STUDENT’S PERCEPTION ABOUT ASSESSMENT RELATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF 2013 CURRICULUM

Regina P. Octavianda, Nuryani Rustaman, Siti Sriyati

Abstract


ABSTRACT

The main focus of assessment is student, and how assessments are used will contribute to students’ perception. Students’ perception of assessment can be influenced by various types assessment, and Curriculum 2013 facilitate a variety of assessment for learning. Research about perception that involves 36 boys and 46 girls was conducted for identify students’ perception of assessment and the reconciliation with the demands of curriculum assessment in 2013. Data collected through the use of a questionnaire that was developed from perception indicators, i.e. reproducing knowledge, rehearsing, accountability, improving learning, problem solving, and critical judgement. This study placed improving learning perception in the first position and the rehearsing perception at the sixth position.About 85% of students consider that assessment can develop their knowledge, but only 52% of students consider that the assessment made them practice before the exam. Even though 2013 curriculum demands assessment which strongly supports six perceptions of students, in this study only few assessments criteria have been addressed. Research finding shows that only a few demands of the assessment has been completed. Therefore, high level of improving learning perception in this study is closely related to the reconciliation with the demands of Curriculum assessment in 2013 that involved types of assessments during the learning.

ABSTRAK

Pengguna utama asesmen adalah siswa, dan penggunaan asesmen secara tidak langsung akan membentuk suatu persepsi. Persepsi siswa terhadap asesmen didukung oleh berbagai variasi asesmen, dan Kurikulum 2013 memfasilitasi penggunaan beragam asesmen dalam pembelajaran. Penelitian tentang persepsi ini melibatkan 36 siswa dan 46 siswi bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi persepsi siswa terhadap asesmen dan kaitannya dengan tuntutan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner yang telah dikembangkan dari indikator persepsi siswa yaitu reproducing knowledge, rehearsing, accountability, improving learning, dan critical judgment. Penelitian ini menempatkan improving learning pada posisi pertama dan rehearsing pada posisi terakhir. Sebanyak 85% siswa menyatakan bahwa asesmen dapat mengembangkan pengetahuan mereka, namun hanya 52% siswa yang sepakat bahwa asesmen membuatnya menjadi rajin berlatih sebelum menghadapi ujian. Walaupun tuntutan penilaian Kurikulum 2013 memfasilitasi keenam persepsi siswa terhadap asesmen, namun alam penelitian ini hanya beberapa jenis asesmen saja yang terlaksana. Hasil temuan membuktikan bahwa hanya beberapa tuntutan asesmen yang dilakukan. Oleh karena itu, tingginya persepsi improving learning dalam penelitian ini sangat dekat kaitannya dengan tuntutan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013 yang digunakan selama pembelajaran.


Keywords


Curriculum 2013; purpose of assessment; student’s perception of assessment; kurikulum 2013; persepsi siswa terhadap asesmen; tujuan asesmen

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, G. T. L. & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2007). Students’ Perceptions of Assessment and Mathematics: Self- Regulation Raises Achievement. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, Vol. 7 No.1, pp. 63-74.

Brown, G. T. L. & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2008). Students’ perceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice Vol. 15 No.1, pp. 3–17.

Brown, G. T. L., Irving, S. E., Peterson, E. R., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2009). Use of interactive-informal assessment practices: New Zealand secondary students' perceptions of assessment. Learning and Instruction Vol. 19 No.2, pp. 97-111.

Brown, G. T. L. & Harris, L. (2012). Student perceptions of assessment by level of schooling: Further evidence for ecological rationality in belief systems. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology Vol. 12 No.12, pp.46-59.

Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 48 No.10, pp.1109-1136.

Cowie, B., Jones, A. & Otrel-Cass, K. (2011). Re-engaging students in science: Issues of assessment, funds of knowledge and sites for learning. International Journal of Science and mathematics Education Vol. 9 No.2, pp. 347-366.

Klausner and Alberts.(1996). National Science Education Standard (NAS).Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Lee, M.-H., Lin, T.-J.& Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Proving or improving science learning? Understanding high school students’ perceptions of science assessment in Taiwan. Science Education Vol. 97 No.2, pp. 244–270.

Klieger A. & Bar-Yossef, N. (2011). Professional development of science teachers as a reflection of large-scale assessment. International Journal of Science and mathematics Education Vol. 9 No.4, pp. 771-791.

Lin, T.-J., Lee, M.-H.& Tsai, C.-C. (2013). The commonalities and dissonances between high-school students’ and their science teachers’ perceptions of science learning and perceptions of science assessment: A Taiwanese sample study. International Journal of Science Education Vol. 36 No.3, pp. 382-405.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Permendikbud No. 66 Tahun 2013: tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Permendikbud.

Towndrow, P. A., Tan, A-L., Yung, B. H. W. & Cohen, L. (2010). Science teachers’ professional development and changes in sciece practical assessment practices: What are the issues. Research in Science Education Vol. 40 No.2, pp. 117-132.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36244

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36244.g15607

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats