies in UK central government bodies. Journal of Financial Crime. 16(3): 229-244. DOI:10.1108/13590790910971784
Button, M., Gee, J., & Brooks, G. 2012. Measuring the cost of fraud: an opportunity for the new competitive advantage. Journal of Financial Crime. 19(1): 65-75. DOI:10.1108/13590791211190731
Cieslewicz, J. 2010. The fraud square: societal influences on the risk of fraud. American Accounting Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 31 July-4 August 2010.
Doost, R. 1990. Accounting irregularities and computer fraud. National Public Accountant. 35(5): 36-39.
Dorminey, J., Fleming, A.S., Kranacher, M., & Riley, R.A. 2012. The Evolution of Fraud Theory. Issues in Accounting Education. 27(2): 555-579. Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1022625944/D2F838DFDDE54685PQ/130?accountid=31495
Free, C. 2015. Looking through the fraud triangle: a review and call for new directions. Meditari Accountancy Research. 23(2): 175-196. Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1692035019/fulltextPDF/D2F838DFDDE54685PQ/244?accountid=31495
Frimpong, K. 2015. Back to basics: fighting fraud and austerity. Journal of Financial Crime. 22(2): 219-227. DOI:10.1108/JFC-11-2013-0065
Goldman, P. 2010. Fraud in the Markets. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Hartiningsih, M. 2011. Korupsi yang Memiskinkan. Jakarta: PT Kompas Media Nusantara.
Hibino, M. & Sharifi, M. 2013. Fraud Prevention Methodology: The Ishikawa Diagram. Internal Auditing. 28(5): 27-36. Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1461990905/fulltextPDF/D2F838DFDDE54685PQ/300?accountid=31495
Hollow, M. Money, morals and motives. Journal of Financial Crime. 21(2): 174-190. DOI:10.1108/JFC-02-2013-0010
Kapardis, M.K., & Papastergiou, K. 2016. Fraud victimization in Greece: room for improvement in prevention and detection. Journal of Financial Crime. 23(2): 481-500. DOI:10.1108/JFC-02-2015-0010
Kranacher, M. J., R. A. Riley Jr., & J. T. Wells. 2011. Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Lister, L.M. 2007. A practical approach to Fraud Risk. The Internal Auditor. 64(6): 61-65,8. Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/202735734/fulltext/D2F838DFDDE54685PQ/154?accountid=31495
Lord, A.T. 2010. The Prevalence of Fraud: What Should We, as Academics, be Doing to Address the Problem? Accounting and Management Information Systems. 9(1): 4-21. Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/853704540/fulltextPDF/D2F838DFDDE54685PQ/224?accountid=31495
Marks, J. 2009. Playing Offense in a High-Risk Environment. NewYork: Crowe Horwath. Retrieved from: http://internalaudits.duke.edu/documents/articles_archive/PlayingOffenseWhitePaper4_09.pdf
Marks, J.T. 2009. Uncovering Hidden Risks. Financial Executive. 25(5): 44-47. Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/208883307/fulltextPDF/D2F838DFDDE54685PQ/155?accountid=31495
Morales, J., Gendron, Y., & Guenin-Paracni, H. 2014. The Construction of the Risky Individual and Vigilant Organization: A Genealogy of the Fraud Triangle. Accounting, Organizations, and Society. 39(3): 170-194. Retrived from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3e20/856821b283669a826871e854aedcde8b4053.pdf
Pradiptyo, R., Partohap, T.H., & Pramashavira. 5 April 2016. Korupsi Struktural: Analisis Database Korupsi Versi 4 (2001-2015). Yogyakarta: Laboratorium Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Rezaee, Z. 2004. Restoring public trust in the accounting profession by developing anti-fraud education, programs, and auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal. 19(1): 134-148. Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/274525541/fulltextPDF/D2F838DFDDE54685PQ/25?accountid=31495
Singleton, T., Bologna, J., Singleton, A., & Lindquist, R. 2006. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Siregar, S.V., & Tenoyo, B. 2015. Fraud awareness survey of private sector in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime. 22 (3): 329-346. DOI:10.1108/JFC-03-2014-0016
Transparency International Indonesia. 2016. Survei Persepsi Korupsi 2015. Retrieved from: http://www.ti.or.id/index.php/publication/2015/09/15/survei-persepsi-korupsi-2015.
Transparency International. 2013. Global Report: Education. NY: Routledge.
Transparency International. 2015. Table of Results: Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. Retrieved from: https://www.transparency.org/cpi2015/.
Transparency International. 2016. Table of Results: Corruption Perceptions Index 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.transparency.org/cpi2016/.
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Verick, P. 2013. Addressing Dynamic Threats of Fraud. Financial Executive. 29(5): 46-49. Retrieved from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1429244087/fulltextPDF/D2F838DFDDE54685PQ/294?accountid=31495
Wijayanto & Zachrie, R. 2009. Korupsi Mengkorupsi Indonesia: Sebab, Akibat dan Prospek Pemberantasan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wolfe, D. T., & D. Hermanson. 2004. The Fraud Diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal (December). Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2546&context=facpubs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v10i2.13904
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats Visitor