DIMENSIONS OF DESIGN COMPETENCE IN FIRST-STAGE ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS
Abstract
Evaluating the design skills of first-stage architecture students is crucial in determining their proficiency and growth in the field. The lack of emphasis on key dimensions of design competence for first-stage architecture students in many universities often results in students being underprepared for the next stages of their education. This article adopted the method of comparison between the final projects submitted by the students in different university to express the competence of the students in the design. The assessment encompasses various aspects of design competence, including creativity, problem-solving abilities, conceptual thinking, spatial organization, use of design principles, and presentation skills. The evaluation methodology incorporates a combination of methods such as design portfolio analysis, design process evaluation, design critiques, problem-solving tasks, and knowledge assessments. By employing this multifaceted approach, educators can gain a holistic understanding of the students' design abilities. The article emphasizes the importance of considering both the process and the final design outcomes in evaluating students' skills, acknowledging that growth and learning occur throughout the design journey. The findings from this assessment can inform targeted instructional strategies and interventions to enhance the design skills of first-stage architecture students. Ultimately, this comprehensive evaluation approach contributes to fostering the development of competent and proficient architects during their early stages of architectural education.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, E., & Iano, J. (2014). Fundamentals of building construction: materials and methods. John Wiley & Sons.
Barton, M. A. (2010). Assessing design thinking in undergraduate architecture students: applying design problem protocol analysis. Journal of Architectural Education, 64(4), 245-256.
Ching, F. D., & Binggeli, C. (2014). Interior design illustrated. John Wiley & Sons.
Cho, Y. K., & Kwon, S. (2013). Assessing design thinking and its learning outcome in an architectural design studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 67(2), 170-179.
Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, D. H. (2017). Assessing creativity: Supporting creativity in the classroom and beyond. Creative Education Foundation Press.
Darwish, Mohamed., Kamel, Shaimaa., Assem, Ayman (2023). Extended reality for enhancing spatial ability in architecture design education. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14 (6), 102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.102104
Dikmenli, M. (2011). Conceptual design as an educational framework in architectural education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3357-3362.
Fox, M. A., & Kemp, M. L. (2009). Learning from the design studio: A review of literature in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 63(2), 47-57.
Francis Ching, D. K. (2014). Architecture: Form, space, and order. John Wiley & Sons.
Habraken, N. J. (2002). The structure of the ordinary: Form and control in the built environment. MIT Press.
Hemdan, J.T., Taha, D.S., Cherif, I.A (2023). Relationship between personality types and creativity: A study on novice architecture students. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 6, 847-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.09.041.
Laseau, P. (2017). Graphic thinking for architects and designers. John Wiley & Sons.
Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. Architectural Press.
Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Routledge.
Porter, T. (2011). Presentation skills for architects. Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jare.v6i1.76805
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Architectural Research and Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






