A Structured Fuzzy Framework for Risk Prioritization in Sustainable Food Supply Chains: Supporting the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through a Case Study in Indonesia

Dana Marsetiya Utama

Abstract


Effective risk assessment is vital for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in food supply chains where uncertainty and complexity are prevalent. This study proposes a structured fuzzy framework that combines the Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy Best Worst Method (Fuzzy BWM) to identify, evaluate, and prioritize sustainability-related risks. A case study conducted in Indonesia involved expert insights from various sectors within the food supply chain. The Fuzzy Delphi Method was used to screen and validate relevant risks, while Fuzzy BWM enabled the prioritization of these risks across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. The results reveal that economic-related risks are of primary concern, followed by critical risks in the social and environmental domains. This framework improves decision-making accuracy by managing uncertainty and providing a clear basis for prioritizing actions. The findings offer practical guidance for companies seeking to strengthen their sustainability strategies and contribute meaningfully to SDGs through more resilient and responsible supply chain managemen.

Keywords


Fuzzy BWM; Fuzzy delphi; Risk assessment; Supply chain; Sustainable

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ibrahim, M. F., Putri, M. M., and Utama, D. M. (2020). A literature review on reducing carbon emission from supply chain system: drivers, barriers, performance indicators, and practices. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 722(1), 012034.

Ibrahim, M. F., Laurensia, T., & Utama, D. M. (2023). Integration AHP and MOORA for sustainable supplier selection during the COVID-19 pandemic era: A case study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2674(1), 030012.

Mansur, A., Handayani, D. I., Wangsa, I. D., Utama, D. M., and Jauhari, W. A. (2023). A mixed-integer linear programming model for sustainable blood supply chain problems with shelf-life time and multiple blood types. Decision Analytics Journal, 8, 100279.

Jauhari, W. A., Kenlaksita, D. N., Kurdhi, N. A., and Utama, D. M. (2025). An optimization framework for sustainable closed-loop supply chains with green investment and recovery policy. Supply Chain Analytics, 11, 100146.

Kutanga, N. A. A., Garside, A. K., & Utama, D. M. (2023). A hybrid method for mitigation strategy on palm oil supply chain: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 34(1), 1–11.

Kot, S. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in small and medium enterprises. Sustainability, 10(4), 1143.

Mubin, A., Utama, D. M., and Nusantara, R. C. (2022). Manufacturing sustainability assessment comprising physical and mental workload: An integrated modified SVSM and AHP approach. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 7(1), 407–417.

Dewi, S. K., Febrianti, R., and Utama, D. M. (2023). An integrated method for manufacturing sustainability assessment in the tire industry: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 16(1), 1–12.

Utama, D. M., & Abirfatin, M. (2023). Sustainable Lean Six-Sigma: A new framework for improving sustainable manufacturing performance. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 17, 100700.

Rosiani, T. Y., Utama, D. M., Ummudiyah, A. Y., and Amallynda, I. (2024). Sustainable manufacturing assessment using sustainable VSM and AHP involving workload and machine efficiency: A case study in Indonesian paving block production. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 4(3), 2049–2071.

Edunjobi, T. E. (2024). Sustainable supply chain financing models: Integrating banking for enhanced sustainability. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research Updates, 7(2), 1–11.

Saputro, T. E., Figueira, G., and Almada-Lobo, B. (2023). Hybrid MCDM and simulation-optimization for strategic supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 219, 119624.

Gadgil, M. (2024). The role of green supply chain management in enhancing corporate sustainability performance. Universal Research Reports, 11(4), 175–180.

Thorlakson, T., De Zegher, J. F., and Lambin, E. F. (2018). Companies’ contribution to sustainability through global supply chains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(9), 2072–2077.

Masudin, I., Zuliana, P. E., Utama, D. M., and Restuputri, D. P. (2024). Assessment and risk mitigation on halal meat supply chain using fuzzy best-worst method (BWM) and risk mitigation number (RMN). Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(3), 842-865.

Utama, D. M., Dewi, S. K., and Antika, M. D. (2025). A new framework for risks mitigation halal food supply chain: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 16, 2800-2816.

Tummala, R., and Schoenherr, T. J. (2011). Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 474–483.

Chopra, S., and Sodhi, M. J. (2004). Supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53–61.

Asrol, M., Yani, M., and Taira, E. J. (2021). Risk management for improving supply chain performance of sugarcane agroindustry. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 20(1), 9–26.

