Penggunaan POE-inqury melalui blended learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran materi sistem respirasi

Triara Noerhandayani, Suhara Suhara, Rini Solihat


The purposes of this research were to analyze the improvement of students’ learning outcomes after participating in learning the respiratory system using POE-Inquiry through Blended Learning by Google Classroom. The research used Quasy Experiment Method. The data in this research were collected using multiple-choice questions to find out students’ level of understanding and outcome. The questionnaire supports students’ responses to the lessons. The result shows that the teaching process using POE-Inquiry through Blended Learning by Google Classroom contribute and support the progress of student learning outcome, can be seen with the result of largest of N-gain score index: first of N-gain score as much as 22,2% low category; acquisition of second N-gain score as much as 44,4% in the high category; and third N-gain score as much as 66,7% in the medium category. The result of Mann-Whitney U test on the final posttest found that the p-value (0,548) is greater than α (0.05), so it can be concluded that does not have a significant difference between Blended Learning and without Blended Learning (full face to face). Nearly all students gave positive feedback on learning the respiratory system using POE-Inquiry through Blended Learning by Google Classroom.


POE-inquiry; blended learning; learning outcomes; respiratory system

Full Text:



Creswell, J. (2015). Riset Pendidikan: Perencanaan, Pelaksanaan, dan Evaluasi Riset Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Destiani, D. A. (2019). Pengaruh Blended Learning Berbasis Peoe Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Dan Respon Siswa SMA Pada Materi Sistem Ekskresi. 36–37.

Dewi, S. P., & Widodo, A. (2016). Analisis Konsepsi Siswa dalam Materi Sistem Respirasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 361–368.

Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2887–2908.

FIP-UPI, T. P. I. P. (2007). Ilmu dan Aplikasi Pendidikan (P. I. B. Utama (ed.)). Bandung.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Dept. of Physics, Indiana University.

Hamad, M. M. (2015). Blended Learning Outcome vs . Traditional Learning Outcome. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 3(4).

Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, M. C., Ho, H. Y., & Chen, Y. L. (2014). Using a “prediction-observation-explanation” inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their Internet cognitive failure. Computers and Education, 72, 110–120.

Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2017). An Exploration of Students’ Science Learning Interest Related to Their Cognitive Anxiety, Cognitive Load, Self-Confidence and Learning Progress Using Inquiry-Based Learning With an iPad. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1193–1212.

Hsiao, H. S., Chen, J. C., Hong, J. C., Chen, P. H., Lu, C. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2017). A five-stage prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based learning model to improve students’ learning performance in science courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3393–3416.

Khoiroh, N. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 97–110.

Kuantarto, E., & Asyhar, R. (2016). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning pada Aspek Learning Design Dengan Platform Media Sosial Online Sebagai Pendukung Perkuliahan Mahasiswa. Repository Universitas Jambi, 1–26.

Moiseienko, N. V., & Ozarko, I. I. (2019). Using mobile technology in learning english language. Вестник педагогики: наука и практика, (49), 82-84.

Muciaccia, M., & Amendola, D. (2017). Blended learning environments and active learning : an exploratory study in high school. Conference proceeding EMEMITALIA2017.

Nurhayati, D., Az-zahra, H. M., & Herlambang, A. D. (2019). Evaluasi User Experience Pada Edmodo Dan Google Classroom Menggunakan Technique for User Experience Evaluation in E-Learning ( TUXEL ) ( Studi Pada SMKN 5 Malang ). 3(4), 3771–3780.

Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Internet and Higher Education Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet and Higher Education, 1–9.

Pegg, J. M. (2006). Developing Explanations: Student Reasoning about Science Concepts during Claims- Evidence Inquiry Lessons. (Thesis).

Purwanto, M. N. (2008). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sani, Y., Sari, N. F., & Harahap, R. D. (2014). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Biologi di Kelas XI SMA Muhammadiyah 10 Rantauprapat 13. Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi STKIP Labuhanbatu, 1(3), 13–20.

Sinar. (2018). Metode Active Learning. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Talebian, S., Mohammadi, H. M., & Rezvanfar, A. (2014). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Higher Education: Advantages, Disadvantages, Conveniences and Limitations of Applying E-learning to Agricultural Students in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 300–305.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter View AIJBE Stats

Creative Commons License AIJBE is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License