Evaluasi Pemenuhan Standar Minimal Sarana dan Prasarana Pendidikan Dasar di Kota Bandung

Tjahyani Busono

Abstract


This research was aimed to describe the condition of infrastructure facilitiesof basic education based on the standard of school facilities and infrastructure/public madrasah (Permendiknas no. 24 2007). The results illustrate that the vast majority of school buildingsare in accordance with the standards established. Classrooms a splaces of teaching and learning in most primary schools have been very adequate. Only still found some schools that do not have the staff room, principal room, UKS space, prayer room, and werehouse representative in order to support teaching and learning activities. But still there are schools that less attention and support facilities not regularly carry out maintenance of the building. For schools that are in the main street, still unable to overcome the noise caused by traffic so that it can interfere with teaching and learning activities. The existence of the school adjacent to the crowd as the market also require attention to reduce the disruption of teaching and learning activities.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S . (1988). Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: P2LPTK.

Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (2003).Educational Research an Introduction.Seventh Edition. New York: Longman.

Creswel, Jhon W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Aproach. London: Sage Publication.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta, Biro Hukum dan Organisasi Depdiknas.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Sarana dan Prasarana Untuk Sekolah Dasar/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (SD/MI), Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (SMP/MTS), dan Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah (SMA/MA). Jakarta, Biro Hukum dan Organisasi Depdiknas.

Goodban & Hayslett. (1979). Gambar Dan Perencanaan Arsitektur, Edisi 3. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Joni, TR (1980). Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: P2LPTK.

Mangunwijaya, Y.B. (1981). Pasal-Pasal Penghantar Fisika Bangunan. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Muhibbin, Syah. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Neufert , E. (1996). Data Arsitektur, Edisi 33, Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Satwiko,P. (2004). Fisika Bangunan 1. Jogjakarta: Andi.

Singarimbun dan Efendi. (1995). Penelitian Survei. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Sudjana, N. (1989). Metode Kegiatan Partisifatif. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sudjana, N. dan Rivai, A. (2001). Teknologi Pengajaran. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Supriyadi, D. et al. (1996). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: FIP IKIP Bandung.

Syamsuddin, A. (2007). Psikologi Kependidikan: Perangkat Sistem Pengajaran Modul. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Usman, U. (2002). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v7i1.6079

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Innovation of Vocational Technology Education



This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

View My Stats