Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda PAT Genap Berorientasi HOTS Tema 6 Kelas V di SDN Pagedangan Ilir

Wulan Novita

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to see the quality of the items in theme 6 for fifth grade and this is based on a review of the validity of the questions, the reliability of the questions, the level of difficulty, discriminating power and effectiveness of distractors and to find out whether the questions of theme 6 are Higher Order Thinking Skill-oriented. Questions are declared good if they meet the conditions that have been set. Thinking is an activity in which a person manages his memory to solve a problem. This study uses a mixed method or mixed method, in which this mixed method connects qualitative and quantitative techniques in one study. The data collection technique uses documentation, namely collecting student answer sheets on theme 6 and the technique then the questions are then analyzed to determine the validity, reliability, discriminating power, level of difficulty, and effectiveness of the distractors using the Anates Version 4 application. using Bloom's Taxonomy table. Based on the analysis of the questions, there are 4 questions (20%) in the very good category, 4 questions (20%) in the good category, 5 questions (25%) in the very good category, 5 questions (25%) in the bad category and 2 items in the multiple choice theme. 6 bad categories. Based on the HOTS study of multiple choice items, Theme 6 of the 20 questions submitted based on Operational Verbs used in Bloom's taxonomy include 7 questions in group C1 (Knowing), 5 questions in group C2 (Understanding), 2 items questions in group C3 (Applying), 4 questions in group C4 (Analyzing) and 2 items in group C5 (Evaluating) there are no questions that are included in group C6 (Creating). So, out of 20 HOTS-oriented questions, there are 6 questions.


Keywords


Items Questions; Distractors; Higher Order Thinking Skills; Multiple Choice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abduh, M., & Istiqomah, A. (2021). Analisis muatan HOTS dan kecakapan abad 21 pada buku siswa kelas V tema ekosistem di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2069–2081. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1124

Azty, A. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Pendidikan Agama Islam berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Kelas V SD Budi Mulia Medan TP 2019/2020. (Doctoral dissertation). Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/10790/

Arifin, Z. (2016). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fanani, M. Z. (2018). Strategi pengembangan soal Hots pada Kurikulum 2013. Edudeena, 2(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v2i1.582

Muluki, A. (2020). Analisis kualitas butir tes semester ganjil mata pelajaran IPA Kelas IV MI Radhiatul Adawiyah. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i1.23335

Rohim, D. C. (2019). Strategi penyusunan soal berbasis HOTS pada Pembelajaran matematika SD. Brilliant: Jurnal Riset & Konseptual, 4(4), 436–446. http://dx.doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v4i4.374

Solichin, M. (2017). Analisis daya beda soal, taraf kesukaran, validitas butir tes, interpretasi hasil tes dan validitas ramalan dalam evaluasi pendidikan. Dirasat: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 192-213. https://doi.org/10.26594/dirasat.v2i2.879

Sugiyono, S. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprananto, K. (2012). Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Suryapuspitarini, B. K., Wardono, W., & Kartono, K. (2018). Analisis soal-soal matematika tipe higher order thinking skill (HOTS) pada kurikulum 2013 untuk mendukung kemampuan literasi siswa. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 876-884. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/prisma/article/view/20393




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/didaktika.v2i2.43661

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Didaktika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

 

This journal is indexed by