EFFECTIVENESS OF CRITICAL MULTILITERATION MODEL WITH RADEC MODEL ON THE ABILITY OF WRITING EXPLANATORY TEXT

Dadan Setiawan, Tatat Hartati, Wahyu Sopandi

Abstract


Abstract: Developing students' skill in writing scientific explanation is one of the main goals in education. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the critical multi-literation model and the RADEC model on the ability in writing explanatory text of elementary school students. This research is conducted on 5th grade students of SDN 122 Cijawura, Buah Batu, Bandung. The samples used in this study are 39 students in the experimental class 1 that used the critical multi-literation model and 38 students in the experimental class 2 that used the RADEC model. The research method used in this study is a quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group design. Based on the results of the study, it is found that the pre-test score in the experimental class 1 is 36.6 and the post-test result is 78. Whereas in the experimental class 2 the pre-test score obtained is 48.1 and the post-test score is 68.9. Furthermore, from the results of the independent sample test, the results of the post-test mean difference test are sig = 0.018, so it can be concluded that there are significant differences in the ability to write explanatory text of students between the experimental class 1 and the experimental class 2. Based on these results, the multi-literation model critical is more effective than the RADEC model in developing the ability in writing explanatory text in elementary school students.


Keywords


Writing explanatory text

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, Y. (2012). Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Abidin, Y. (2015). Pembelajaran Multiliterasi Sebuah Jawaban atas Tantangan Pendidikan Abad Ke-21 dalam Konteks Keindonesiaan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Akkaya, N., & Kirmizi, F. S. (2010). Relationship between attitudes to reading and time allotted to writing in primary education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 47424746.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.761.

Alexander, K. P., DePalma, M. J., & Ringer, J. M. (2016). Adaptive Remediation and the Facilitation of Transfer in Multiliteracy Center Contexts. Computers and Composition, 41, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.005.

Allison, E., & Goldston, M, J. (2018). Modern Scientific Literacy : A Case Study of Multiliteracies and Scientific Practices in a Fifth Grade Classroom, 27, 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9723-z.

Altas, B. (2014). A Case Study of Multimodal Presentation of Selected Stage Play Literature in a Multimedia Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1726–1734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.463.

Anderson, M & Anderson, K. (1997a). Text Types in English 1. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.

Andyani, N., Saddhono, K., & Mujyanto, Y. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Menulis Teks Eksplanasi Dengan Menggunakan Media Audiovisual Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Pengajarannya, 4 (2), pp. 161-174.

Bakry, M. S., & Alsamadani, H. A. (2015). Improving the Persuasive Essay Writing of Students of Arabic as a Foreign Language (AFL): Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.742.

Bonyadi, A., & Zeinalpur, S. (2014). Perceptions of Students Towards Self-selected and Teacher-assigned Topics in EFL Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.430.

Brinkley, M., et. al. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. dalam Griffin, P. Assesment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. New York: Springer.

Cahyani, I. (2012). Pembelajaran Menulis Berbasis Karakter dengan Pendekatan Experiental Learning. Bandung: Program Studi Pendidikan Dasar SPS UPI.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3th ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Dafit, F. (2017). Keefektifan Kemampuan Menulis Kreatif Siswa SD Dengan Model Pembelajaran Multiliterasi. Gerakan Aktif Menulis, 5, Hlm. 49-57.

Decker, S. L., Roberts, A. M., Roberts, K. L., & Stafford, A. L. (2016). Cognitive components of developmental writing skill, 53(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.

Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring How Text Work. Newtown: PETA.

Education Department of Western Australia. (1997a). Writing resource book. Port Melbourne: Henemann.

Emilia, E. (2012). Pendekatan Genre-Based dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris: Petunjuk untuk Guru. Bandung: Riqi Press.

Freire, P. (2005). Education for Critical Consciousness. London: Continuum.

Gerot, L. & Wignell. (1995). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler.

Giampapa, F. (2010). Multiliteracies, Pedagogy and Identities: Teacher and Student Voices rom a Toronto Elmentary School. Canadian Journal Of Education. 33,2 (2010). 407-431.

Graham, S., & Hall, T. E. (2016). Writing and Writing Difficulties from Primary Grades to College. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715592154.

Hartati, T. & Cuhariah, Y. (2015). Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Bandung: UPI PRESS.

Hesterman, S. (2011). A contested space: The dialogic intersection of ICT, multiliteracies, and early childhood. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2011.12.4.349.

Irianto, D. M., Herlambang, Y., & Yunansah, H. (2018). Multiliteration Model Based on Ecopedagogy Approach in Improving Ecological Intelligence and Developing Characters. Proceedings of International Conference on Elementary Education. Bandung: 19-20 September 2018. Hal. 135-142.

Iskandar, C. C., Abidin, Y., & Yunansah, H. (2016). Penggunaan Model Multiliterasi Kritis Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Menulis Karangan Argumentasi. Jurnal PGSD Kampus Cibiru, 4(3).

Iyer, R., & Luke, C. (2010). Multimodal, Multiliteracies: Text and Literacies for the 21st Century. Dalam Pullen & Cole (Eds.). Multiliteracies and Technology Enhanced Education: Social Practice and the Global Classroom. New York: Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global).

Joyce, B. Weil, M. & Calhoun, E. (2011). Models of Teaching. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Buku Guru Bahasa Indonesia Wahana Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Knapp, P & Watkins. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney: University of New South Wales.

Lagur, M. N. (2016). Kemampuan Menulis Teks Eksplanasi dengan Menggunakan Media Gambar Seri Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Turi, Sleman, Yogyakarta Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Skripsi Tidak Diterbitkan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Mahsun, (2014). Teks dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Morocco, C. C., et. al (2008). Supported Literacy for Adolescents: Transforming Teaching and Content Learning for The Twenty-First Century. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Awiley Imprint.

Navehebrahim, M. (2011). Multiliteracies Approach to empower learning and teaching engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 863–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.315.

Nurhalimah, S. (2016). Perbandingan Efektivitas Model Multiliterasi Kritis dan Model Menulis Otentik Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Teks Persuasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Skripsi Tidak Diterbitkan. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Özdemir, E., & Aydın, S. (2015). The Effects of Wikis on Motivation in EFL Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2359–2363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.241.

Pardo, L. S. (2006). The role of context in learning to teach writing: What teacher educators need to know to support beginning urban teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(4), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106291563.

Paul, D. (2007). Teaching English to Children in Asia. Hongkong: Pearson Education Asia Limited.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.

Priyatni, E.T. (2014). Desain Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Nomor 24, 2016, tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.

Rose, D. (2007). Reading to learn learning to read. Assessing Students Writing. Melbourne: Catholic Education Office of Melbourne.

Seah, L. H. (2015). Understanding the Conceptual and Language Challenges Encountered by Grade 4 Students When Writing Scientific Explanations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9464-z.

Silvers, P., Shorey, M., & Crafton, L. (2010). Critical literacy in a primary multiliteracies classroom: The hurricane group. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(4), 379–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798410382354.

Soltani, A., & Kheirzadeh, S. (2017). JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC STUDIES Exploring EFL students ’ use of writing strategies and their attitudes towards reading-to-write and writing-only tasks, 13(2), 535–560.

Sopandi, W. (2017). The quality improvement of learning processes and achievements through the read-answer-discuss-explain-and create learning model implementation. Proceeding 8th Pedagogy International Seminar 2017: Enhancement of Pedagogy in Cultural Diversity Toward Excellence in Education, 8(229), 132–139.

Sopandi, W., & Handayani, H. (2019). The Impact of Workshop on Implementation of (RADEC) Learning Model on Pedagogic Competency of Elementary School Teachers. International Conference of Innovation in Education (ICoIE) 178, pp. 7-11.

Susilo, S. & Ramdiati, T. (2019). Penerapan Model Multiliterasi Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Karangan Persuasi pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 5 (1), pp. 24-31.

Tarigan, H.G. (2013). Menulis Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v12i1.17445

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 EDUHUMANIORA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar

 

EduHumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar

Published in collaboration Program Studi PGSD UPI Kampus Cibiru

and

HDPGSDI

Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike license icon

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats