PARADOKS KELANCARAN DIGITAL DALAM PROGRAM PPG DALAM JABATAN: ANALISIS HAMBATAN TECHNOLOGY ASSISTED LEARNING BERDASARKAN KERANGKA ERTMER

Farahana Zahro Aini, Evi Fatimatur Rusydiyah

Abstract


Digital transformation within the In-Service Teacher Professional Education (PPG) program offers administrative efficiency, yet it potentially triggers technological shocks for educators in rural regions. This study aims to analyze the digital first-order and second-order barriers using Ertmer’s (1999) framework, as well as to map the TAL ecosystem through Joyce and Weil's (2009) Models of Teaching. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach with an exploratory design, this research involved 42 Islamic Religious Education (PAI) through voluntary response sampling. Data were collected through an online questionnaire consisting of closed-ended and open-ended questions, and were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014). The findings showed positive initial responses (85%–95%). However, qualitative analysis uncovers the phenomenon of the “Digital Smoothness Paradox” where significant constraints remain dominated by  external factors, including the complexity of UKIN video production (33.3%), unstable electricity and internet signals (21.4%), and hardware limitations (19.0%), which trigger internal barriers in the form of dua- role conflicts (16.7%) and technical anxiety before examinations (14.3%). The finding confirms that administrative success does not reflect the absence of barriers, but rather is determined by individual resilience and social coping strategies of teachers that mask structural pressures and infrastructure limitations in the field. As a policy implication, this study suggests a more adaptive assessment by considering teachers' dual workloads, psychological conditions, and digital infrastructure gaps, as well as providing affirmation for teachers in regions with limited network and technology access.

 

Digitalisasi program Pendidikan Guru Dalam Jabatan (PPG Daljab) Kementerian Agama mentransformasikan proses pembelajaran ke dalam ekosistem Technology Assisted Learning (TAL). Meski lebih efisien, kompleksitasnya berpotensi memicu goncangan teknologi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis hambatan digital first order dan second order barriers Ertmer (1999), serta memetakan ekosistem (TAL) melalui Models of Teaching Joyce dan Weil (2009). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif desain eksploratif terhadap 42 guru PAI melalui voluntary response sampling. Data dihimpun melalui kuesioner daring yang terdiri dari pertanyaan tertutup dan terbuka, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan model Miles, Huberman, dan Saldana (2014). Hasil menunjukkan respons positif pada skala tertutup (72%–95%), namun analisis kualitatif mengungkap fenomena "Paradoks Kelancaran Digital" di mana terdapat kendala signifikan yang didominasi faktor eksternal (first-order), meliputi rumitnya produksi video UKIN (33,3%), kendala listrik dan jaringan (21,4%), dan keterbatasan perangkat (19,0%), yang memicu hambatan internal (second-order) berupa konflik peran ganda (16,7%) dan kecemasan teknis (14,3%). Temuan ini menegaskan keberhasilan administratif tidak merefleksikan minimnya hambatan, melainkan ditentukan oleh resiliensi individu dan strategi koping sosial guru yang menyamarkan tekanan struktural dan keterbatasan infrastruktur di lapangan. Sebagai implikasi kebijakan, penelitian ini menyarankan penilaian yg lebih adaptif dengan menghitung beban kerja ganda guru, kondisi psikologis, dan kesenjangan infrastruktur digital, serta memberikan afirmasi bagi guru di wilayah dengan keterbatasan akses jaringan dan teknologi.


Keywords


Technology Assisted Learning; PPG Dalam Jabatan; Ertmer; hambatan digital; literasi digital;resiliensi.

References


Akour, M., & Alenezi, M. (2022). Higher education future in the era of digital transformation. Education Sciences, 12(11), 784.

