COSO ERM AND THE ROLE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS IN FRAUD PREVENTION (Survey on Internal Auditors in Indonesia)
Abstract
Main Purpose - This study aims to determine and analyze how much the role of internal audit and internal control with the COSO ERM 2017 approach has an effect on preventing fraud (corruption).
Method - The data was obtained through the distribution of questionnaires to the internal auditors at the Indonesian Institute of Internal Auditors. Determination of the sample using random sampling method, for data analysis used the SEM-PLS analysis method, with the number of samples obtained as many as 133 respondents.
Main Findings - The fact that happened in Indonesia, there are several cases of corruption have occurred as an example of the corruption case of PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (ASABRI), the corruption case of PT. Garuda Indonesia (Persero), Tbk. Corruption case of Lobster Seed permit, case of social assistance covid-19, LPEI corruption allegation. This phenomenon proves that there are still various corruption problems that occur in Indonesia, the 2019 ACFE survey shows that fraud is dominated by acts of corruption with a percentage of 64.4%. This attracts researchers to conduct further research on the role of internal audit and internal control in the COSO ERM 2017 framework which was not found in previous research, and focuses more on preventing fraud, the type of corruption in which more and more cases of corruption appear as stated by ACFE (2019).
Theory and Practical Implications - The role of Internal Audit has a positive effect on Fraud Prevention. Internal Control with the COSO ERM 2017 framework has a positive effect on Fraud Prevention.
Novelty - Research on the role of internal audit related to internal control COSO ERM 2017, is still rarely done. In addition, this research also focuses more on preventing fraud in the form of corruption. According to ACFE, currently corruption is the most common fraud case.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Arens, Randal, E., & Beasley, M. S. (2012). Auditing and Assurance Services : An integrated Approach. In Fourteenth Edition. Pearson.
Commission, C. of S. O. of the T. (2004). Enterprise Risk Management — Integrated Framework Executive Summary. In New York (Vol. 3, Issue September, pp. 1–16). http://www.coso.org/documents/COSO_ERM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf
Dewi, N. K. A. A., & Wirakusuma, M. G. (2019). Pengaruh Moralitas Individu, Pengendalian Intern Dan Budaya Etis Organisasi Terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 29(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v29.i01.p05
Effendi, A., & Paramarta, V. (2020). The Role of Internal Auditors and the Implementation of Good Corporate Governance in Fraud Prevention at PT. Pos Indonesia (Persero) Bandung. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(1), 3744–3761. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=s3h&AN=144307415〈=ja&site=ehost-live
Fahmi, M., & Syahputra, M. R. (2019). Peranan Audit Internal Dalam Pencegahan (Fraud). Liabilities (Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi), 2(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.30596/liabilities.v2i1.3327
Hair, J., William, C., Black, B., & Babin, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Editio). Pearson.
Marsandy, E. D., & Rahmaita. (2018). Pengaruh Peran Audit Internal Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud (Studi Kasus Pada PT Semen Padang). Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis Dharma Andalas, 20(2), 238–246.
Nitsae, O. G., Nurkholis, N., & Purwanti, L. (2020). Upaya Minimalisasi Kecurangan Yang Terjadi Pada Kabupaten Timor Tengah Selatan. JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations), 4(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v4n2.p75-83
Novita Lorensa, C., Fallah, S., Si, M., & Sanggenafa, M. A. (2018). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Peran Auditor Internal terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan dengan Komponen Struktur Pengendalian Internal Variabel Intervening (Studi Empiris Pada Inspektorat Provinsi, Kabupaten dan Kota Jayapura). Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah, 13(2), 13–25.
Nusantara, A. F. P., Irianto, G., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2020). Fraud prevention and detection practices in the perspective of Jember Regency internal auditor. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 9(4), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.775
Peltier-Rivest, D. (2018). A model for preventing corruption. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2014-0048
Pratiwi, K. I., Rosdini, D., & Fitriyah, F. K. (2020). Influence of transformational leadership style, internal control system, and government internal auditor (APIP) capability level on fraud prevention. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(11), 705–726.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suroso. (2011). Pencegahan dan Pendeteksian Kecurangan Dalam Perusahaan Oleh Internal Auditor. Akuntansi Bisnis Dan Publik Program Studi Akuntansi, 2(1), 1–5.
Syahputra, M. (2019). Peranan Audit Internal Dalam Pencegahan Fraud (Studi Kasus Pada PT. Pos Indonesia Regional I Sumut-Aceh). Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Week, C. G. (2009). INTERNAL AUDITING : Assurance and. In Corporate Governance (Issue June). Lake Mary, Internal Audit Foundation.
Wells, J. T. (2018). Internasional Fraud Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Wulandari, D. N., & Nuryanto, M. (2018). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Kesadaran Anti-Fraud, Integritas, Independensi, dan Profesionalisme Terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana, 4(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.26486/jramb.v4i2.557
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v14i2.48834
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats Visitor