PENGGUNAAN AKUNTANSI FORENSIK DALAM PENYELESAIAN KASUS KEPAILITAN

R. Nelly Nur Apandi, Yudha Pradista

Abstract


This research aim to know how bankrupt process and applying of forensic accountancy in bankrupt.  Besides to know constraints any kind of faced in applying forensic accountancy in finishing case of bankrupt. This study uses qualitative methods. Informant this research consists of curators, civil servant, forensic accountants and Auditors.Result of this research indicate that forensic accountancy have role in assisting to finish case of bankrupt. This matter can be seen from some process or step is solving of case of done bankrupt in justice of commercial needing forensic accountancy. The first, checking off receivable and liability at litigation to prove that debtor really is having of debt to all creditor so that ascertain justice in deciding bankrupt an company. Second, enumeration of bankruptasset to data exist in document, financial statement, and debtor boldness with direct inspection in field. Third, checking off receivable and liability at the time of creditor meeting to know really conducted receivable and liability amount in agreement between creditor and debtor. Fourth, at the time of division of bankrupt asset to ascertain sequence of is division of between separatist creditor, preferential, and congruence seen the existence of guarantee or do not at the time of agreement of receivable and liability. Fifth, detecting the existence of indication of fraud that happened at case of bankrupt.


Keywords


Forensic Accounting, Bankrupt and Constraint

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albrecht, W. Steve dan Chad O. Albrecht. 2003. Fraud Examination. Ohio: South-Western.

Amin Widjaja Tunggal. 2012. Forensic & Investigative Accounting Pendekatan Kasus. Jakarta: Harvarindo.

Arens, Alvin et al. 2008. Auditing dan Jasa Assurance. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ayu Prima Sandi. 2013. BPKP Targetkan 50 Auditor Forensik Baru. Tempo (Online). Tersedia: http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2013/04/11/ 087472658/BPKP-Targetkan-50-Auditor-Forensik-Baru (23 Agustus 2013)

Bungin, Burhan. 2010. Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana.

Cahyani, Ajeng R. 2012. Memahami Audit Forensik. (Online). Tersedia: http://www.jtanzilco.com/main/index.php/component/content/article/1-kap-news/841-memahamiauditforensik. Hotml (18 Mei 2013)

Dian Dara Swarna. 2012. Penerapan Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigasi dalam Mendeteksi Fraud di Lingkungan Digital. Skripsi. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Franceschetti, Bruno Maria and Claudia Koschtial. 2013. Do Bankrupt Companies Manipulate Earning More Than The Non-Bankrupt Ones?.Journal of Finance and Accountancy.

Indra Sastrawat. 2011. Akuntansi Forensik dalam Kasus Century. Kompas (Online). Tersedia: http://ekonomi.kompasiana.com/moneter/2011/02/19/akuntansi-forensik-dalam-kasus-century-341211.html (23 Agustus 2013)

J. Tanzil. 2011. Efektivitas Akuntan Forensik Dalam Membantu Mengungkap Korupsi di Indonesia. (Online). Tersedia: http://www.jtanzilco.com/main/index.php/component/content/article/1-kap-news/31-akuntatan-forensik (25 Agustus 2013)

Jumansyah, dkk. 2011. Akuntansi Forensik dan Prospeknya Terhadap Penyelesaian Masalah-Masalah Hukum di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional “Problematika Hukum dalam Implementasi Bisnis dan Investasi (Perspektif Multidisipliner)”.

Luqman Hakim. 2007. Analisis Pemantauan Outcome Program Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Gresik. Tesis. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Maria Yuniar. 2013. Ini Penyebab Batavia Air Dinyatakan Pailit. Tempo (Online). Tersedia: http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2013/01/30/090458040/Ini-Penyebab-Batavia-Air-Dinyatakan-Pailit (20 Juni 2013)

Moleong, Lexy J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nina Kasih Puspita. 2009. Kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga Untuk Mengadili Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Kurator Dalam Pengurusan Harta Pailit. Tesis. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Purhantara, Wahyu. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Untuk Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Ratih Siti R. 2011. Pengaruh Penerapan Akuntansi Forensik Terhadap Kompetensi Bukti Tidak Pidana Korupsi. Skripsi. Bandung: Universitas Padjadjaran.

Rezaee, Zabihollah and Riley Richard. 2010. Financial Statement Fraud: Prevention and Detection Second Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Siti Kurnia Rahayu dan Ely Suhayati. 2010. Auditing Konsep Dasar dan Pedoman Pemeriksaan Akuntan Publik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sembiring, Sentosa. 2006. Hukum Kepailitan Dan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang Terkait Dengan Kepailitan. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.

Shubhan, M. Hadi. 2012. Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Singleton, Tommie W. dan Aaron J. Singleton. 2010. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting Fourth Edition. New Jersey: Wiley.

Sugiyono. 2010.MetodePenelitianPendidikan (PendekatanKuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

_______. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutedi, Adrian. 2009. Hukum Kepailitan. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Tuanakotta, Theodorus M. 2007. Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

______________________. 2013. Mendeteksi Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1998 tentang penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1998.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Usman, Rachmadi. 2004. Dimensi Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

www.pn-jakartapusat.go.id




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v2i2.6587

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats