Determining priority criteria for using online learning media in Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method

Hilman Permana, Erik Haritman

Abstract


Many institutions in Indonesia swiftly shifted their educational programs to online learning with minimal preparation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This has resulted in a situation termed as Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT), defined as a temporary and abrupt shift from offline (face-to-face) to online (virtual) instructional delivery as a consequence of a disaster. It is crucial for educators to grasp key aspects of utilizing online learning media. This research aims to identify recommended criteria and alternatives for the use of online learning media from the educators’ perspective, employing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, which is suitable for ranking issues. This method involves a group decision-making process that employs comprehensive and multidimensional ranking in various domains. The research instrument comprises a questionnaire filled out by educators, including lecturers and teachers, totaling 13 respondents. The study reveals that the top-ranked criteria and alternative for the use of online learning media are the ease of operation criterion (K1) and the fastness alternative (A1). Future research is encouraged to further explore the application of the AHP method in other aspects of online learning

Keywords


Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT); online learning media; Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dao Thi Thu, H., & Duong Hong, N. (2021, July). A Survey on Students’ Satisfaction with Synchronous E-learning at Public Universities in Vietnam during the COVID-19. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 196-202).

UNESCO, U. (2020). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. UNESCO.

Kristanto, Y. D., Utomo, B., & Sulistyani, N. (2020). Listening to the student voice on emergency remote teaching during the pandemic crisis. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (Vol. 5, pp. 7-13).

Saputra, E. R., & Rusmana, N. (2021, July). Students’ experience of online game-based assessment tool during emergency remote teaching. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1987, No. 1, p. 012012). IOP Publishing.

Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning.

Yildirim, K. (2020). Lessons from an exceptional distance education experience. Alanyazin, 1(1), 7-15.

Aswir, S. H. M., & Rosiana, D. F. (2021). Google Meet Application as an Online Learning Media for Descriptive Text Material. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, Vol. 4, No. 1, 189-193. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.4.1.2021.533

Pratama, H., Azman, M. N. A., Kassymova, G. K., & Duisenbayeva, S. S. (2020). The Trend in using online meeting applications for learning during the period of pandemic COVID-19: A literature review. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(2), 58-68.

Dalalah, D., Al-Oqla, F., & Hayajneh, M. (2010). Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of cranes. Jordan Journal of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, 4(5).

Cabała, P. (2010). Using the analytic hierarchy process in evaluating decision alternatives. Operations research and decisions, 20(1), 5-23.

Aziz, N. F., Sorooshian, S., & Mahmud, F. (2016). MCDM-AHP method in decision makings. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(11), 7217-7220.

Pant, S., Kumar, A., Ram, M., Klochkov, Y., & Sharma, H. K. (2022). Consistency indices in analytic hierarchy process: a review. Mathematics, 10(8), 1206.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98.

Cho, Y. Y., & Woo, H. (2022). Factors in evaluating online learning in higher education in the era of a new normal derived from an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based survey in South Korea. Sustainability, 14(5), 3066.

Mu, E., Florek-Paszkowska, A., & Pereyra-Rojas, M. (2022). Development of a Framework to Assess Challenges to Virtual Education in an Emergency Remote Teaching Environment: A Developing Country Student Perspective—The Case of Peru. Education Sciences, 12(10), 704.

Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26.

Wang, S., Liu, Y., Song, F., Xie, X., & Yu, D. (2021). Research on evaluation system of user experience with online live course platform. Ieee access, 9, 23863-23875.

Saaty, T. L. (2001). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process (Vol. 6). RWS publications.

Ertmer, P. A., Sadaf, A., & Ertmer, D. J. (2011). Student-content interactions in online courses: The role of question prompts in facilitating higher-level engagement with course content. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23, 157-186.

Wang, C. S., & Lin, S. L. (2019). How instructors evaluate an e-learning system? An evaluation model combining fuzzy AHP with association rule mining. Journal of Internet Technology, 20(6), 1947-1959.

Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v20i1.67952

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 INVOTEC

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

View My Stats