Student Response - Based Learning: A Strategy for Improving Student Participation in Learning

Karpin Karpin, Ai Mahmudatussa’adah


In the context of 21st century learning, to achieve meaningful learning processes, one of the important elements is interaction. Student response - based learning can be used to actively involve students in the learning process. The study focused on stages of the learning process based on student responses and student responses to the learning. Formulation of the research problem is following: (1) how are the stages of the learning process based on student responses to increasing student participation in learning ?; (2) how is the student response to student response based learning? The research objectives are: (1) increasing the active participation of students in learning through conditioning the learning environment; and (2) describing the steps of the student response-based learning process. The research conducted is a research development. Conclusion of the results of the study: first, the stages of the student response-based learning process (learning model syntax) are (a) uploading teaching materials; (b) Question & Individual Vote; (c) Peer Discussion; (d) Second Vote; (e) Whole-class Discussion. These learning steps can increase student participation in learning. Second, students generally give positive responses to student response based learning. A positive response is given to the factor of the variable (a) explanation; (b) facilitation; (c) value; (d) positivity; (e) distraction; and (f) participation.


student response based learning

Full Text:



Balakrishnan, V., and Lay, G. C. (2013). Mobile wireless technology and its use in lecture room environment: An observation in Malaysian Institutes of higher learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(6), 634.

Beetham, H., and Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. Oxon: Routledge.

Beltran, J. C. (2018). Examining the effects of the Application of a Student Response System in teaching Media and Information Literacy to Senior High School Students. Philippines: Ateneo De Manila University.

Boyle, J. T., and Nicol, D. J. (2003). Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 3(11), 43-57.

Brenner, T. (2015). The use of Mobile Devices in the College Classroom. Harvard University: The Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. [Online]. Retrieved from: [Accessed on: November 20, 2017].

Caceffo, R., and Azevedo, R. (2014). LSQuiz: A Collaborative Classroom Response System to Support Active Learning through Ubiquitous Computing. Presented at International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA) 2014. [Online]. Retrieved from: [Accessed on: November 24, 2019].

Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20.

Carnegie Mellon University. (2007). A teaching with technology white paper: Classroom response system. [Online]. Retrieved from: [Accessed on: August 15, 2016].

Crouch, A. H., and Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.

Hedgcock, W. H., and Rouwenhorst, R. M. (2014). Clicking their way to success: using student response systems as a tool for feedback. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 22(2), 16-25.

Kay, R. H., and LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819-827.

Keough, S. M. (2012). Clickers in the Classroom: A Review and a Replication. Journal of Management Education, 36(6), 822-847.

Lander, B., and Stoeckel, S. (2012). Tips & trends: Classroom response systems. [Online]. Retrieved from: winter.pdf [Accessed on: August 15, 2016].

Mahon, K. (2012). Using student response systems to improve student outcomes. THE Journal White Papers, 27, 1-13.

Martyn, M. (2007). Clickers in the classroom: An active learning approach. Educause Quarterly, 30(2), 71–74.

Nielsen, K. L., Hansen, G., and Stav, J. B. (2013). Teaching with student response systems (SRS): lecturer-centric aspects that can negatively affect students’ experience of using SRS. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-13.

Rao, S. P., and DiCarlo, S. E. (2000). Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes. Advances in Physiology Education, 24, 51-55.

Rice, R. E., and Bunz, U. (2006). Evaluating a wireless course feedback system: the role of demographics, expertise, fluency, competence, and usage. Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education, 6(3), 1-32.

Skinner, E. A., and Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). Boston, MA: Springer.

Traxler, J. (2010). Students and mobile devices. Alt-j, 18(2), 149-160.

Turning Technologies. (2010). Turning technologies solutions learning theories supported. [Online]. Retrieved from: [Accessed on: August 15, 2016].



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Innovation of Vocational Technology Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

View My Stats