Corporate Social Responsibility, Company Value, and Company Size in Southeast Asia
Abstract
This study aims to determine the relationship between company value and corporate social responsibility and company size. Method This research uses a quantitative methodology. Multiple regression analysis was used in the descriptive-verificative approach of the investigation. The research method used in this research is a quantitative approach companies served as the study's units of analysis. The research used a cross-sectional in Southeast Asia in 2022 which data is available at Thomson Reuters on the website https://www.refinitiv.com. The findings of this study showed that company value is positively impacted by corporate social responsibility while negatively impacted by company size. The findings of that study need for consideration by companies to implement policies related to corporate social responsibility and since it is a company size able to change investors’ views, therefore company goals are expected to include economic, environmental and social where the company is established. However, the companies also have to pay attention to the number and increase in total assets because high total assets a significant effect on high risk and competition. This study provides novel insights into the relationship between between corporate social responsibility and business value in the Southeast Asian region.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-slehat, z. A. F. (2019). Impact of financial leverage, size and assets structure on firm value: evidence from industrial sector, jordan. International Business Research, 13(1), 109.
Bouslah, k., Hmaittane, a., Kryzanowski, l., and m’zali, b. (2023). Csr structures: evidence, drivers, and firm value implications. Journal Of Business Ethics, 185(1), 115–145.
Brigham, e. F., and Daves, p. R. (2019). Intermediate financial management. In Cengage (Vol. 13).
Brigham, e. F., and Houston, j. F. (2018). Fundamentals of financial management cegage learning. In The Journal Of Finance (Vol. 34, Issue 5). Cengage learning.
Buchanan, b., Cao, c. X., and Chen, c. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership. Journal Of Corporate Finance, 52, 73–95.
Cheng, y., Liu, y., and Chien, c. (2010). Capital structure and firm value in china: a panel threshold regression analysiss. African Journal Of Business Management, 4(12), 2500–2507.
Cherian, j., Umar, m., thu, p. A., Nguyen-trang, t., Sial, m. S., and Khuong, n. V. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility affect the financial performance of the manufacturing sector? Evidence from an emerging economy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4), 1–14.
Hirdinis, m. (2019). Capital structure and firm size on firm value moderated by profitability. International Journal Of Economics And Business Administration, 7(1), 174–191.
Ibrahim, m. (2017). Capital structure and firm value in nigerian listed manufacturing companies: an empirical investigation using tobin’s q model. International Journal Of Innovative Research In Social Sciences And Strategic Management Techniques | Ijirsssmt, 4(2), 112–125.
Immanuel, a. M. (2021). Effect of csr, financial distress, and corporate’s growth on earning response coefficient. Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 13(2), 362–374.
Jallo, a., and Mus, a. R. (2017). Effect of corporate social responsibility , good corporate governance and ownership structure on financial performance and firm value : A Study In Jakarta Islamic Index. 19(11), 64–75.
Jo, h., and Harjoto, m. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: the impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal Of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.
Khan, a. G. (2012). The relationship of capital structure decisions with firm performance: a study of the engineering sector of pakistan. International Journal Of Accounting And Financial Reporting, 2(1), 245.
Khuong, n. V., and Anh, l. H. T. (2023). The nexus between corporate social responsibility and firm value: the moderating role of life-cycle stages. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(5), 949–969.
Kim, w. S., Park, k., and Lee, s. H. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure,
and firm value: evidence from korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7).
Lischewski, j., and Voronkova, s. (2012). Size, value and liquidity. Do they really matter on an emerging stock market? Emerging Markets Review, 13(1), 8–25.
Liu, x., and Zhang, c. (2017). Corporate governance, social responsibility information disclosure, and enterprise value in china. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 142, 1075–1084.
Manchiraju, h. (2017). Does corporate social responsibility ( csr ) create shareholder value ? Evidence from the indian companies act 2013.
Marcelia, e., and Purnomo, b. S. (2016). Pengaruh nilai tambah modal intelektual dan pengungkapan modal intelektual terhadap nilai perusahaan (studi pada perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia). Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 8(1), 29.
Mcwilliams, a., and Siegel, d. (2001). Research notes and communications corporate social responsibility and financial performance : correlation or misspecification ? 609(January 1999), 603–609.
Nuswandari, c., Sunarto, s., and Jannah, a. (2019). Corporate social responsibility moderated the effect of liquidity and profitability on the firm value. 86(Icobame 2018), 87–90.
Okafor, a., Adusei, m., and Adeleye, b. N. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: evidence from u.s tech firms. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 292.
Padfield, s. J. (2015). William and mary business law review corporate social responsibility and concession theory. 6(1).
Reverte, c. (2012). The impact of better corporate social responsibility disclosure on the cost of equity capital. Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 19(5), 253–272.
Sampong, f., Song, n., Boahene, k. O., and Wadie, k. A. (2018). Disclosure of csr performance and firm value: new evidence from south africa on the basis of the gri guidelines for sustainability disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12).
Sudiyatno, b., Puspitasari, e., Suwarti, t., and Asyif, m. M. (2020). Determinants of firm value and profitability: evidence from indonesia. Journal Of Asian Finance, Economics And Business, 7(11), 769–778.
Suhendi, c.,Ifada, l. M., and Kiryanto, k. (2022). Reinforce corporate social responsibility through earnings management. Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 14(1), 073–084.
Wang, q., Dou, j., and Jia, s. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: the moderating effect of contextual factors. In Business And Society (Vol. 55, Issue 8).
Wang, y. (2016). Borsa _ istanbul review what are the biggest obstacles to growth of smes in developing countries ? E an empirical evidence from an enterprise survey. Borsa Istanbul Review.
Wirawan, a. W., falah, l. J., kusumadewi, l., Adhariani, d., and Djakman, c. D. (2020). The effect of corporate social responsibility on the firm value with risk management as a moderating variable. Journal Of Asia-Pacific Business, 21(2), 143–160.
Yang, m., Bento, p., and Akbar, a. (2019). Does csr influence firm performance indicators? Evidence from chinese pharmaceutical enterprises. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(20).
Zhang, d., Wang, c., and Dong, y. (2023). How does firm esg performance impact financial constraints? An experimental exploration of the covid-19 pandemic. European Journal Of Development Research, 35(1), 219–239.
Zhang, f., and Jung, j. Y. (2020). Changes in the influence of social responsibility activities on corporate value over 10 years in china. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22), 1–17.
Zhang, f., Qin, x., and Liu, l. (2020). The interaction effect between esg and green innovation and its impact on firm value from the perspective of information disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(6).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v15i2.61653
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats Visitor