HUBUNGAN KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS DENGAN PENGUASAAN KONSEP SERTA KAITANNYA DENGAN GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD DEPENDENT-FIELD INDEPENDENT

Santy Awalliyah, Parsaoran Siahaan, Muhammad Gina Nugraha, Kartika Hajar Kirana

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini dilaksanakan untuk mengetahui hubungan keterampilan proses sains dengan penguasaan konsep siswa kelas VII terkait dengan gaya kognitif field dependent dan gaya kognitif field independent. Penelitian korelasional ini melibatkan 108 siswa kelas VII di salah satu SMPN di Kota Bandung. Keterampilan proses sains dan penguasaan konsep dievaluasi dengan menggunakan instrumen tes yang telah melalui proses judgement dan uji coba, sedangkan untuk mengklasifikasikan gaya kognitif siswa digunakan instrumen tes standar Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterampilan proses sains dengan penguasaan konsep memiliki hubungan yang signifikan untuk siswa kelas VII bergaya kognitif field dependent ( r (36) = 0,564, thitung > ttabel), sedangkan pada siswa bergaya kognitif field independent hubungan keterampilan proses sains dengan penguasaan konsep tidak signifikan ( r (38) = 0,431, thitung > ttabel).

ABSTRACT

The aim of this research was to find out correlation between science process skill and conceptual mastery of 7th grade students related to different cognitive style, i.e. field dependent and field independent. This study involves 108 students in one of public schools in Bandung. Science process skill and conceptual mastery were evaluated by test instruments, which were already validated and tested, while Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) was used to classify student's cognitive style. Results suggested that there was a significant correlation between science process skill and conceptual mastery for students with dependent cognitive style ( r (36) = 0,564, tvalue > ttable), while for students with independent cognitive style the correlation was insignificant ( r (38) = 0,431, tvalue > ttable).


Keywords


Keterampilan proses sains; penguasaan konsep; gaya kognitif; conceptual mastery; cognitive style; science process skills

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2009). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Edisi Revisi VI. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Reserch Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitatif Research. Edisi keempat. Boston: Pearson Education.

Dahar, R.W. (1989). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Demick, J. (2014). Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) Sampler Set Manual, Sample Figures and Scoring. California: Mind Garden, Inc.

Kenth, B. (2011). Difference in the Congnitive Styles and Learning Skills due to Gender and Area-Wise Differences. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Vol. 1 No.1, hlm. 87-100.

Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G.M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

Mutlu, M., & Temiz, B. (2013). Science process skills of students having field dependent and field independent cognitive styles. Educational Research and Reviews Vol. 8 No. 11, hlm. 766-776.

Nozari, A.Y., & Siamian, H. (2015). The Relationship between Field Dependent-Independent Cognitive Style and Understanding of English Text Reading and Academic Success. Mater Sociomed Vol. 27 No. 1, hlm. 39-41.

Ozgelen, S. (2012). Student’s Sciences Process Skills within a Cognitive Domain Framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Sciences, and Technology Vol. 8 No. 4, hlm. 283-292.

Onyekuru, B.U. (2015). Field Dependence-Independence Cognitive Style, Gender, Career Choice and Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students in Emohua Local Government Area of Rivers State. Journal of Education and Practice Vol. 6 No. 10, hlm. 76-85.

Riding, R.J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). Cognitive Style and Learning Strategies: some Impilications for Training design. International of training and Development Vol. 1 No.3, hlm. 199-208

Rustaman, N.Y. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FPMIPA UPI.

Shi, C. (2011). A Study of the Relationship between Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. Higher Education Studies, Vol. 11 No.1, hlm. 20-26.

Semiawan, C. (1986). Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko, E.L. (1997). Are Cognitive Style Still in Style?. American Psychologist Vol. 52 No. 7, hlm 700-712.

Tinajerol, C., Lemosll, S.M., Araujoll, M., Ferracesl, M.J., & Paramol, M.F. (2012). Cognitive style and learning strategies as factors which affect academic achievement of brazilian university students. Psicol. Reflex. Crit. Vol.25 No.1, hlm. 105-113.

Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R., & Cox, P.W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Independent Cognitive Style and Thei Educational Implication. Review of Educational Research Vol. 47 No.1, hlm 1-64.

Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., and Karp, S. A. (1971). A Manual for the Embedded Figures Tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36242

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36242.g15605

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats