PENGEMBANGAN ALAT UKUR KUALITAS HIDUP INDONESIA

Latifa Resmiya, Ifa Hanifah Misbach

Abstract


This research aimed to develop a Kualitas hidup measurement tool in Indonesia. The research method used in this study is a combined method of qualitative and quantitative research (mixed method). The qualitative stage aimed at exploring the theme of kualitas hidup totaling 250 people. Meanwhile, participants in the quantitative stage aimed at identifying psychometric properties (validity and reliability) numbered 759 people. The data analysis technique used for qualitative data is open coding. Quantitative data consists of construct validity test using factorial validity with exploratory factor analysis (EFA), convergent validity, and known-group validity, and estimation of internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's Alpha. The EFA results show that the Kualitas hidup Indonesia measuring instrument consists of 9 factors and 30 items with a very high reliability coefficient (α = 0.88). Convergent validity in this study was carried out by correlating the Kualitas hidup Indonesia measuring tool with the WHOQOL-BREF measurement tool. Validity by known-group is done by comparing demographic data of age, sex, marital status, education level, employment status, and health conditions using One-Way ANOVA

Keywords


Quality of life, factor analysis, convergent validity, known-group validity, reliability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anggoro, Wahyu J., & Widhiarso, Wahyu. (2010). Konstruksi dan Identifikasi Properti Psikometris Instrumen Pengukuran Kebahagiaan Berbasis Pendekatan Indigenous Psychology: Studi Multitrait-Multimethod. Jurnal Psikologi, Vol. 37, No. 2, 176-178.

Appulembang, Y. A., & Dewi. F. (2017). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Kualitas hidup Urban Community. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2017: hlm 272-277.

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Costanza, R., dkk. (2010). An Integrative Approach to Kualitas hidup Measurement, Research, and Policy. S.A.P.I.EN.S [Online], 1.1, connection on 13 December 2017.

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1-9.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. EuroQol Group. (2017, April 28th). EQ-5D Instruments. Retrieved December 13th, 2017, from EQ-5D: https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments.

Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286299. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286.

Grizans, J. (2009). Urban Issues and Solutions in the Context of Sustainable Development: A review of the literature. Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark.

Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd ed. revised). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Hunt, S. M. (1997). Editorial: The Problem of Kualitas hidup. Kualitas hidup Research, 6(3), 205-212.

Ihsan, H. (2013). Metode Skala Psikologi. Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Inoguchi, Takashi, & Fujii, Seiji. (2013). Kualitas hidup in Asia; A Comparison of Kualitas hidup in 29 Asian Societies, Springer.

Kim, Uichol, & Berry, John. (1993). Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. Cross-cultural research and methodology series, Vol. 17.

Laratmase, A. J. (2016). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Kualitas Hidup Nelayan: Suatu Studi Analisis Faktor dalam rangka Uji Validitas Konstruk di Karawang. Jurnal Pendidikan Lingkungan dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Vol. 17 No. 01.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1996). Budaya dan pengaruhnya terhadap budaya perusahaan Indonesia. Usahawan, No. 7, Juli.

Manning, Steven, G. (2015). The Development and Validation of A Measure of Disengagement. Thesis: Department of Psychology, Colorado State University.

Matsumoto, D. (1996). Culture and Psychology. Brook/Cole Publishing Company: Washington.

Moons, Philip., & dkk. (2004). Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the “Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Kualitas hidup – Direct Weighting" (SEIQoL-DW) in congenital heart disease. Health and Kualitas hidup Outcomes, 2: 27.

Molnar, P. (2009). Some Aspects of The Measurement and Improvement of Kualitas hidup. Diambil dari https://www.scribd.com/document/10203667/ SomeAspects-of-the-Measurement-and-Improvement-of-Quality-of-Life?from_email_ 04_ friend_send=1.

Mudey, A., dkk. (2011). Assessment of Kualitas hidup among Rural and Urban Elderly Population of Wardha District, Maharashtra, India. Ethno Med, 5(2): 8993.

Mujamiasih, Murti. (2013). Subjective Well-Being (SWB): Studi Indigenous Pada PNS dan Karyawan Swasta yang Bersuku Jawa di Pulau Jawa. Skripsi: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Oktapialdi, R. (2018). Pengembangan Skala Social Desirability. Skripsi: Departemen Psikologi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Post, Marcel., Witter, Luc., & Schrijvers, A.J.P. (1999). Kualitas hidup and the ICIDH: Towards an integrated conceptual model for rehabilitation outcomes research. Clinical rehabilitation. 13. 5-15. 10.1191/026921599701532072.

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2010). Introduction to Psychometric Theory. New York: Routledge.

Rural Alberta Development Fund (RADF). (2009). Kualitas hidup and community capacity population survey: Baseline results. Howard Research and Management Consulting Inc. Retrieved from: www.radf.ca/uploads/ qualityoflifesurvey75714.pdf.

Salim, O. Ch., dkk. (2007). Validitas dan reliabilitas World Health Organization Kualitas hidup-BREF untuk mengukur kualitas hidup lanjut usia. Universa Medicina, Vo. 26, No. 1.

Sekarwiri, Edesia. (2008). Hubungan Antara Kualitas Hidup dan Sense of Community pada Warga DKI Jakarta yang tinggal di daerah Rawan Banjir. Skripsi: Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Indonesia.

Sihombing, S. O., & Pongtuluran, F. D. (2011). Pengidentifikasian Dimensi-dimensi Budaya Indonesia: Pengembangan Skala dan Validasi. Retrieved 11 November 2018 http://www.academia.edu/1975261/Paper_Pengidentifikasian_Dimensi_Budaya_Indonesia_Pengambangan_ Skala_dan_Validasi.

Skevington, S. M., dkk. (2004). The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF kualitas hidup assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial, a report from the WHOQOL Group. Qual Life Res; 13: 299-310.

Springer. (2017, November 12th). Retrieved November 12th, 2017, from springerexemplar.com: http://www.springerexemplar.com/search.aspx?q=% 22quality%20of% 20life%22&similar=false.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (Edisi Revisi). Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House. Susilawati. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Kualitas Hidup Klien Kanker Payudara di RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Padang. Tesis: Universitas Andalas.

Suwartono, C. (2016). Alat Tes Psikologi Konteks Indonesia: Tantangan Psikologi di Era MEA. Journal Psikologi Ulayat, Vol. 3 No. 1.

Vahedi, Shahrum. (2010). World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF): Analyses of Their Item Response Theory Properties Based on the Graded Responses Model. Iran J. Psychiatry, 5:140:153.

Van Voorhis, C. R. W., & Morgan, Betsy. (2007). Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Size. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3 (2) 43-50. 10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043.

Wahl, Astrid K., & dkk. (2004). Kualitas hidup in the general Norwegian population, measured by the Kualitas hidup Scale (QOLS-N). Kualitas hidup Research, 13: 1001-1009.

Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care; 30: 473 – 483.

WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization Kualitas hidup Assessment (WHOQOL): Position Paper from the World Health Organization. Soc. Sci. Med. Vol. 41, No. 10, pp. 1403–1409.

WHOQOL Group. (1998a). The World Health Organization Kualitas hidup Assessment (WHOQOL): Development & General Psychometric Properties. Soc. Sci. Med. Vol. 46, No. 12, pp. 1569–1585.

WHOQOL Group. (1998b). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF kualitas hidup assessment. Psychol Med; 28: 551–558.

Xia, Ping., & dkk. (2012). Kualitas hidup of Chinese urban community residents: a psychometric study of the mainland Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12:37.

Yong, A. G., & Pearce, Sean. (2013). A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, Vo. 9 (2), p. 79-94.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JURNAL PSIKOLOGI INSIGHT: is published by Department of Psychology UPI Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.

 Lisensi Creative Commons

JURNAL PSIKOLOGI INSIGHT of Indonesia University of Education disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Berdasarkan ciptaan pada http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/insight/.