Cover Image

The Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) on Argumentation Skills and Students' Concept Mastering of Human Excretory System Materials

Vita Riyanti, Yanti Hamdiyati, Widi Purwianingsih

Abstract


This study aims to determine the effect of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model on students' argumentation skills and mastery of concepts in human excretory system material, especially in the sub-material of kidney disorders. The research method used quasi-experimental with a group pretest-posttest design. The sample of this research was second-grade MIPA students in one of the high schools in Bandung, which consisted of 29 students in the experimental class and 25 students in the control class. The purposive sampling technique did the sampling. The study used some instruments, which consisted of a test of argumentation skills in the form of essay questions, an exam of mastery of concepts in the form of multiple choice, and a questionnaire on student responses to learning using the ADI learning model. The results showed that the ADI learning model had a more significant effect on argumentation skills in the experimental class than in the control class, with a significance value of 0.019. The quality of students' argumentation was at level 3. However, the ADI learning model did not significantly affect students' mastery of concepts in the excretory system material because a significant difference was not found between the pretest and posttest data in both research classes. Student response data shows students respond completely well to applying the ADI learning model. Therefore, the ADI learning model is recommended for biology teachers to improve students' argumentation skills and concepts mastery in other biological materials.

Full Text:

Download PDF

References


Admoko, S., Hanifah, N., Suprapto, N., Hariyono, E., & Madlazim, M. (2021). The implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model to improve scientific argumentation skills of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012046

Adriani, Y., & Riandi. (2015). Meningkatan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiri pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Di SMP Kelas VII [Improving Students' Mastery of Concepts Through Argument Driven Inquiry Learning in Integrated Science Learning in Class VII Junior High Schools}. Edusains, 7(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i2.1578

Akhmalia, N. L., Maharta, N., & Suana, W. (2018). Efektivitas Blended Learning Berbasis LMS dengan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri pada Materi Fluida Statis terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Siswa [The Effectiveness of LMS-Based Blended Learning with Inquiry Learning Models on Static Fluid Material on Students' Mastery of Concepts]. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah, 2(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v2i2.299

Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Metacognitive Argument-Driven Inquiry in Teaching Antimicrobial Resistance: Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60

Aprilanti, H., Qurbaniah, M., & Muldayanti, N. D. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Sistem Eksresi Manusia Kelas XI MIA SMA Negeri 4 Pontianak.[Identification of Students' Misconceptions on the Material of the Human Excretion System for Class XI MIA SMA Negeri 4 Pontianak]. Jurnal Biologi Edukation, 3(2), 63–77.

Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (2nd ed.) [Fundamentals of Educational Evaluation (2nd ed.)]. PT. Bumi Aksara.

Bekiroglu, F. O., & Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the relationship between engagement in scientific argumentation and conceptual knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1415–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9346-z

Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20446

Bulgren, J. A., Ellis, J. D., & Marquis, J. G. (2014). The Use and Effectiveness of an Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9452-x

Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2010). Biologi (W. Hardani & P. Andhika (eds.); 8th ed.). Penerbit Ernangga.

Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of argument-driven inquiry in laboratory instruction. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 15(1), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324

Divena, M. S., Hamdiyati, Y., & Aryani, A. (2021). Effectiveness of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) on students’ concept mastery and argumentation skills in reproductive system. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14(2), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.20513

Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187

Ekanara, B. (2014). Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMA (Studi tentang Keterampilan Pembentukan Klaim Mengenai Isu Sosio-Saintifik SMA pada Kelompok Budaya Sunda) [Argumentation Skills of High School Students (Study of Claim Formation Skills Concerning High School Socio-Scientific Issues in Sundanese Cultural Groups)]. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Ekanara, B., Adisendjaja, Y. H., & Hamdiyati, Y. (2018). Hubungan Kemampuan Penalaran Dengan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan Melalui Pbl (Problem Based Learning) [The Relationship between Reasoning Ability and Students' Argumentation Skills on the Concept of the Digestive System through PBL (Problem Based Learning)]. Biodidaktika, Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v13i2.3677

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012

Eymur, G. (2019). The influence of the explicit nature of science instruction embedded in the Argument-Driven Inquiry method in chemistry laboratories on high school students’ conceptions about the nature of science. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00135a

Farida, L., Undang, R. & Hasnunidah, N. (2018). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran argumentdriven inquiry (adi) terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa smp berdasarkan perbedaan jenis kelamin [The effect of applying the argument driven inquiry (ADI) learning model to the argumentation skills of junior high school students based on gender differences]. Journal of Physics and Science Learning, 2(2), 25-36.

