Opini Audit Going Concern: Kajian Berdasarkan Kualitas Audit, Kondisi Keuangan, Audit Tenure, Ukuran Perusahaan, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya pada Perusahaan yang Mengalami Financial Distress pada Perusahaan Manufaktur (Studi pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2010-2015)
Abstract
The main purposes of this reseach is to examine the effect of audit quality, company’s financial condition, audit tenuree, company size, company’s growth and audit opinion prior year meeting on acceptance of going concern opinion of manufacturing firm listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2010-2015.
Samples are obtained by sampling purposive method and based on the criteria, 37 companies were chosen as the samples of this study. The logistic regression used to examine the factors that are predicted to affect the probability of acceptance of going concern audit opinion. The result of this reseach is that the previous years audit opinion and the company’s financial condition had a significant influence on the audit going concern opinion and the other hand such us audit quality, audit tenuree, company size, company growth do not significantly influence to the going concern opinion. .
Key Word: audit quality, company’s financial condition, audit tenuree, company size, company’s growth, audit opinion prior year
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1988. The Auditor’sConsiderations of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going-Concern - Statement on Auditing Standards No.59. Auditing Standards Board (ASB).
Altman, E. I. 1968. Financial Ratios Discriminant Analysis and The Prediction of Corporate Bankrupcy. Journal of Finance, 23 (4), hal. 589-609.
Altman, E dan McGough, T., 1974. Evaluation of A Company as A Going Concern.Journal of Accountancy. December. 50-57.
ArensA.,Randal J. Elder, dan Mark S. Beasley. 2006. Auditing dan Jasa Assurance : Pendekatan Integrasi (Alih Bahasa: Herman Wibowo). Jilid 1Edisi Keduabelas. Penerbit Erlangga: Jakarta.
Astuti, Irtani Retno dan Darsono.2012. Pengaruh Faktor Keuangan Dan Non Keuangan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. DiponegoroJournal Of Accounting,vol. 1 No.2:1-10.
Barlian, Nanda Raisa dkk. 2014. Pendapat Going Concern: AnalisisFaktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi pada Perusahaan yang Mengalami Financial Distress (Studi pada Perusahaan Mnaufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2010-2013). SNA 17 Mataram, Lombok. Universitas Mataram.
Ballesta, J. P. S. dan Garcia, M. E. 2005. Audit Qualifications and Corporate Governance in Spanish Listed Firm.Managerial Auditing Journal, 20 (7), hal. 725-738.
Berle, A. dan Means, G. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan
Brigham, E. F. dan Daves, P. R. 2004. Intermediate Financial Management (8th Edition).Thomson South-Western.
Carcello dan Neal, T. L. 2000. Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting.The Accounting Review,75 (4), hal. 453-467.
Chen, K.C. dan Church, B. K. 1992. Default on Debt Obligations and The Issuance of Going-Concern Report. Auditing: Journal Practices and Theory, hal. 30 – 49.
Chen, K. dan Church, B. 1996. Going Concern Opinions and the Market Reaction to Bankruptcy Filings. The Accounting Review, 71 (1), hal. 117-128.
Chen, R. R., Lin, H. C., dan Long, M. 2012. The Deferred Default Problem of Myopic Going Concern Practice.
Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., dan Taylor, S. L. 1995. Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations.Journal of Accounting and Economics,20 (3), hal. 297-322.
Dewayanto, Totok. 2011. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Opini audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Fokus ekonomi. Vol 6,No. 1 Juni 2011.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, hal. 183–199.
Fanny, M. dan Saputra, S. 2005. Opini Audit Going Concern: Kajian Berdasarkan Model Prediksi Kebangkrutan, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, dan Reputasi Kantor Akuntan Publik (Studi Pada Emiten Bursa Efek Jakarta).Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VIII, hal. 966-978.
Fleck, S. dan Wilson, E. 1994. The Incremental Information Content of the Going Concern Opinion. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 9, hal. 149-166.
Geiger, M. A. dan Blay, A. D. 2007. Auditor Fees and Auditor Independence: Evidence from Going Concern Reporting Decisions.
Ghozali, L 2009. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: BadanPenerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gujarati, D. N. 2003. Basic Econometrics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. 2001. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Januarti, Indira dan Ella Fitrianasari. 2008. Analisis Rasio Keuangan Dan Rasio Non Keuangan Yang Mempengaruhi Auditor Dalam Memberikan Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Auditor Dalam Memberikan Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Auditee. Jurnal Maksi Vol.8 No.1 Januari 2008, hal 43-58.
Jensen, M. C., dan Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics,3 (4), hal. 305-360.
Junaidi, dan Hartono, J. 2010. Faktor Nonkeuangan pada Opini Going Concern. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII, hal. 1-23.
Knechel, W. R., dan Vanstraelen, A. 2007. The Relationship between Auditor Tenure and Audit Quality Implied by Going Concern Opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 26 (1), hal. 113–131.
McKeown, J. R., Mutchler, J. F., dan Hopwood, W. 1991. Toward an Explanation of Auditor Failure to Modify the Audit Reports of Bankrupt Companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. Supplement: 1-13.
Mutchler, J. 1985. A Multivariate Analysis of The Auditors Going Concern Opinion Decision. Journal of Accounting Research.
Mutchler, J. F., Hopwood, W. dan McKeown, J. M. 1997. The Influence of Contrary Information and Mitigating Factors on Audit Opinion Decisions on Bankrupt Companies. Journal of Accounting Research, 35 (2), hal. 295-310.
Mulyadi. 2002. Auditing.Edisi Pertama Jilid Dua. Salemba Empat: Semarang.
Munawir, S. 1999. Analisis Informasi Keuangan. Edisi Pertama Cetakan Pertama. Penerbit Liberty: Yogyakarta.
Nasir, N. M. dan Abdullah, S. N. 2004. Voluntary Disclosure and Corporate Governance among Financially Distressed Listed Firms in Malaysia. Financial Reporting, Regulation, and Governance.
Petronela, T. 2004. Pertimbangan Going Concern Perusahaan dalam Pemberian Opini Audit. Jurnal Balance, hal. 47-55.
Praptitorini, M. D. dan Januarti, I. 2007. Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Debt Default, dan Opinion Shopping terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going Concern. Simposium NasionalAkuntansi X, hal. 1-25.
Ramadhnay, Alexander. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Opini Going Concern pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Mengaami Finacial Distress di Bursa Efek Jakarta. 2004. Tesis Magister Akuntansi Program Pascasarjana. Universitas Diponegoro: Semarang.
Rahman, A. dan Siregar, B. 2012. Faktor - faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XV, hal. 1-37.
Ross et. Al. 2002. Corporate Finance, 5th.Mc GrawHill.
Rudyawan, A. P. dan Badera, I. D. N. 2009. Opini Audit Going Concern: Kajian Berdasarkan Model Prediksi Kebangkrutan, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Leverage, dan Reputasi Auditor. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 4 (2), hal. 1-17.
Sandra, Dessy dan Indra Wijaya Kusuma. 2004.Reaksi Pasar Terhadap TindakanPerataan Laba Dengan Kualitas Auditor Dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Proceeding Simposium NasionalAkuntansi VII.
Santosa, A. F. dan Wedari, L. K. 2007. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. JAAI, 11 (2), hal 141 – 158.
Schwartz, Mel. M.. 1997. Composite Material Processing. Fabrication and Applications.Vol II. New Jersey : Prencitice Hall, Inc.
Sekaran, U. 2011. Research methods for business (metodologi penelitian untuk bisnis). 4th ed.Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Sekaran, Uma dan Roger Bougie. 2010.Edisi 5. Research Method for Busines:A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley Sons: New York.
Setiawan, S. 2006. Opini Going Concern dan Prediksi Kebangkrutan Perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, V (1), hal. 59-67.
Setyarno, E. B., Januarti, I. dan Faisal. 2006. Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi IX.
Setyowati, W. 2009. Overview: Perkembangan Standar Audit yang Relevan dengan Keputusan Opini Going Concern. Kajian Akuntansi, 1 (1), hal. 58-68.
Singh, S. dan Singla. N. 2011. Fresh Food Retail Chains in India-Organization and Ismpacts. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.
Sujoko dan Soebiantoro, U. 2007. Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Saham, Leverage, Faktor Intern dan Faktor Ekstern Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan: Studi Empirik Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur dan Non Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 9 (1), hal. 41-48.
Susanto, Y. K. 2009. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Publik Sektor Manufaktur. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 11 (3), hal. 155-173.
Sutton, M. H. 1997. Auditor Independence: The Challenge of Fact and Appearance. Accounting Horizons, 1, hal. 86-91.
Wallace, W. A. 2004. The Economic Role of The Audit in Free and Regulated Markets: A Look Back and a Look Forward. Research in Accounting Regulation, 17, hal. 267–298.
Wardhani, R. 2013. The Role of Audit Quality in Enhancing the Market Consequences of Increased Voluntary Disclosure in Different Context of Accounting Standards: Cross Country Analysis in Asia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVI, hal. 18 – 48.
Weston, J. F. dan Copeland, T. E. 1992. Managerial Finance. Dryden Press.
www.idx.co.iddiakses pada tanggal 2 Februari 2016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v6i1.8937
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats