DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTIVE DESIGN THROUGH COLLABORATION LEARNING STRATEGIES CAN TO IMPROVE QUALITY ON THE COLLEGE OF SERIES PUBLISHING MANAGEMENT

Sokhibul Ansor, Inawati Inawati

Abstract


The emergence of a new paradigm is expected to contribute to overcoming the problem of learning, namely students will increase the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of people who learn. For students to experience changes in learning, a teacher, lecturer, and instructor are seen as needing to develop a constructivist-based learning design. The aim of developing constructivist learning designs through collaborative learning is to produce learning designs in the course management series publications. With this learning design, it is expected. (1) Students actively construct or build their knowledge; (2) Students are free in learning and doing collaborative activities in learning, (3) Provides opportunities for students to use diverse learning resources, (4) Students are encouraged to solve problems in learning. The learning strategy used in the management course for serial publications is collaborative learning. The research method used in the development to produce this design product is the R2D2 model. The results show that the collaborative learning strategy was tested on the subject matter of making a catalog of serial publications which shows that 5 respondent groups declared to be very feasible do not need to be revised in making software programs for serial publications of catalogs; 5 groups of respondents declared eligible do not need to be revised


Keywords


Constructivis; Collaboration; Development; Learning Design; Management; Serial Publication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adnan, Abimanyu, S., Bundu, P., & Arsyad, N. (2014). Enhance cognitive learning of junior high-school students through the implementation of Constructivist Models of Learning Biology-Based ICT (ICT-Based MPBK). International Journal Of Academic Research, 6(5), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2014

Branch, R. M., & Dousay, T. A. (2015). Survey of instructional design models (5th ed.; D. R. Walling, Ed.).

Retrieved from https://aect.org/survey_of_instructional_design.php

Degen, I. N. S. (1998). Mencari paradigma baru pemecahan masalah belajar dari keteraturan menuju kesemrawutan. Makalah Disajikan Dalam Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar IKIP Malang.

Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.

Hendriansyah, Marzuki, & Suratman, D. (2019). Pengembangan desain pembelajaran matematika melalui pendekatan konstruktivistik di Sekolah Menengah Atas Pertama Negeri 2 Segedong. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Jonassen, D. H. (2006). A constructivist’s perspective on functional contextualism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-6493-3

Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17-27.

Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., & Pratt, J. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design on JSTOR. Retrieved October 28, 2020, from Educational Technology Publications.

Mustaji. (2010). Pengembangan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah dengan pola belajar kolaborasi (Model PBMPK). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran (JPP), 17(2), 187–200.

Reigeluth, C. (1997). Instructional theory, practitioner needs, and new directions: some reflections. Educational Technology, 37(1), 42–47.

Reiser, R. A. (1994). Examining the planning practices of teachers: Reflections on three years of research. Educational Technology, 34(3), 11–16.

Richey, - Rita C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.

Setyosari, P. (2009). Pembelajaran kolaborasi: Landasan untuk mengembangkan keterampilan sosial, rasa saling menghargai dan tanggung jawab. Malang:UM

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning : Teori, riset dan praktik. Bandung : Nusa Media.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Willis, J. W. (Ed.). (2008). Constructivist instructional design (CID): Foundations, models, and examples. New York: IAP – Information Age Publishing.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/edulib.v10i2.24756

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.17509/edulib.v10i2.24756.g20116

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Edulib

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.