Fatmawati, D. R., Harlita, & Ramli, M. (2018). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa melalui Action Research dengan Fokus Tindakan Think Pair Share. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 15(1), 253–259.

Förtsch, C., Werner, S., Dorfner, T., von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2017). Effects of Cognitive Activation in Biology Lessons on Students’ Situational Interest and Achievement. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9517-y

Harianto, Y. (2018). Analisis pengaruh penguasaan konsep dan literasi kuantitatif terhadap kualitas argumentasi siswa pada materi sistem koordinasi [Analysis of the influence of concept mastery and quantitative literacy on the quality of students' arguments in the coordination system material]. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Jayawardana, H. B. A. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Metode Guided Inquiry terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas X SMA N 2 Banguntapan [The Effect of Applying the Guided Inquiry Method to the Activities and Results of Biology Class X Students of SMA N 2 Banguntapan]. Jurnal BIoedukatika, 3(2), 1–8.

Kadayifci, H., & Yalcin-Celik, A. (2016). Implementation of Argument-Driven Inquiry as an Instructional Model in a General Chemistry Laboratory Course. Science Education International, 27(3), 369–390.

Kaunang, S. (2018). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kontekstual Dengan Metode Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar [Application of Contextual Learning with Inquiry Methods to Increase Motivation and Learning Outcomes]. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 4(1), 69–78.

Lu, S., Bi, H., & Liu, X. (2018). The effects of explanation-driven inquiry on students’ conceptual understanding of redox. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1857-1873.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Communication : The Process , Barriers , And Improving Effectiveness. Schooling, 1(1), 1–11.

Marhamah, O. S., Nurlaelah, I., & Setiawati, I. (2017). Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan di Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang [Application of the Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model in Improving Students' Arguing Ability on the Concept of Environmental Pollution in Class X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang]. Quagga : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 9(2), 39–45.

McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20430

Muhiddin, S. M. A. (2015). Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Pencemaran Lingkungan dengan Argument-Driven Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi dan Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa SMP [Integrated Science Learning on Environmental Pollution with Argument-Driven Inquiry to Improve Argumentative Ability and Curiosity of Junior High School Students.]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Muslim. (2011). Implementasi inovasi pembelajaran ipa berbasis inkuiri untuk menumbuh kembangkan keterampilan proses sains dan sikap ilmiah siswa melaui lesson study [Implementation of inquiry-based science learning innovations to develop students' science process skills and scientific attitudes through lesson study]. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 16(2), 99–108.

Noviyani, M., Kusairi, S., & Amin, M. (2017). Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran IPA dengan Inkuiri Berbasis Argumen [Mastery of Concepts and Arguing Ability of Middle School Students in Science Learning with Argument-Based Inquiry]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 974–978.

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Erduran, S. (2004). Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.

Paidi, P. (2020). Students’ Competence in Cognitive Process and Knowledge in Biology Based on Curriculum Used in Indonesia. International Journal of Intruction, 13(3), 491–510.

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Rendhana, I. wayan. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia [Developing 21st Century Skills in Chemistry Learning]. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 2239–2253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v13i1.17824

Ruhulessin, S., Ratumanan, T. G., & Tamalene, H. (2019). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X Sma Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Facilitator and Explaining (Sfe) Dan Model Pembelajaran Konvensional Pada Materi Trigonometri [Differences in Student Facilitator and Explaining (Sfe) Class X High School Cooperative Learning Models and Conventional Learning Models in Trigonometry Material]. JUPITEK: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol2iss1pp1-6

