WAPFI is Nationally Accredited by kemdikbudristek The journal is classified into national's 4th highest cluster for reputable journal in Indonesia No SK: 177/E/KPT/2024 From: Vol 6 No 2 2021 Until: Vol 11 No 1 2026
ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN INSTRUMEN TES BERBASIS RANKING TASK DAN URAIAN DALAM MENGUKUR PRESTASI BELAJAR FISIKA SISWA
Aditya Putra Wiguna, Agus Fani Chandra Wijaya, Andhy Setiawan
Abstract
Reffer to the background study on 25 students in one of senior high school in Cimahi and interview with one of physics teacher about test, show that 80% of students revealed usual form of matter that they get is multiple choice tests, whereas 20% of students revealed usual form of matter that they get is essay test. In this situation, 60% of the way students answer the test in collusion with their partner, 28% of the way students answer test with cheating to their partner, whereas remaining 12% of perfunctory answer. Implementation of the test purposes in this school to measure student’s learning physics achievement. The research goal is to compare the equality between descriptions test and ranking test as instrument test into measure student’s achievement of learning physics. Descriptive research worked as the research design with Single Group Design and equalization design used Single Group Design. Population of study is students at 10th grade of SMK Bandung, whereas the sample is 54 students at tenth grade. Determinate this sample used purposivesampling technique. In the implementation, descriptive test and ranking task to be formative test concurrently. The result of the research to showed the second variance value test 0,06 lower than table variance value, in this case to showed ranking task equivalent to descriptive test in measuring students’ achievement of learning physics. Thereby ranking task can be used as instrument test to measure students’ achievement of learning physics.
Keywords
descriptive test; ranking task; achievement of learning
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi 2). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Bloom, B. S.ed.et.al. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain. New York. David McKay.
Carracio, C. dan Englander, R. (2004). Understanding Competency-based Education. London: Routlegde Inc.
Hudgins, D.W. (2005). Investigation of The Effect of Rangking Task On Students Understanding of key Astronomi Topic. University of South Africa.
O’Kuma, Thomas.L, David P.Maloney dan Curtis J. Hieggelke.(2000). Rangking Task Exercise in Physics. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.
Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 20 Tahun 2007 Tanggal 11 Juni 2007 Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.
Lampiran Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Mahmud, D. (1989). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Prestasi Belajar Siswa. [online], tersedia di: http://mahera.net/2011/01/arti-pengertian-definisi-prestasi-belajar/ (2 Februari 2012)
Sukirno. (2007). Penyetaraan Tes UAN: Mengapa dan Bagaimana?. Cakrawala Pendidikan (XXVI) No. 3. 305-321. [online]. tersedia:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:I60h1pDNoYgJ:isjd.pdii.lipi.go.id/admin/jurnal/26307305321.pdf+penyetaraan+tes&hl=id&gl=id&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESi_NB3SsWQktX7BcZ6eyPvt0caaiQqX5kp85HW5kKjIRyhYnLRu03S556QAunBxTfuwnsPPbSrhQaok5iCEEN5si3IxvMxDoTapsmXa2zRH1ZAQEJFdtk3pwhBaUviW5yi0PckB&sig=AHIEtbRN5Ieb6BIyDuADE6pcALupzqFu9w. [30 Maret 2012]