Pengembangan kegiatan praktikum pemodelan efek rumah kaca untuk siswa SMA pada materi perubahan lingkungan
Abstract
The lack of laboratory equipment and malfunctioning laboratories in schools makes teachers reluctant to carry out practical activities, especially on the topic of environmental change. This study aims to produce an effective practicum activities in accordance with the demands of the curriculum in the elementary school of high school students on the material of global warming. The method if used in this research is descriptive research method. To test the effectiveness of practicum activities developed used a class experiment in class X in a high school by using pretest and posttest. This research uses Thiagarajan et al. (1974) development model that is development model (4-D) (Four-D models). This development model consists of four stages, namely definie, design, develop, without disseminate. The test instrument is a matter of multiple choice with 15 items that have been validated by the expert. The results of the validation show that the greenhouse effect modeling activity, developed in this research is feasible and effective. The effectiveness criteria of the practicum activity refers to the achievement of the average value of the students that exceeds the minimum score (75).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abraham, I. & Millar. R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1-25.
Codur, A-M., Itzkan, S., Moomaw, W. Thidemann, K. & Harris, J. (2017). Hope below our feet: Soil as a climate solution. GDAE Climate Policy Brief. [Online] Retrieved from http://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/climate/ClimatePolicyBrief4.pdf
Depdiknas. (2008). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas Direktorat Jendral Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Gray, R. (2014). The distinction between experimental and historical sciences as a framework for improving classroom inquiry. Science Education, 98(2), 327-341.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Dept. of Physics Indiana University. [Online] Retrieved from dari http://www.physics.indiana.edu
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2002). Third report. Science education from 14 to 19. London: HMSO. [Online] Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmsctech/508/50802.htm
Janah, I. (2013). Pengembangan LKS berbasis POE pada materi pengelolaan lingkungan di SMP Negeri 3 Welahan. (Disertasi). Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in teaching and learning of science. Washington: University of York.
Rini, S. A, Bambang, S, & Tina, S. N., (2014). Analisis relevansi lembar kerja siswa terhadap kompetensi dasar pada konsep protista. Formica Education Online, 1(1). [Online] Retrieved from http://journal.fpmipa.upi.edu/index.php/feo/article/view/106
Rustaman, N. Y. (2009). Peranan praktikum dalam pembelajaran biologi. [Online] Retrieved from http://file.upi.edu/direktori/sps/prodi.pendidikan_ipa/195012311979032nuryani_rustaman peranan_praktikum_dalam_pembelajaran_biologi.pdf
Supriatno, B. (2009). Uji langkah kerja laboratorium sekolah. In Proseding Seminar Nasional Biologi: Inovasi dan Pendidikan Biologi dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia, 255-261.
Supriatno, B. (2013). Pengembangan program perkuliahan pengembangan kegiatan praktikum biologi sekolah berbasis ANCORB untuk mengembangkan kemampuan merancang dan mengembangkan desain kegiatan laboratorium. (Disertasi). Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Supriyatna, Y. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat praktikum IPA SMP bermuatan literasi lingkungan pada tema pemanasan global. (Tesis). Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. Bloomington, Indiana: Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicappet. [Online] Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090725.pdf
Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418.
Thair, M. & Treagust, D. F. (1997). A review of teacher development reforms in Indonesian secondary science: The effectiveness of practical work in biology. Research in Science Education, 27(4), 581-597.
Woodley, E. (2009). Practical work in school science-why is it important. School Science Review, 91(335), 49-51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v3i1.23308
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
AIJBE is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License