Application of jigsaw cooperative learning type based on socio-scientific issues to improve argumentation skills on nervous system material
Abstract
The use of a jigsaw type cooperative learning model based on socioscientific issues in nervous system material can be used as a way to provide students with argumentation skills. This research aims to obtain information regarding the application of jigsaw type cooperative learning based on socioscientific issues in improving students' argumentation skills regarding the nervous system. This research uses classroom action research methods. The sample in this study was class XI students consisting of 36 people. The results of this research show that there is a significant difference in the average between before and after action research in argumentation skills. In cycle 1, the pretest score achieved argumentation level 1 (score 64.36), while in the posttest score achieved argumentation level 2 (score 72.75). After treatment in cycle 2, namely the application of jigsaw type cooperative learning based on socioscientific issues, it was able to improve students' argumentation skills. The posttest score achieved argumentation level of 3 (score 76.17) becomes a score of 80.39 with an argumentation level of 4. So, based on this classroom action research, the application of jigsaw type cooperative learning based on socioscientific issues and improves students' argumentation skills in nervous system material.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amalia, N. F., Riandi, R., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). Complexity of argumentation based on socio-scientific issues at elementary, middle school and high school levels. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 29–32.
Cahyaningtyas, D., Wardani, N. S., & Yudarasa, N. S. (2023). Upaya peningkatan hasil belajar dan sikap kerjasama siswa melalui penerapan discovery learning. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 13(1), 59-67.
Cavlazoglu, B., & Stuessy, C. (2018). Examining science teachers' argumentation in a teacher workshop on earthquake engineering. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(4), 348–361.
Chen, S. Y., Chu, Y. R., Lin, C. Y., & Chiang, T. Y. (2016). Students' knowledge of, and attitudes towards biotechnology revisited, 1995-2014: Changes in agricultural biotechnology but not in medical biotechnology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education: A Bimonthly Publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 44(5), 475–491.
Chowdhury, T., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2020). Socio-scientific Issues within science education and their role in promoting the desired citizenry. Science Education International, 31(2), 203–208.
Christenson, N., Gericke, N., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2017). Science and language teachers' assessment of upper secondary students' socio-scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(8), 1403–1422.
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students' informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy?. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421–1445.
Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christophers, L., & Rooney, B. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 21–27.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933.
Faridah, H. D., & Sari, S. K. (2019). Utilization of microorganisms on the development of halal food based on biotechnology. Journal of Halal Products and Research, 2(1), 33-43.
Foong, C. C., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2013). Students' argumentation skills across two socio-scientific issues in a confucian classroom: Is transfer possible?. International Journal of Science Education, 35(14), 2331–2355.
Friedrichsen, P. J., Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., & Zangori, L. (2021). Enacting co-designed socio-scientific issues-based curriculum units: A case of secondary science teacher learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(1), 85–106.
Glassner, A., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking?. Argumentation? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 10–18.
Hanegan, N. L., & Bigler, A. (2009). Infusing authentic inquiry into biotechnology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 393–401.
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students' interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743–757.
Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2015). Supporting use of evidence in argumentation through practice in argumentation and reflection in the context of the SOCRATES learning environment. Science Education, 99(2), 282–311.
Lindahl, M. G., & Lundin, M. (2016). How do 15–16 year old students use scientific knowledge to justify their reasoning about human sexuality and relationships?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 121–130.
Macagno, F., Mayweg-Pope, E., & Kuhn, D. (2015). Argumentation theory in education studies: coding and improving students' argumentative strategies. Topoi, 34(2), 523–537.
Manzuoli, C. H., Vargas, M. A., Erika, S. M., & Bedoya, D. (2019). Digital citizenship: A theoretical review of the concept and trends. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 10–18.
Namdar, B., & Shen, J. (2016). Intersection of argumentation and the use of multiple representations in the context of socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1100–1132.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.
Pauzi, R. Y., & Windiaryani, S. (2021). The critical thinking skills on global warming issue: Effect of the socio-scientific problems approach on problem-solving toward student’s. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14(2), 228-237.
Potter, P., & France, B. (2018). Informing a pedagogy for design and problem-solving in hard materials by theorizing technologists' learning experiences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 101–120.
Pratiwi, Y. N., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2016). Socio-scientific issues (SSI) in reaction rates topic and its effect on the critical thinking skills of high school students. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 164–170.
Probosari, R. M., Ramli, M., Harlita, H., Indrowati, M., & Sajidan, S. (2016). Profile of scientific argumentation skills of FKIP UNS biology education students in the plant anatomy course. Bioeducation: Journal of Biology Education, 8(2), 29-33.
Purwati, R., Suranto, S., Sajidan, S., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Problem-based learning modules with socio-scientific issues topics to closing the gap in argumentation skills. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 18(4), 35–45.
Rahmadhani, K., Priyayi, D. F., & Sastrodihardjo, S. (2020). Kajian profil indikator kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah pada materi zat aditif dan zat adiktif. Natural: Scientific Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 1-9.
Rosli, R., Goldsby, D., & Capraro, M. M. (2013). Assessing students' mathematical problem-solving and problem-posing skills. Asian Social Science, 9(16), 54–60.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socio-scientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4(1), 112–138.
Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socio-scientific issues in biology teaching: From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61.
Topçu, M. S., Foulk, J. A., Sadler, T. D., Pitiporntapin, S., & Atabey, N. (2018). The classroom observation protocol for socio-scientific issue-based instruction: development and implementation of a new research tool. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(3), 302–323.
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relationship between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior , 72 , 577–588.
Wüstenberg, S., Stadler, M., Hautamäki, J., & Greiff, S. (2014). The role of strategy knowledge for the application of strategies in complex problem solving tasks. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19, 127–146.
Yapıcıoğlu, A. E. (2018). Advantages and disadvantages of socio-scientific. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 5(2), 361–374.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v7i2.68809
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
AIJBE is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License