Revealing Fifth-Grade Students’ Understanding of the Universe

Fatma Coştu, Nesibe Firdevs Özdemir, Bayram Coştu

Abstract


Previous research has shown that students at almost all levels have misconceptions about both the shapes and sizes of celestial bodies in space. This study is essential to conduct on the students who take space topic in their schools for the first time This study aims at revealing fifth-grade students’ alternative conceptions about the size of the sun, earth, and moon and their relative positions to each other. This study employs action research by using a forced questionnaire and interview were used as the research instruments and involved 78 fifth-grade students as participants. To collect data, all students initially responded to a forced question questionnaire. Then, based on their responses, four students were chosen to be interviewed to clarify their alternative conceptions. The data analysis was carried out using interview and questionnaire data to reveal understanding and alternative conceptions of students’ responses. The results found that students had alternative conceptions of the earth’s shape in their minds. Moreover, alternative conceptions are commonly found in the sun, earth and moon positions.


Keywords


science education; alternative conceptions; sun; earth; moon

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, M. N. S., Nayan, N. A. M., & Hussin, F. M. (2017). A Study on Addressing Students’ Misconceptions About Condensation Using the Predict-Discuss-Explain-Observe-Discuss-Explain (PDEODE) Strategy. In A. L. Chandrasegaran, A. N. M. Zain, & M. Karpudewan (Eds.), Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions in Science: Strategies and Perspectives from Malaysia (pp. 51–69). Springer Singapore.

Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W., & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290203

Alexander, R. (2008). Culture, Dialogue and Learning: Notes on an Emerging Pedagogy. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes (pp. 91–114). SAGE Publications.

Brewer, W. F. (2008). Naïve Theories of Observational Astronomy: Review, Analysis, and Theoretical Implications. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change (pp. 155–204). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874813

Briggs, D. C. (2008). Comments on Slavin: Synthesizing Causal Inferences. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08314286

Cakici, Y., & Yavuz, G. (2010). The Effect of Constructivist Science Teaching on 4th Grade Students’ Understanding of Matter. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 1–19.

Dickinson, D. K., & Porche, M. V. (2011). Relation Between Language Experiences in Preschool Classrooms and Children’s Kindergarten and Fourth-Grade Language and Reading Abilities. Child Development, 82(3), 870–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01576.x

Driver, R. (1983). The Pupil as Scientist? Open University Press.

Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (2014). Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research Into Children’s Ideas. Routledge.

Eilks, I. (2013). Action Research in Science Education: A Twenty-year Personal Perspective. Action Research and Innovation in Science Education, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.0.50.173/arise/98909

Eilks, I. (2014). Action Research in Science Education: From General Justifications to a Specific Model in Practice. In T. Stern, A. Townsend, A. Schuster, & F. Rauch (Eds.), Action Research, Innovation and Change: International Perspectives Across Disciplines (pp. 156–176). Taylor & Francis.

France, A. (2021). Teachers Using Dialogue to Support Science Learning in the Primary Classroom. Research in Science Education, 51(3), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09863-3

Glynn, S. (2007). The Teaching-With-Analogies Model. Science and Children, 44(8), 52–55.

Guerra-Ramos, M. T. (2011). Analogies as Tools for Meaning Making in Elementary Science Education: How Do They Work in Classroom Settings? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75175

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Haglund, J., Jeppsson, F., & Andersson, J. (2012). Young Children’s Analogical Reasoning in Science Domains. Science Education, 96(4), 725–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21009

Hannust, T., & Kikas, E. (2007). Children’s Knowledge of Astronomy and Its Change in the Course of Learning. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.11.001

Hannust, T., & Kikas, E. (2010). Young Children’s Acquisition of Knowledge About the Earth: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.002

Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education. Cambridge University Press.

Major, J. S. (1993). Heaven and Earth in Early Han Thought: Chapters Three, Four, and Five of the Huainanzi. State University of New York Press.

Mali, G. B., & Howe, A. (1979). Development of Earth and Gravity Concepts Among Nepali Children. Science Education, 63(5), 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730630514

Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. Routledge. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=WGHAngEACAAJ

Nussbaum, J. (1979). Children’s Conceptions of the Earth as a Cosmic Body: A Cross Age Study. Science Education, 63(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730630113

Nussbaum, J., & Novak, J. D. (1976). An Assessment of Children’s Concepts of the Earth Utilizing Structured Interviews. Science Education, 60(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730600414

Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning Science: A Generative Process. Science Education, 67(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670406

Richland, L. E., & Simms, N. (2015). Analogy, Higher Order Thinking, and Education. WIREs Cognitive Science, 6(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1336

Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., Lindauer, I., & Joslin, P. (1989). Teachers’ Use of Analogies in Their Regular Teaching Routines. Research in Science Education, 19(1), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356869

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental Models of the Earth: A Study of Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W

Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., & Ikospentaki, K. (2004). Modes of Knowing and Ways of Reasoning in Elementary Astronomy. Cognitive Development, 19(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.12.002

Wells, A. (2011). Metacognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression. Guilford Publications.

Wells, G. (2015). Dialogic Learning: Talking our Way into Understanding. In T. Dragonas, K. J. Gergen, S. McNamee, & E. Tseliou (Eds.), Education as Social Construction: Contributions to Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 62–89). Taos Institute Publications.

White, R., & Gunstone, R. (2014). Probing understanding. Routledge.

Wong, D., Pugh, K., & the Dewey Ideas Group at Michigan State University. (2001). Learning Science: A Deweyan Perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<317::AID-TEA1008>3.0.CO;2-9




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i1.43660

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2022 Mimbar Sekolah Dasar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats