Cover Image

ARSITEKTUR MESJID SEBAGAI ADAPTASI DAN ORIENTASI RUANG DALAM BUDAYA SASAK, STUDI KASUS DESA KOPANG, LOMBOK TENGAH

Taufan Hidjaz

Abstract


Abstract: Lombok referred to as “The Island of Thousand Mosques”, but more than that, there are around 9000 mosques in 518 Lombok villages with became the center of residential orientation. The traditional residential pattern of Kopang Village in central Lombok, as other Sasak residence in general, formed by values that bind its poeple in a culturalspace with a social system of kinship which then forms a distinctive environmental pattern. Sasak cultural space structure was formed as it is based on a worldview which became a way of life. The way of life of Sasak people in Kopang village is a concrete form of cultural values which makes mosque architecture as the center of the residential orientation pattern. Each of the cluster pattern is a residence formed by a relationship of structured activities from the people with the mosque. Before becoming identical with Islam, the old Sasak community which called Sasak Lebung used natural objects such as mountains, springs, and large trees as a marker and center of mythic-dynamism cultural and space orientation. After becoming Islam, Sasak people adapt the concept of space and make the mosque as the center of mythic-religious cultural and space orientation. This research using qualitative analytical descriptive method with environmental culture-based approach by considering the artifacts of the mosque with te residential environment in relation to the Sasak cosmology. Mosque architecture becomes very dominant role to represent culture and its symbolic meaning in cultural space of Sasak.

 

Keywords : mosque, adaptive, orientation, Sasak culture, Kopang village.

 

Abstrak : Lombok disebut sebagai “Pulau seribu mesjid” padahal lebih dari itu, dari 518 desa terdapat didalamnya 9000 an mesjid yang menjadi pusat orientasi hunian. Pola hunian tradisional desa Kopang di Lombok Tengah sebagaimana umumnya hunian Sasak terbentuk oleh tata nilai yang mengikat masyarakatnya dalam suatu ruang budaya dengan sistem sosial kekerabatan  yang kemudian membentuk pola lingkungan khas.  Terbentuknya struktur ruang budaya Sasak karena dilandasi oleh cara pandang terhadap dunia yang menjadi semacam jalan kehidupan. Cara hidup masyarakat Sasak di desa Kopang adalah bentuk kongkrit  nilai-nilai budayanya yang menjadikan Arsitektur Mesjid pusat orientasi hunian sehingga membentuk pola hunian kantong yang khas.  Tiap pola kantong tersebut merupakan hunian yang terbentuk oleh  hubungan kegiatan terstruktur masyarakatnya dengan mesjid.  Sebelum menjadi identik dengan Islam, masyarakat Sasak lama disebut Sasak Lebung menggunakan objek alam seperti gunung, mata air dan pohon besar sebagai penanda dan pusat orientasi ruang budaya yang mitis-dinamisme. Setelah menjadi Islam masyarakat Sasak melakukan adaptasi konsep ruang dan menjadikan mesjid sebagai pusat orientasi ruang budaya yang mitis-religius. Penelitian ini secara umum menggunakan metode deskriptif-analitis-kualitatif berbasis pendekatan budaya lingkungan dengan mempertimbangkan artefak mesjid menjadi fokus penelitian sebagai fenomena budaya. Hasil penelitian ini menguraikan keterkaitan   mesjid dengan lingkungan ruang hunian dalam kaitannya dengan kosmologi Sasak. Arsitektur mesjid menjadi sangat dominan berperan merepresentasikan  budaya dan makna simboliknya di dalam ruang budaya masyarakat Sasak.

 

Kata kunci : mesjid, adaptasi, orientasi,budaya Sasak,desa Kopang.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony Antoniades (1990), Poetics of Architecture, Theory of Design, New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Allen, Anne E G (1993), “Architecture as Social Expression in Western Samoa: Acioms and Models”, Journal Traditional Dwelling and Settlements Review, Vol V Number I, 1993, Berkeley, University of California at Berkeley.

Corliss Lamont (1957), “The Philosophy of Humanism” New York, The Wisdom Library.

C A Van Peursen (1976), “Strategie Van De Cultuur” di terjemahkan oleh Dick Hartoko menjadi “ Strategi Kebudayaan”, Yayasan Kanisius, Yogyakarta..

Danby, Miles, “Privacy as a Culturally Related Factor in Built Form”, dalam Farmer, Ben dan Louw, Hentie (1993), “Companion to Contemporary Architectural Thought”, London, Routledge.

Edi Sedyawati (2007), “Keindonesiaan dalam Budaya”, Penerbit Wedatama Widya Sastra, Jakarta.

G. Coedes (1968), “The Indianized States of Southeast Asia”, diedit oleh Walter F Vella dan diterjemahkan oleh Susan Brown Cowing, Honolulu ; East-West Center Press.

Hardie, Graeme, Tswana (1985) “Concept of Placemaking”, dalam G Missinghamb and P. Downton, (eds), “Place and Placemaking”, Proceeding of People and Physical Environment Research (PAPER) Conference, Melbourne,.

Hoebel, E Adamson dan Frost, Everett L (1976), “Cultural and Social Anthropology”,New York, Mc Graw-Hill Book,

J.C. Maxwell, dikutip dari Ruang Dalam Arsitektur, oleh Cornelis van de Ven, Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Knowles, Ralph (1996), “Rhythm and Ritual,Maintaining the Identity of a Place”, dalam Journal Traditional Dwelling and Settlements”, Vol Ninety Four/IASTE 94-96, Berkeley, IASTE – University of California.

Levi-Strauss, Claude (1963), Structural Anthropology, New York, Basic Book.

Locher GW. (1978), Transformation and Tradition, and Other Essays, KITLV – Translation Series 18, The Hogue-Martinus Nijhoff,.

M.P.Cowen dan R.W. Shenton (1996), Doctrines of Development, London : Routledge.

Norberg-Schulz, Christian (1979), “Genius Loci”, New York, Electa/Rizolly.

Norget, Kristin (2000), “Ritual” dalam Raymond Scupin, ed, Religion and Culture, An Anthropological Focus, New Jersey, Prenctice Hall,

Putra, Nengah dkk (1985), “Kesadaran Budaya Tentang Ruang pada Masyarakat, di Daerah NTB (Suatu Studi Menganai Proses Adaptasi)”, Proyek Inventarisasi dan Dokumentasi Kebudayaan Daerah, Prop NTB, Mataram, Depdikbud.

Rasmussen,D.M. (1971), Mythic-Symbolic Language and Philosophical Anthropology, A Constructive Interpretation of the thought of Paul Ricoeur, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague,.

Syahdan (2000), ” Code-Switching in the Speech of Elite Sasaks”, dalam Peter K Austin (ed), Sasak: Working Papers in Sasak, vol.2., Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, The University of Melbourne.

Sulasman, Setia Gumilar (2013), “ Teori-teori Kebudayaan, dari teori hingga aplikasi”, ISBN 978-979-076-369-2, Pustaka Seta, Bandung.

Tuan, Yi-Fu (1977), “Space and Place, The Perspective of Experience”, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

Taufan Hidjaz (2011), “ Interaksi Psiko-Sosial di Ruang Interior”, ISBN 978-602-98903-1-0, Jurusan Desain Interior, Institut Teknologi Nasional, Bandung,

Taufan Hidjaz (2018), “ Lombok, Negeri Beribu Mesjid”, ISBN 978-602-98903-5-8, Jurusan Desain Interior, Institut Teknologi Nasional, Bandung.

Waterson, Roxana (1990), “The Living House, An Anthropologgy of Architecture in South-East Asia”, Singapore, Kyodo Printing,

William Leiss (1972), “The Domination of Nature”, New York : George Braziller.

Wan Mohamad Noor Wan Daud (2011), “Pembangunan di Malaysia, Kearah Satu Kefahaman Baru yang Lebih Sempurna”, ISTAC.

Wan Mohamad Nor Wan Daud (2014) “Jurnal Pemikiran Islam”, Center for Advanced Studies on Islam, Science and Civilization, University Teknologi Malaysia.

Yaningsih, Sri (1981), “Sistem Kesatuan Hidup Setempat Daerah NTB”, Mataram, Depdikbud.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jaz.v1i1.11737

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Arsitektur ZONASI

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.