Askerova, M. (2026). Psychological Foundations of Teacher Stress Management and Professional Well-Being in the Education System Abstract. Scientific Work, 20(2), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/126/43-48

Basatha, R., Prayoga, R. A. S., Akbar, M. S., Prayitno, E. D., Nikmah, M., Nusyura, F., Wirapraja, A., Ma’ady, M. N. P., & Fitrani, L. D. (2025). Systematic Literature Review on the Implementation of Game-Based Learning Management Systems through ClassDojo in Indonesian Education: A Focus on Parental Involvement and Teacher Readiness to Increase Student Learning Motivation. In D. N. I.K., H. W.-Y., B. A. R. Z.Z., S. M., de A. A.R., A.-G. A.J.A., de O. A.M., V. A., C. P.J., L. M.T., E. P. A., S. B., & B. I.G.P.A. (Eds.), E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 645). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564506006

Chang, Y. F., & Hu, Z. (2023). From Physical to Online Learning: The Digital Divide in Higher Vocational Education. In Improving Inclusivity in Higher Education: Addressing the Digital Divide in the COVID Pandemic (pp. 89–105). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5076-8_6

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597

Ghosh, S. (2024). Rehumanizing education in the age of technology. In Advances in Technological Innovations in Higher Education: Theory and Practices (pp. 1–15). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003376699-1

Handayani, T., Tiara, M. A., & Mansor, A. B. A. (2026). Effectiveness of using learning management system for pre-service primary school teachers. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026148

Hanun, F. (2021a). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) dalam Jabatan di LPTK UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung. Edukasi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan, 19(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v19i3.1158

Hanun, F. (2021b). Implementasi Penyelenggaraan Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) Pendidikan Agama Islam di LPTK UIN Serang Banten. Edukasi, 19(3), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v19i3.1158

Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching (8th ed.). Pearson/Allyn and Bacon Publishers.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Karacabey, M. F., Özkul, R., Polatcan, M., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2025). Transformational leadership and teacher burnout in Türkiye: The moderated mediation role of organisational support, teacher resilience and teacher workload. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432251346087

Karthik, V., & Ilavendhan, A. (2024). Enhancing Education Through Technology: A Critical Review of Computer-Assisted Learning. In S. Y., G. P.J.S., S. P.K., & K. M.H. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering: Vol. 1196 LNEE (pp. 323–340). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7862-1_22

Lodge, J. M. (2023). Misjudgements of Learning in Digital Environments. In Pedagogy and Psychology in Digital Education (pp. 239–247). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2107-2_14

Major, L., Francis, G. A., & Tsapali, M. (2021). The effectiveness of technology-supported personalised learning in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 1935–1964. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13116

Manurung, M. A. P., Chaniago, N. S., & Akhyar, S. (2024). EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM PPG DALAM JABATAN SECARA ONLINE DI LPTK UIN SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN. LOKAKARYA, 3(2), 177–182.

Miles, B.;, M., Huberman, & Michael, A. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Mulyana, R., Kurahman, O. T., & Fauzi, R. (2023). PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION AND MADRASAH TEACHER. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v0i0.23511

Murdiyanto, T. (2020). Persepsi peserta PPG dalam jabatan terhadap pelaksanaan program PPG hybrid learning bidang studi Matematika Universitas Negeri Jakarta tahun 2019. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 4(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.041.11

Quddus, A. (2019). Implementasi technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) dalam pendidikan profesi guru (PPG) PAI LPTK UIN Mataram. Jurnal Tatsqif, 17(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v17i2.1911

Sainz-Gómez, M., Ruiz-Melero, M. J., Chamorro-Troncos, C., & Bermejo García, R. (2026). Resilience in High Abilities: Keys to Overcoming Academic and Personal Challenges. Encyclopedia, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6030065

Syafitri, E., Nisa, K., Sirait, S., Rahmadani, E., & Rahayu, S. (n.d.). Analisis Kesulitan Pelaksanaan Perkuliahan PPG Dalam Jabatan Dalam Lingkup Kemendikbud. 5(1), 230–239.

Tsai, C.-C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). The “third”-order barrier for technology-integration instruction: Implications for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1057–1060. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.810

Verma, V., & Sameer, B. M. (2026). Learning, Unlearning, Relearning: Strategies for 21st Century Learners to tackle the Digital Learning Paradox. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(3), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.32674/v2j8aa74

Wang, F., Huang, P., Xi, Y., & King, R. B. (2025). Fostering resilience among university students: the role of teaching and learning environments. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01484-2

Xie, X., & Lu, C. (2025). Bridging the Digital Gradient: How Digital Literacy and Information Perception Shape Innovation and Entrepreneurship Across Urban, County and Township Students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17229942




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/e.v25i2.100729

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 EDUTECH

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Copyright © 2018 Edutech