Safira, C. A., Hasnunidah, N., & Sikumbang, D. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Berkemampuan Akademik Berbeda [The Effect of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Learning Model on the Argumentation Skills of Students with Different Academic Abilities]. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(2), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v1i2.13046

Salsabila, E. R., Wijaya, A. F. C., Winarno, N., & Hanif, S. (2019). Using argument-driven inquiry to promote students’ concept mastery in learning global warming. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032052

Sampson, V., & Gerbino, F. (2010). Two Instructional Models That Teachers Can Use to Promote & Support Scientific Argumentation in the Biology Classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 72(7), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2010.72.7.7

Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). in Biology ARTICLE Argument-Driven Inquiry To Promote AB ? of the Understanding Important Concepts & Practices O ? ... students need THE AMERICAN ARGUMENT-DRIVEN. October, 71(8), 465–472.

Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Gleim, L., Grooms, J., Hester, M., Shoutherland, S., & Wilson, K. (2014). Argument-Driven Inquiry in Biology: Lab Investigations for Grades 9-12 (K. Reinburg, W. Rubin, A. Cooke, A. O’Brien, & A. America (eds.)). National Science Teacher Associations. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=jONrBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA24&lpg=PA24&dq=Writing+to+Learn+by+Learning+to+Write+During+the+School+Science+Laboratory:+Helping+Middle+and+High+School+Students+Develop+Argumentative+Writing+Skills+as+They+Learn+Core+Ideas&source=b

Saracaloglu, A. S., Aktamis, H., & Delioglu, Y. (2011). The impact of the development of prospective teachers’ critical thinking skills on scientific argumentation training and on their ability to construct an argument. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(4), 243–260.

Sari, R. A., Musthafa, B., & Yusuf, F. N. (2021). Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry Pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa. [Argument Driven Inquiry Learning on Temperature and Heat Materials to Improve Students ’ Scientific Argumentation Ability]. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 21(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v21i2.37134

Shanmugavelu, G., Parasuraman, B., Ariffin, K., Kannan, B., & Vadivelu, M. (2020). Inquiry Method in the Teaching and Learning Process. Shanlax: International Journal of Education, 8(3), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.34293/ education.v8i3.2396

Sumiyati, S., Yeni, L. F., & Marlina, R. (2016). Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Sub Materi Spermatophyta Kelas X [The Influence of the Inquiry Model on Student Learning Outcomes in Class X Spermatophyta Sub Material]. (Doctoral dissertation, Tanjungpura University).

Supriyati, E., Setyawati, O. I., Purwanti, D. Y., Salsabila, L. S., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Swasta di Sragen Pada Materi Sistem Reproduksi [Profile of Critical Thinking Skills of Private High School Students in Sragen on Reproductive System Material]. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 74–80.

Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern” analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031

Ubaque Casallas, D. F., & Pinilla Castellanos, F. S. (2016). Argumentation skills: A peer assessment approach to discussions in the EFL classroom. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 18(2), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n2.53314

Utomo, Y. S., Ashadi, & Sarwanto. (2019). Argumentation Skills Profile on 8th Grade Students using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern on Controversial topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 0–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012095

Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., & Zimmerman, C. O. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry: An introduction to a new instructional model for use in undergraduate chemistry labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(8), 1048–1056. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100622h

Widodo, A. (2006). Taksonomi Bloom dan Pengembangan Butir Soal [Bloom's Taxonomy and Item Development]. Buletin Puspendik, 3(2), 18–29.

Widodo, A. (2021). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam: Dasar-Dasar Untuk Praktik [Natural Science Learning: Fundamentals For Practice] (M. Iriany (ed.); 1st ed.). UPI PRESS.

Yolanda, S. E., Gunawan, G., & Sutrio, S. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Video Kontekstual Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik [The Effect of Contextual Video Assisted Guided Inquiry Learning Models on Students' Mastery of Physics Concepts]. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 5(2), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v5i2.1393.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i2.54634

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Vita Riyanti, Yanti Hamdiyati, Widi Purwianingsih

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Science Learning is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
in collaboration with the Indonesian Society of Science Educators
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia
Website: http://www.upi.edu
Email: js
learning@upi.edu
View My Stats