Eskandarpour, M., Dejax, P., Miemczyk, J., and Péton, O. (2015). Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review. Omega, 54, 11–32.

Soyer, A., Bozdag, E., Kadaifci, C., Asan, U., and Serdarasan, S. (2023). A hesitant approach to sustainable supply chain risk assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 138103.

Zaporowska, Z., and Szczepański, M. (2024). The application of environmental, social and governance standards in operational risk management in SSC in Poland. Sustainability, 16(6), 2413.

Liu, H.-C., You, J.-X., Chen, S., and Chen, Y.-Z. (2016). An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty. IIE Transactions, 48(11), 1027–1042.

Rostamzadeh, R., Ghorabaee, M. K., Govindan, K., Esmaeili, A., and Nobar, H. B. K. (2018). Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-CRITIC approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 651–669.

Giannakis, M., and Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 455–470.

Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, S., Shaffiee Haghshenas, S., Memarpour Ghiaci, A., Guido, G., and Vitale, A. (2023). Road safety assessment and risks prioritization using an integrated SWARA and MARCOS approach under spherical fuzzy environment. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(6), 4549–4567.

Jahanvand, B., Mortazavi, S. B., Mahabadi, H. A., and Ahmadi, O. (2023). Determining essential criteria for selection of risk assessment techniques in occupational health and safety: A hybrid framework of fuzzy Delphi method. Safety Science, 167, 106253.

Settembre-Blundo, D., González-Sánchez, R., Medina-Salgado, S., and García-Muiña, F. E. (2021). Flexibility and resilience in corporate decision making: A new sustainability-based risk management system in uncertain times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22, 107–132.

Khoruzhy, L. I., Katkov, Y. N., Katkova, E. A., Khoruzhy, V. I., and Dzhikiya, M. K. (2022). Opportunities for the application of a model of cost management and reduction of risks in financial and economic activity based on the OLAP technology: The case of the agro-industrial sector of Russia. Review of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 8.

Ummi, N., Ferdinant, P. F., Irman, A., and Gunawan, A. (2018). Integration house of risk and analytical network process for supply chain risk mitigation of cassava opak chips industry. In MATEC Web of Conferences, 218, 04022.

Rochmoeljati, R., Dewi, S., and Azizah, C. D. (2022). Risk analysis in the supply chain of cane sugar industry in Sidoarjo. MATEC Web of Conferences, 372, 08001.

Tuncel, G., and Alpan, G. (2010). Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks: A case study. Computers in Industry, 61(3), 250–259.

Khan, S., Khan, M. I., Haleem, A., and Jami, A. R. (2022). Prioritising the risks in Halal food supply chain: An MCDM approach. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(1), 45–65.

Mukherjee, S., De, A., and Roy, S. (2024). Supply chain risk prioritization: A multi-criteria based Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 41(6), 1693–1725.

Seuring, S., and Müller, M. J. (2008). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management–A Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(8), 455–466.

Asrol, M., Yani, M., and Taira, E. J. (2020). Supply chain fair profit allocation based on risk and value added for sugarcane agro-industry. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 150–165.

Afroozi, M. A., Gramifar, M., Hazratifar, B., Jowkar, S., Razavian, S. B., Keshvari, M. M., and Bojnourdi, E. Z. (2024). Risk assessment in lithium-ion battery circular economy in sustainable supply chain in automotive industry using gray degree of possibility in game theory and MCDM. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 10, 1362200.

Xu, Ming, Yuanyuan Cui, Meng Hu, Xinkai Xu, Zhechi Zhang, Sai Liang, and Shen Qu. 2019. Supply chain sustainability risk and assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 857-867.

Alshehri, S. M. A., Jun, W. X., Shah, S. A. A., and Solangi, Y. A. (2022). Analysis of core risk factors and potential policy options for sustainable supply chain: An MCDM analysis of Saudi Arabia’s manufacturing industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(17), 25360–25390.

Aqlan, F., and Lam, S. S. (2015). A fuzzy-based integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 54–63.

Dong, Q., and Cooper, O. (2016). An orders-of-magnitude AHP supply chain risk assessment framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 144–156.

Mzougui, I., Carpitella, S., Certa, A., El Felsoufi, Z., and Izquierdo, J. (2020). Assessing supply chain risks in the automotive industry through a modified MCDM-based FMECA. Processes, 8(5), 579.

Abdel-Basset, M., Gunasekaran, M., Mohamed, M., and Chilamkurti, N. (2019). A framework for risk assessment, management and evaluation: Economic tool for quantifying risks in supply chain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 90, 489–502.

Hsu, C., Yang, J., Chang, A., and Liu, G. (2024). A new hybrid MCDM approach for mitigating risks of hazardous material road transportation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 21(3), 4210–4240.

Saputro, T. E., Rosiani, T. Y., Mubin, A., Dewi, S. K., and Baroto, T. (2024). Green supplier selection under supply risks using novel integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 449, 141788.

Saputro, T. E., Rosiani, T. Y., Mubin, A., Dewi, S. K., and Baroto, T. (2024). Green supplier selection under supply risks using novel integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 449, 141788.

Utama, D. M., Amallynda, I., Wardana, R. W., Rosiani, T. Y., Anggriani, R., and Wijaya, D. S. (2026). A new hybrid fuzzy decision model for barrier identification and strategy prioritization in circular rice supply chains: A case study in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 11(2), 89788.

Bui, T. D., Tsai, F. M., Tseng, M.-L., and Ali, M. H. (2020). Identifying sustainable solid waste management barriers in practice using the fuzzy Delphi method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 154, 104625.

Sarkar, B., Sarkar, M., Ganguly, B., and Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2021). Combined effects of carbon emission and production quality improvement for fixed lifetime products in a sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107867.

Yontar, E., and Zengin, Ş. (2023). Identifying and analyzing the risk factors of sustainable supply chain management in textile sector. Beykent Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(1), 7–20.

Khokhar, M., Iqbal, W., Hou, Y., Abbas, M., and Fatima, A. (2020). Assessing supply chain performance from the perspective of Pakistan’s manufacturing industry through social sustainability. Processes, 8(9), 1064.

Elmsalmi, M., Hachicha, W., and Aljuaid, A. M. (2021). Prioritization of the best sustainable supply chain risk management practices using a structural analysis based-approach. Sustainability, 13(9), 4608.

Majumdar, A., Shaw, M., and Sinha, S. K. (2020). COVID-19 debunks the myth of socially sustainable supply chain: A case of the clothing industry in South Asian countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 150–155.

Govindan, K., Shaw, M., and Majumdar, A. (2021). Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123075.

Ngo, V. M., Quang, H. T., Hoang, T. G., and Binh, A. D. T. (2024). Sustainability-related supply chain risks and supply chain performances: The moderating effects of dynamic supply chain management practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 839–857.

Fan, D., Lo, C. K. Y., and Zhou, Y. (2021). Sustainability risk in supply bases: The role of complexity and coupling. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 145, 102175.

Bhuwalka, K., Kirchain, R. E., Olivetti, E. A., and Roth, R. (2023). Quantifying the drivers of long-term prices in materials supply chains. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 27(1), 141–154.

Zanjani, M. E., Najafi, A., Naghilou, A., and Mohammadi, N. (2021). Identification and assessment of critical risks of sustainable supply chain in the Iranian lead and zinc industry. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 32(3), 1–22.

Basnur, J., Putra, M.F.F., Jayusman, S.V.A., and Zulhilmi, Z. (2024). Sustainable packaging: Bioplastics as a low-carbon future step for the sustainable development goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal for Science and Engineering in Materials, 3(1), 51-58.

Sesrita, A., Adri, H.T., Suherman, I., Rasmitadila, R., and Fanani, M.Z. (2025). Production of wet organic waste ecoenzymes as an alternative solution for environmental conservation supporting sustainable development goals (SDGs): A techno-economic and bibliometric analysis. ASEAN Journal for Science and Engineering in Materials, 4(2), 245-266.

Henny, H., Budi, A.H.S., Andriyansyah, M., Ar Rozzak, M.R., Baru, M.M., and Masek, A. (2025). Hazard identification, risk assessment, and determining control (HIRADC) for workplace safety in manufacturing industry: A risk-control framework complete with bibliometric literature review analysis to support sustainable development goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal for Science and Engineering in Materials, 4(2), 267-284.

Syahrudin, D., Roestamy, M., Fauziah, R.S.P., Rahmawati, R., Pratidina, G., Purnamasari, I., Muhtar, S., and Salbiah, E. (2026). Techno-economic analysis of production ecobrick from plastic waste to support sustainable development goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal for Science and Engineering in Materials, 5(1), 9-16.

