Bridging Theory and Practice: Teachers’ Challenges in Making Stage of Design Process
Abstract
This study investigated the challenges Grade 9 Technology teachers face in facilitating the making phase of mini-Practical Assessment Tasks (mini-PATs), a central component of the Senior Phase Technology curriculum. Although the design process underpins Technology Education, limited research has examined how teachers guide learners in translating theoretical designs into physical artefacts. This gap has left uncertainties regarding the pedagogical and contextual barriers that constrain effective facilitation of hands-on learning. Guided by the constructivist paradigm and the 9E instructional model, the study explored how teachers support learners in applying prior knowledge during the Investigation, Design, Making, Evaluation, and Communication (IDMEC) cycle. A qualitative case study design involved ten purposively selected Technology teachers, with semi-structured interviews and non-participant classroom observations. Data were audio-recorded and thematically analysed, with verbatim excerpts illustrating key findings. Results revealed persistent challenges, including inadequate resources, limited facilities, and low teacher confidence in managing practical tasks. Many teachers struggled to link learners’ prior knowledge to hands-on activities, resulting in superficial engagement and restricted skill development. The study contributes to Technology Education by illuminating the under-explored complexities of facilitating the making phase and provides evidence-based recommendations, including targeted professional development, improved resources, and strategies to integrate theory and practice to enhance teacher competence and learners’ problem-solving skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051.
Alem, D.D. (2020). An Overview of Data Analysis and Interpretations in research. International Journal of Academic Research in Education and Review, 8(1),1-27.
Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.
Blose, P., & Ndlovu, E. C. (2023). An investigation on factors affecting the teaching of practical assessment tasks in the senior phase technology classrooms. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(4), 345-359.
Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement: Grades 7–9 Technology. Department of Basic Education.
Gómez, P. S. M., van Eijck, M., & Jochems, W. (2013). Facilitating the learning process in design-based learning practices: An investigation of teachers’ actions in supervising students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(3), 288- 307
Goredema, R., Masina, R. & Chinengundu, T. (2024). Integrating educational technology in the delivery of design-based courses at a technical teachers' college in Zimbabwe. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 20:(2),109-120.
Grant, P.D., Longhurst, J.M. & Thier, M. (2024). Rural Definition Triangulation: Improving the Credibility and Transferability of Rural Education Research in the United States. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 40(1).
Kola, M.I. (2022). Using analytical rubrics to assess technological solutions in the technology classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3).
Kubheka, P. (2018). Strengthening the teaching of mini-practical assessment task in a senior phase technology class (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State).
Lim, W.M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal , 33(2) 199–229.
Maeko, M. The demise of technical subjects in South Africa: a perspective from university pre-service teachers. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 6(2).
Magolego, M, P., Mtshali, T.I. & Ramaligela, S. M. (2023). Enhanced creativity with Mini-PAT: A case of grade 9 Technology teachers in
Makwana, D., Engineer, P., Dabhi, M. & Chudasama, H. (2023). Sampling Methods in Research: A Review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 7(3), 762-768.
Mirza, H., Bellalem, F., & Mirza, C. (2023). Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research: Summary Guidelines forNovice Social Science Researchers. Social Studies and Research Journal, 11(1),441-449
Nkosi, P., & Mtshali, T. (2024). Enacting Creative Thinking Skills Using Design Process in Technology Classrooms. Futurity Education, 4(4), 123-136.
Nkwanyane, T.P., & Monyuku, N.V. (2025). Implementing cooperative learning in vocational technology education to enhance pre-service teachers’ design skills. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 21(1), 49-57.
Ramaboea, H.K., Ramaligela, S., & Mtshali, T. Grade 9 Technology Teachers' Ability to Facilitate Mini -Practical Assessment Tasks through 9E Instructional Model in Technology Classroom. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 7(12), 139-146.
Ramaligela, S. M., Ogbonnaya, U. I., & Mji, A. (2019). Comparing pre-service teachers’ PCK through 9E instructional practice: a case of mathematics and technology pre-service teachers. Africa Education Review, 16(3), 101-116.
Rauscher, W. 2016. A philosophical framework for enhancing the understanding of artefacts in the technology classroom. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), 214-224.
Schwichow, M., Christoph, S., Boone, W. J., & Härtig, H. (2016). The impact of sub-skills and item content on students’ skills with regard to the control-of-variables strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 216–237.
Sekhukhune East. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching & Learning, 7 (1).
Semin,J.T., Cabriga, F.P.,Polon, G.L.S & Alumno, M.M. (2024). Gender as Determinant in Performances in Areas of Technology and Livelihood Education. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 20(2), 83-98.
Sholihiin, A. M. (2020). Efl students ‘online classroom participation: a case study of advanced reading comprehension subject (doctoral dissertation, universitas Islam Nigeria).
Stake, R. E. 2010. Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press.
Stasovskyi, Y. (2024). Using creativity techniques to develop innovations. Economic Synergy, 4(14), 23-24.
Suchita, G, S., Devi, S., Pal, S., & Mahajan, R. (2023). Exploring effective strategies for integrating technology in teacher education. European Chemical Bulletin, 12, 746-755.
Szombatová, V. (2016). The semi-structured interview in foreign language education research. Proceeding of the the International Conference on Language and Literature in Education and Research. Prague, pp 416-431.
Ugwu, C.N., & Eze, V.H.U. (2023). Qualitative Research. IDOSR Journal of Computer and Applied Sciences, 8(1):20-35.
Warr, M., Mishra, P., & Scragg, B. (2020). Designing theory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 601-632.
Zahle, J. (2021). Objective data sets in qualitative research. Synthese, 199(1), 101-117.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v21i2.88020
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Hendrick Khurume Ramaboea, Mogale Simon Albert Maeko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.


