Argumentation and Reasoning Skills In Socioscientific Issues

A. L. Alindra, Ana Ana


Education is facing big challenges so that it can create qualify individuals in problem solving. Application of knowledge and or scientific concepts in the public is a realization of knowledge obtained by students at school. There are several ways to develop science education, one of which is through argumentation skill towards socioscientific issues. The socioscientific issue is scientific concept and problem-based issue, controversy, public discussion greatly influenced by socio-politics. This writing by literature study method aims to explore on argumentation skill for students so that they can face any problem solving challenges in daily life by studying; application of argumentation skill for socio scientific issue in daily life, argumentation and reasoning as well as Toulmin Argumentation Patter as the pattern used in student argumentation skill access.


Socioscientific Issue, Toulmin Argumentation Pattern

Full Text:



Acar, O., Turkmen, L., & Roychoudhury, A. (2010). Student difficulties in socio-scientific argumentation and decision-making research findings: Crossing the borders of two research lines. International Journal of Science Education. 32(9), 1191-1206.

Anderson, C. (2012). On the nature of thought processes and their relationship to the accumulation of knowledge: The process of making a diagnosis. Dermatology Practical and Conceptual, 2(4), 47-62.

Barnet, S., & Bedau, H. (2011). Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing-A Brief Guide to Argument. (K. S. Henry, Ed.) (7th ed.). Boston: One World.

Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., a, Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612.

Bulgren, J. A., Ellis, J. D., & Marquis, J. G. (2014). The Use and Effectiveness of an Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 82–97.

Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., & Kutluca, A. Y. (2014). The Quality of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation: Influence of Content Knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 1–23.

Dawson, V. & Venville, G.J. (2009) High‐school Students’ Informal Reasoning and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy?. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421-1445.

Ding, L. (2014). Verification of Causal Influences of Reasoning Skill and Epistemology on Physics Conceptual Learning. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1-5. accessed 2 November 2018. The American Physical Society. Online:

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of socioscientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287- 312.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). Tapping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.

Hasnunidah, N. & Susilo, H. (2014). Profile of Sociocultural Perspective of Students in Arguing in Basic Biology Courses. Proceeding Biology Education Conference. XI National Seminar on Biology Education FKIP UNS.

Herlanti, Y., N. Y. Rustaman, I. Rohman, A. Fitriani. (2012). Argumentation Quality in Discussion on Microbiological Socioscientific Issues through Weblogs. Indonesian Science Education Journal, 1(2), 168-177.

Hitchcock, D. (2005). Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model, Argumentation, 2005 (19) 373–391.

Kuhn, D. (1991). “The skills of argument”. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Kusnandar, A. (2008). ICT for Learning. Module. Jakarta: Pustekom Depdiknas.

Lemke, J. (1990). Talking Science, Language, Learning and Values. New York: Ablex.

Marttunen, M. (1994). Assessing Argumentation Skills among Finnish University Students. Learning and Instruction, 4(94): 175-191.

Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informed reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139–178.

Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57-74. doi:

Nurhayati, N. L., Yuliati, N., Mufti. (2016) Scientific Reasoning Pattern and Physical Synthetic Problem Solving Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(8):1594-1597.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.

PISA. (2013). PISA 2012 Result: Creative Problem Solving Students Skills in Tackling Real-Life Problems (5). OECD.

Rogoff, B. (1993). Observing Sociocultural Activity on Three Planes. In Wertsch, J. V., del Río, P., and Alvarez, A. (Eds), In Sociocultural Studies of Mind (pp 139-163). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488.

Sadler, T. D., & Donelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effect of content knowledge and morality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.

Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90(1), 986-1004.

Sampson, V., & Clark, D.B., (2008). Assesment of the ways studentd generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447-472. doi:

Toulmin, S. E. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning, 2nd edition, Macmillan, New York.

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument (Updated edition 2003). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Venville, G.J & Dawson, V.M. (2010). The Impact of classroom intervention on grade 1 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (8), 952-977.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society, The Developmental of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Innovation of Vocational Technology Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

View My Stats