Apriliani, A., Waahyudin, C., Ramdani, F.T., Martin, A.Y., Syahrudin, D., Hernawan, D., and Salbiah, E. (2026). Techno-economic analysis of sawdust-based trash cans and their contribution to Indonesia’s green tourism policy and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal for Science and Engineering in Materials, 5(1), 17-36.

Ragadhita, R., Nandiyanto, A.B.D., Farobie, O., Kurniawan, T., and Bilad, M.R. (2026). Definition and role of sustainable materials in reaching global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) completed with bibliometric analysis. ASEAN Journal for Science and Engineering in Materials, 5(1), 53-100.

Al-Obaidi, A.S.M. (2026). The Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology (JESTEC): A bibliometric insight into materials research trends and innovation to support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal for Science and Engineering in Materials, 5(1), 101-122.

Xing, G., Chano, J., Thadanatthaphak, Y., and Wu, C.C. (2025). Physical adaptation of college students in high-altitude training: Empirical findings and curriculum development insights to support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(2), 215-236.

Imaniyati, N., Ratnasari, C.D., and Adman, A. (2025). Enhancing job satisfaction through human resource information systems and communication: A commitment-based approach to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in education-oriented organizations. ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(2), 237-254.

Di, R., Sawangboon, T., and Chano, J. (2025). Enhancing innovative thinking through a theory-based instructional model in design education to support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(3), 311-332.

Wiyanarti, E., and Nurjannah, A.N. (2026). Influence of self-efficacy on affective learning outcomes in social studies education toward achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(1), 1-18.

Yu, X., Chano, J., and Wongsaphan, M. (2026). Enhancing occupational identity and self-efficacy through a self-education model in art and design education aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(1), 19-46.

Nurjamin, A., Nurjamin, L.R., Fajriah, Y.N., Nurjamin, A.K., and Firdaus, H.A. (2026). Integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based multimodal learning in education to enhance literacy aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(1), 71-88.

Abduh, A., Achmad, S.F., Syam, C., Samad, S., Arham, M., Mustafa, M., and Pandang, A. (2026). Dataset on the number of schools, teachers, and students in Sulawesi, Indonesia: kindergarten, primary, junior, senior high, vocational, and Islamic boarding schools with educational access, quality, and cultural implications to solve challenges and strategies in education management and support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(1), 89-116.

Haq, M.R.I., Nurhaliza, D.V., Rahmat, L.N., and Ruchiat, R.N.A. (2024). The influence of environmentally friendly packaging on consumer interest in implementing zero waste in the food industry to meet sustainable development goals (SDGs) needs. ASEAN Journal of Economic and Economic Education, 3(2), 111-116.

Maulana, I., Asran, M.A., and Ash-Habi, R.M. (2023). Implementation of sustainable development goals (SDGs) no. 12: Responsible production and consumption by optimizing lemon commodities and community empowerment to reduce household waste. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education, 2(2), 141-146.

Nurnabila, A.T., Basnur, J., Rismayani, R., Ramadhani, S., and Zulhilmi, Z. (2023). Analysis of the application of mediterranean diet patterns on sustainability to support the achievement of sustainable development goals (SDGs): Zero hunger, good health and well beings, responsible consumption, and production. ASEAN Journal of Agricultural and Food Engineering, 2(2), 105-112.

Awalussillmi, I., Febriyana, K.R., Padilah, N., and Saadah, N.A. (2023). Efforts to improve sustainable development goals (SDGs) through education on diversification of food using infographic: Animal and vegetable protein. ASEAN Journal of Agricultural and Food Engineering, 2(2), 113-120.

Rahmah, F.A., Nurlaela, N., Anugrah, R., and Putri, Y.A.R. (2024). Safe food treatment technology: The key to realizing the sustainable development goals (SDGs) zero hunger and optimal health. ASEAN Journal of Agricultural and Food Engineering, 3(1), 57-66.

Keisyafa, A., Sunarya, D.N., Aghniya, S.M., and Maula, S.P. (2024). Analysis of student’s awareness of sustainable diet in reducing carbon footprint to support sustainable development goals (SDGs) 2030. ASEAN Journal of Agricultural and Food Engineering, 3(1), 67-74.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v6i1.89868

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering (AJSE) is published by UPI 

View My Stats