Story-based teaching as a pedagogical strategy to foster critical literacy in language learning contexts

Risa Triarisanti, Didin Samsudin

Abstract


Although many teachers claim to value the teaching of critical thinking, the questions and activities they design often remain at the level of literal comprehension and rarely progress toward deeper analytical engagement. This study explores story-based teaching as an instructional approach to foster critical literacy in language-learning contexts. In response to the demands of 21st-century education, critical literacy is viewed as an integration of knowledge construction, critical thinking, social awareness, ethics, and cross-cultural competence, skills needed to analyse how texts shape power relations and social meanings. Using a qualitative design, the study analyses children’s story texts and synthesizes theoretical and empirical literature to formulate an instructional model for critical literacy. The story analysis identified nine rhetorical moves and fourteen steps that characterize well-structured narratives for classroom use. The literature review led to a four-stage pedagogical framework: preparation, critical reading and discussion, critical response and application, and assessment and reflection. This framework enables students to understand narratives, question dominant ideologies, and produce counter-responses linked to real-world issues. The outcomes include a draft model of story-based critical literacy instruction and plans for publication and further research.


Keywords


critical literacy, language learning, pedagogical strategy, story-based teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afful, J. B., & Nkansah, N. B. (2018). A move analysis of personal statements written by Ghanaian university students. Language, Discourse & Society, 6(1), 84–101.

Aldabbus, S., & Almansouri, E. (2022). Academic writing difficulties encountered by university EFL learners. British Journal of English Linguistics, 10(3), 1–11.

Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160

Bonsu, E. M., & Adusei, D. K. (2023). Trending technologies: A corpus-based genre analysis of abstracts on ChatGPT. Linguistic Initiative, 3(2), 107–124.

Borràs, J., & Llanes, À. (2021). Re-examining the impact of study abroad on L2 development: A critical overview. The Language Learning Journal, 49(5), 527–540.

Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Wineburg, S., Rapaport, A., Carle, J., Garland, M., & Saavedra, A. (2021). Students’ civic online reasoning: A national portrait. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211017495

British Council Indonesia Foundation. (n.d.). Bagaimana menulis personal statement untuk beasiswa (How to write a personal statement for scholarships). Retrieved January 28, 2025, from https://www.britishcouncilfoundation.id/english/articles/personal-statement

Brown, R. M. (2004). Self-composed: Rhetoric in psychology personal statements. Written Communication, 21(3), 242–260.

Chiu, Y. L. (2015). Personal statement in PhD applications: Gatekeepers' evaluative perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 63–73.

Chiu, Y. L. (2016). ‘Singing your tune’: Genre structure and writer identity in personal statements for doctoral applications. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 48–59.

Dahur, A. J., & Solosumantro, H. (2024). Tantangan dan penerapan literasi digital dalam pendidikan transformatif manusia di era post-truth (Challenges and implementation of digital literacy in transformative human education in the post-truth era). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI), 5(2), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.52060/jipti.v5i2.2476

Damrongmanee, M. (2016). The artist statement as a genre: Move analysis with pedagogical aims. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 9(2), 83–104.

Ding, H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 368–392.

Donato, R., & Adair-Hauck, B. (2016). Foreign language education research and the classroom: Constructing a hybrid pedagogy. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 1–12.

Fajardo, A. C. (2015). Critical literacy practices in the classroom: A literature review. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(1), 71–79.

Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 44–58.

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249.

Geng, H., Nimehchisalem, V., Zargar, M., & Mukundan, J. (2024). A comparison of rhetorical move analysis by GPT-4 and humans in abstracts of Scopus-indexed tourism research articles. International Linguistics Research, 7(2), 1–12.

Gong, Y., Gao, X., Li, M., & Lai, C. (2021). Cultural adaptation challenges and strategies during study abroad: New Zealand students in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(4), 417–437.

Haji, G. (2023). Self-promotion and identity construction in graduate personal statements. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 60–70.

Harsiati, T. (2018). Literasi dalam konteks pembelajaran di Indonesia (Literacy in the learning context in Indonesia). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang Press.

Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2012). Performance in the citing behavior of two student writers. Written Communication, 29(1), 55–103.

Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Işık-Taş, E. E. (2019). The statement of purpose in graduate program applications: The impact of academics’ feedback on L2 writer identity. In N. Kenny, E. E. Işık-Taş, & H. Jian (Eds.), English for specific purposes instruction and research: Current practices, challenges and innovations (pp. 177–200). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. New York: Routledge.

Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kim, M., & Lu, X. (2024). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT for rhetorical move-step analysis: The impact of prompt refinement, few-shot learning, and fine-tuning. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 101422.

Kohnke, L. (2023). L2 learners' perceptions of a chatbot as a potential independent language learning tool. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 17(1–2), 214–226.

Li, Y., & Deng, L. (2019). I am what I have written: A case study of identity construction in and through personal statement writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 70–87.

Lubis, A. H. (2024). Potential uses and concerns of ChatGPT in EFL academic writing classrooms: A preliminary portrait. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 21(3), 698–710.

Lubis, A. H., Samsudin, D., Triarisanti, R., Jerusalem, M. I., & Hwang, Y. (2024). A bibliometric mapping analysis of publications on the utilization of artificial intelligence technology in language learning. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 38(1), 156–176.

Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory Into Practice, 51(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324

Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29.

McManus, K., Mitchell, R., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2021). A longitudinal study of advanced learners’ linguistic development before, during, and after study abroad. Applied Linguistics, 42(1), 136–163.

Netz, N. (2021). Who benefits most from studying abroad? A conceptual and empirical overview. Higher Education, 82(6), 1049–1069.

OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836

Restianty, A. (2018). Literasi digital, sebuah tantangan baru dalam literasi media (Digital literacy, a new challenge in media literacy). Gunahumas: Jurnal Kehumasan, 1(1), 72–87. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/gunahumas/article/view/28380

Rose, D. (2013). Genre in the Sydney School. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis (pp. 209–226). London: Bloomsbury.

Salmaso, D. (2017). Teaching story genres for literacy development. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 13(2), 85–96.

Samraj, B., & Monk, L. (2008). The statement of purpose in graduate program applications: Genre structure and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 193–211.

Serafini, F., & Reid, S. F. (2020). Crossing boundaries: Exploring metaleptic transgressions in contemporary picturebooks. Children's Literature in Education, 51(2), 261–284.

Sun Education Group. (2024, May 17). Contoh personal statement bahasa Inggris beasiswa luar negeri (Examples of English personal statements for overseas scholarships). Retrieved from https://suneducationgroup.com/app/sun-media-app/contoh-personal-statement-schoarship/#contoh_personal_statement_bahasa_inggris_beasiswa_luar_negeri

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Whatley, M., Landon, A. C., Tarrant, M. A., & Rubin, D. (2021). Program design and the development of students’ global perspectives in faculty-led short-term study abroad. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(3), 301–318.

Yu, D. (2025). Towards LLM-assisted move annotation: Leveraging ChatGPT-4 to analyse the genre structure of CEO statements in corporate social responsibility reports. English for Specific Purposes, 78, 33–49.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jokal.v6i1.92796

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Journal of Korean Applied Linguistics published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.