Karakterisasi Instrumen Sustainability Consciousness pada Topik Energi Dengan Analisis Model Rasch

Hana Bunga Ghieny, Harun Imansyah, Winny Liliawati

Abstract


Penelitian mengenai penerapan Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) di sekolah telah banyak dilakukan. Namun sejauh ini, ketersediaan instrumen sustainability consciousness masih terbatas dan memiliki kelemahan sehingga kurang sesuai jika diterapkan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyusun dan mengkarakterisasikan instrumen sustainability consciousness yang diharapkan sesuai pada kondisi siswa Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan metode kuantitatif deskriptif dengan desain penelitian menggunakan desain konstruksi dan validasi. Pengambilan data menggunakan teknik survei dengan teknik analisis data menggunakan model Rasch. Hasil penelitian menunjukan nilai validitas isi rata-rata yaitu sebesar 0,98 (sangat baik), validitas konten item untuk tingkat kesesuaian butir seluruh item dapat diterima, nilai validitas konstruk keseluruhan dapat diterima, dan nilai validitas skala peringkat untuk skala 1 hingga 4 dapat dipahami responden. Nilai reliabilitas cronbach alpha sebesar 0.63 (cukup), reliabilitas item sebesar 0,98 (sangat baik), reliabilitas responden sebesar 0,63 (cukup). Tingkat kesukaran item dikelompokan dari yang sulit disetujui, sedang, dan mudah disetujui berdasarkan nilai mean dan standar deviasi. Responden tidak menunjukan keberagaman yang baik sehingga terdapat beberapa item yaitu P7, S1, S5, S7, dan S8, yang memiliki nilai diskrimasi yang rendah. Namun, instrumen sustainability consciousness tidak memiliki item outliers atau item yang tidak dapat digunakan dan perlu dibuang.

Kata kunci: Energi, ESD, Sustainability Consciousness

 

ABSTRACK

Research on the application of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in schools has been widely carried out. However, so far, the availability of the sustainability consciousness instrument is still limited and has weaknesses so that it is not suitable for application in Indonesia. This study aims to develop a sustainability consciousness instrument which is expected to be suitable for the condition of Indonesian students and to characterize the sustainability consciousness instrument on the topic of energy. This research uses descriptive quantitative method with research design using construction design and validation. Collecting data using survey techniques with data analysis techniques using the Rasch model. The results showed that the average content validity value was 0.98 (very good), the item content validity for the suitability level of all items was acceptable, the overall construct validity value was acceptable, and the rating scale validity value for a scale of 1 to 4 was understandable. respondents. Cronbach alpha reliability value is 0.63 (enough), item reliability is 0.98 (very good), respondent reliability is 0.63 (enough). The level of difficulty of items is grouped from those that are difficult to agree with, moderate, and easy to agree on based on the mean and standard deviation. Respondents do not show good diversity, so there are several items, namely P7, S1, S5, S7, and S8, which have low discrimination values. However, the sustainability consciousness instrument does not have outliers or items that cannot be used and need to be discarded.

Keywords: Energy, ESD, Sustainability Consciousness


References


Atmaca, A. C., Kiray, S. A., & Pehlivan, M. (2019). Development of a Measurement Tool for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6, 80-91.

Biasutti, M., & Frate, S. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the Attitudes toward Sustainable Development scale. Environmental Education Research, 214-230.

Biasutti, M., & Surian, A. (2012). The Student's Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies: A Comparison among Faculties. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 75-82.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

D. Olsson, N., S., G. &., & Rundgren, N. C. (2016). The Effect of Implementation of Education for Sustainable Development in Swedish Compulsory Schools – Assessing Pupils’ Sustainability Consciousness. Environmental Education Research, 176-202.

Fisher, R. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of consumer research, 303-315.

Gericke, N., Pauw, J. B.‐d., Berglund, T., & Olsson, D. (2018). The Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire: The theoretical development and empirical validation of an evaluation instrument for stakeholders working with sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 35-49.

Hassan, A., Noordin, T. A., & Sulaiman, S. (2010). The status on the level of environmental awareness in the concept of sustainable development amongst secondary school students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 1276-1280.

Ilma, N. (2015). Peran Pendidikan sebagai Modal Utama Membangun Karakter Bangsa. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 3, 82-87.

Indrawan, R. (2020). Hingga Akhir 2020, Pertumbuhan Konsumsi Listrik Diproyeksi Minus 6,25%. Retrieved from Dunia Energi: https://www.dunia-energi.com/hingga-akhir-2020-pertumbuhan-konsumsi-listrik-diproyeksi-minus-625/

Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2012). Sustainable Energi dan Ketahanan Energi Nasional. Retrieved from Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia: https://kemlu.go.id/portal/id/read/102/halaman_list_lainnya/krisis-energi

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan . (2020). Peta Jalan Pendidikan Indonesia 2020 - 2035. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Lissitz, R. W., & Samuelsen, K. (2007). A Suggested Change in Terminology and Emphasis Regarding Validity and Education. Educational Researcher, 437-448.

Listiawati, N. (2011). Relevansi Nilai-Nilai ESD dan Kesiapan Guru dalam Mengimplementasikannya di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 135-152.

Michalos, A. C., Creech, H., Swayze, N., & Kahlke, P. M. (2012). Measuring Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours Concerning Sustainable Development among Tenth Grade Students in Manitoba. Social Indicator Research, 213-238.

Morrison. (2012). Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta: Kencana.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Sudjana, N., & Ibrahim. (1989). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta CV.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch dalam Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (edisi revisi). Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

TribunMataram. (2020). Naiknya Tagihan Listrik Meski Penggunaan Berkurang di Tengah Pandemi Virus Corona, Ini Penjelsan PLN. Retrieved from TribunMataram.com: https://mataram.tribunnews.com/2020/06/18/naiknya-tagihan-listrik-meski-penggunaan-berkurang-di-tengah-pandemi-virus-corona-ini-penjelsan-pln

UNESCO. (2009). Review of Contexts and Structures for Education for Sustainable Development. In D. Coordinatio. Perancis: UNESCO.

Wibisono, S. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Validasi Instrumen Pengukuran Fundamentalisme Agama bagi Responden Muslim. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia.

WWF-Indonesia. (2015). Perjalanan Education for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from WWF-Indonesia: https://www.wwf.or.id/?42042/Perjalanan-Education-for-Sustainable-Development-di-Indonesia-dalam-Perspektif-LSM.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v6i1.32455

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Hana Bunga Ghieny, Harun Imansyah, Winny Liliawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Journal Wahana Pendidikan Fisika http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/WapFi/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

The Journal WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika).

All rights reserverd. pISSN 2338-1027 eISSN 2685-4414

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)