ESG Reputation Risk, Corporate Risk-Taking, and Climate Impact in Southeast Asia

Fajar Meiyanti, Desi Adhariani

Abstract


The primary objective of this study is to examine the influence of corporate risk-taking (CRT) and the climate risk index (CRI) on the Reputation Risk Index (RRI). The analysis employs panel data regression using 597 firmyear observations of non-financial firms across five Southeast Asian countries from 2021 to 2023. Additional robust tests and alternative measurements are used to ensure the consistency and reliability of the findings. The results reveal that CRT has a significant positive effect on RRI, indicating that higher levels of corporate risk-taking are associated with increased ESG-related reputation risks driven by heightened stakeholder scrutiny. Furthermore, the findings show that CRI does not exert a significant influence on RRI, suggesting that climate-related vulnerabilities may affect reputation only through indirect channels. These results reflect broader phenomena wherein firms engaging in aggressive financial or strategic risk behaviors face greater reputational exposure than those primarily confronted with environmental risks. The evidence highlights the distinct pathways through which financial and environmental dimensions translate into corporate reputation outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications encourage firms to strengthen governance mechanisms that balance risk-taking with stakeholder expectations to reduce ESG reputation risks. Policymakers are advised to integrate ESG-aligned risk management standards to enhance corporate accountability across emerging markets. The novelty of this research lies in the introduction of the ESG Reputation Risk Index as a new metric and its application within the Southeast Asian context, which remains underexplored in prior studies.


Keywords


ESG Reputation Risk; Corporate Risk Taking; Climate Risk

Full Text:

Pdf

References


Allianz. (2023). Allianz Risk Barometer: Identifying the major business risks for 2023. Retrieved from https://commercial.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/commercial/commercial/reports/Allianz-Risk-Barometer-2023.pdf

Allianz. (2024). Allianz Risk Barometer: Identifying the major business risks for 2024. Retrieved from https://commercial.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/commercial/commercial/reports/Allianz-Risk-Barometer-2024.pdf

Asante-Appiah, B., & Lambert, T. A. (2023). The role of the external auditor in managing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reputation risk. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(4), 2589–2641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09706-z

Aydogmus¸, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(suppl 2), S119–S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006

Chen, Y., Ren, Y. S., Narayan, S., & Huynh, N. Q. A. (2024). Does climate risk impact firms’ ESG performance? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.028

Deloitte. (2014). Global survey on reputation risk. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Governance-Risk-Compliance/gx_grc_Reputation@Risk%20survey%20report_FINAL.pdf

Du, L., & Nik Azman, N. H. (2024). The impact of ESG performance on corporate risk-taking: empirical evidence from China. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2024.2366179

Feng, X., & Yu, R. (2024). How does digital transformation affect corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 103614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103614

Hales, J. 2018. The Future of Accounting is Now. The CPA Journal, (July 2018). https://www.cpajournal. com/2018/07/16/the-future-of-accounting-isnow/. Accessed 19 July 2022.

He Huang, H., Kerstein, J., & Wang, C. (n.d.). The impact of climate risk on firm performance and financing choices: An international comparison.

He, F., Ding, C., Yue, W., & Liu, G. (2023). ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102550

Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H., Benston, G., Canes, M., Henderson, D., Leffler, K., Long, J., Smith, C., Thompson, R., Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. In Journal of Financial Economics (Issue 4). Harvard University Press. http://hupress.harvard.edu/catalog/JENTHF.html

Naseer, M. M., Guo, Y., Bagh, T., & Zhu, X. (2024). Sustainable investments in volatile times: Nexus of climate change risk, ESG practices, and market volatility. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103492

Nguyen, Q. K. (2021). Oversight of bank risk-taking by audit committees and Sharia committees: conventional vs Islamic banks. Heliyon, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07798

Nguyen, Q. K. (2022). Audit committee effectiveness, bank efficiency and risk-taking: Evidence in ASEAN countries. In Cogent Business and Management (Vol. 9, Issue 1). Cogent OA. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2080622

Ooi, C. A., Lu, M. P., & Zulkafli, A. H. (2024). Corporate risk-taking, economic policy uncertainty and ESG performance: International evidence. Business Strategy and Development, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70028

Refinitiv Eikon. (2025). Refinitiv Eikon. https://eikon.refinitiv.com/

RepRisk. (2025). RepRisk. https://www.reprisk.com/

S&P Global. (2025). Capital IQ. https://www.capitaliq.spglobal.com/

Tang, M., Hou, Y. (Greg), Goodell, J. W., & Hu, Y. (2024). Fintech and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105411

World Economic Forum. (2012). Global risks 2012: Seventh edition. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-2012-seventh-edition/

Allianz. (2019). Top business risks for 2019: About Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty. Retrieved from https://commercial.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/commercial/commercial/reports/Allianz-Risk-Barometer-2019.pdf

Yébenes, M.O. (2024). Climate change, ESG criteria and recent regulation: challenges and opportunities. Eurasian Economic Review, 14(1), 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00251-x

Yin, Z., Deng, R., Xia, J., & Zhao, L. (2024). Climate risk and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102245

Zhu, N., Yang, J., & Rahman, A. (2024). The impact of managerial myopia on corporate ESG reputation risk: moderating role of digitization. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05607-0




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v17i2.83255

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

View My Stats Visitor