The Evaluation of Senior High School Geography Curriculum using Countenance’s Model and A Responsive Approach

Peni Saptorini, Abd. Rahman A. Ghani, Maman Abdul Majid Binfas

Abstract


This study aims to evaluate the Geography curriculum for senior high school using Countenance’s model and responsive approach. This study is qualitative research and it used the interview and document study for data collecting. The interview was done by interviewing 15 Geography teachers of senior high school in the West Java Province. The interview also has been done by interviewing the leader of Association of Indonesian Geography and the Coordinator of Facilitation and Curriculum Evaluation from the Center of Curriculum of Ministry of Education and Culture. Document study has been done by studying the document of 2018 Revision from 2013 Curriculum. The data of the research has been analyzed using interactive analysis from Miles and Huberman. The results shows: (1) 75% interviewees said that the design of Geography curriculum should be reviewed; (2) 87% interviewees said that having Geography in the specialization social subject is less precise;(3)  63% interviewees said that distribution of basic competency and material of Geography for class X-XII should be reorganized;(4) Need improvement in Geography learning, so it would encourage critical and analytical thinking, also the student’s geocapabilities. The recommendations are: (1) The team of curriculum development should consider the suggestions  about the change of Geography curriculum; (2) MGMP Geography in the regencies or provinces should arrange any programs to increase the competencies of Geography teachers which is collaborated with the other stakeholders; (3) Formulating the draft of new curriculum should consider any suggestions so Geography would be given the realistic contribution in lives.


Keywords


curriculum evaluation; Geography for Senior High School; countenance’s model; responsive approach

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto and Jabar. (2009). Evaluation of Educational Programs, Practical Theoretical Guidelines for Students and Educational Practitioners. Earth Literacy: Jakarta

Asymanidar, Dede Rohmat, and Mamat Ruhimat. (2013). Development of Character Education-Based Geography Learning Tools. Gea Journal of Geography Education 13 (1) April 2013: 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v13i1.3302.g2288

Indonesian Geospatial Information Agency and Geographical Association. (2015). Geomaritim Paradigm: Strategy to Make Indonesia Become a World Maritime Axis in a Geographical Perspective. BIG: Jakarta.

Hasan, S. Hamid. (2014). Curriculum Evaluation. Postgraduate School of the Indonesian University of Education in collaboration with Youth Rosdakarya: Bandung.

Khuluqo, Chairunnisa, and Ghani. (2020). Teacher's Perception of Curriculum Changes in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29 (6) 2020: 4690-4693. ISSN: 2005-4238 IJAST.

Miles and Huberman. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. Cet. 1. Translated by Rohidi. UI Press: Jakarta.

Moleong, Lexy J. (2017). Qualitative Research Methodology. Youth Rosdakarya: Bandung.

Permendikbud Number 36 of 2018 concerning Amendments to Permendikbud Number 59 of 2014 concerning Curriculum 2013. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2018 Number 1691.

Permendikbud Number 37 of 2018 concerning Amendments to Permendikbud Number 24 of 2016 concerning Core Competencies and Basic Competencies of Lessons in the 2013 Curriculum in Primary and Secondary Education. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2018 Number 1692.

Setyawan, Agnaz. (2019). Overview of Curriculum Geography in Developed Countries. agnazgeograph.files.wordpress.com, accessed July 1, 2019.

Sugandi, Dede. (2015). Learning Geography as One of the Basis for National Character Formation. Journal of Socio Humanika Vol. 8 (2) November 2015: 241-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2121/sosiohumanika.v8i2.608.

Sutomo. (2013). Geography Learning Competencies in Cultivating Students' Geo-Spatial Concepts for Character Building. Journal of Geoeducation 2 (1) March 2013: 39-43. ISSN: 2085-2436

Winarni, Endang Widi. (2018). Theory and Practice of Qualitative Quantitative Research, Classroom Action Research (PTK) Research and Development (R&D). Earth Literacy: Jakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v21i1.31634

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v21i1.31634.g14625

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Peni Saptorini, Abd. Rahman A. Ghani, Maman Abdul Majid Binfas

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.