Development and Evaluation of an IoT-Based System for Near-Real-Time Average Heart Rate Monitoring in Team Sports
Abstract
Continuous and objective real-time internal load monitoring is essential in team sports but practically challenging to implement simultaneously for multiple athletes. This study aimed to develop and evaluate Mohan Pulsehub, an Internet of Things (IoT)-based real-time physiological monitoring system for multi-athlete average heart rate (HR) tracking. Employing a Research and Development (R&D) design, the system integrated Polar H10 sensors, wireless communication networks, and a centralized dashboard. Testing involved fourteen provincial-level male kabaddi athletes during a 2 x 20-minute match simulation scenario. Data aggregation was managed simultaneously by a central Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) gateway receiver. System validation assessed data transmission performance through latency and packet loss. Concurrent validity against a commercial benchmark utilized the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), while practical usability employed the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results indicated that the system successfully connected all fourteen sensors with a 99.72% transmission success rate, demonstrating an average latency of 186.4 ms and 0.28% packet loss. Data agreement was near-perfect (ICC = 0.998, MAE = 0.45 bpm). Furthermore, a preliminary usability evaluation by three end-users (a head coach, an assistant coach, and a performance analyst) yielded a mean SUS score of 84.3 ± 5.6 (individual scores: 78.8, 84.7, and 89.4, calculated using standard SUS item weighting). Conclusively, while independent physiological validity remains to be established, the study demonstrates that the developed IoT architecture provides robust data transmission integrity and near-perfect software agreement for Polar H10 data, serving as a reliable and user-friendly tool, supporting the feasibility of simultaneous near-real-time internal load monitoring in team sports.
Keywords
References
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction (5th ed.). Longman.
de Beukelaar, T. T., & Mantini, D. (2023). Monitoring resistance training in real time with wearable technology: current applications and future directions. Bioengineering, 10(9), 1085.
Latino, F., & Tafuri, F. (2024). Wearable sensors and the evaluation of physiological performance in elite field hockey players. Sports, 12(5), 124.
Mateus, N., Abade, E., Coutinho, D., Gómez, M. Á., Peñas, C. L., & Sampaio, J. (2024). Empowering the sports scientist with artificial intelligence in training, performance, and health management. Sensors, 25(1), 139.
Migliaccio, G. M., Padulo, J., & Russo, L. (2024). The impact of wearable technologies on marginal gains in sports performance: An integrative overview on advances in sports, exercise, and health. Applied Sciences, 14(15), 6649.
O’Grady, B., Lambe, R., Baldwin, M., Acheson, T., & Doherty, C. (2024). The validity of apple watch series 9 and ultra 2 for serial measurements of heart rate variability and resting heart rate. Sensors, 24(19), 6220.
Olsen, R. J., Hasan, S. S., Woo, J. J., Nawabi, D. H., & Ramkumar, P. N. (2025). The fundamentals and applications of wearable sensor devices in sports medicine: a scoping review. Arthroscopy, 41(2), 473-492.
Protzen, G., Riesco-Villar, J., González-Fernández, A., Escribano-Pascual, A., & Boullosa, D. (2025). Limited Validity of the Low-Cost Coospo H808S Heart-Rate Monitor Compared to the Polar H10. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 20(9), 1300-1305.
Sang, S. (2025). Evaluating team sport performance: a review of inertial sensor technologies and their applications. Sensor Review, 1-20.
Schaffarczyk, M., Rogers, B., Reer, R., & Gronwald, T. (2022). Validity of the polar H10 sensor for heart rate variability analysis during resting state and incremental exercise in recreational men and women. Sensors, 22(17), 6536.
Schumann, M., Feuerbacher, J. F., Heinrich, L., Olvera-Rojas, M., Sclafani, A., Brønd, J. C., ... & Ortega, F. B. (2025). Using Free-Living Heart Rate Data as an Objective Method to Assess Physical Activity: A Scoping Review and Recommendations by the INTERLIVE-Network Targeting Consumer Wearables: M. Schumann et al. Sports Medicine, 55(2), 275-300.
Seshadri, D. R., Harlow, E. R., Thom, M. L., Emery, M. S., Phelan, D. M., Hsu, J. J., ... & Voos, J. E. (2023). Wearable technology in the sports medicine clinic to guide the return-to-play and performance protocols of athletes following a COVID-19 diagnosis. Digital health, 9, 20552076231177498.
Spetz, L., Rogestedt, J., Nilsson, R., Mattsson, C. M., & Larsen, F. J. (2025). Validating subjective ratings with wearable data for a nuanced understanding of load-recovery status in elite endurance athletes. Sports Medicine-Open, 11(1), 154.
Staunton, C. A., Edholm, P., Ide, B. N., Ditroilo, M., & Wundersitz, D. (2025). Playerload™ and accelerometer-based metrics: scientific evaluation and implications for athlete monitoring. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7, 1710693.
Su, B., Li, F., & Su, B. (2025). Wearable sensors for precise exercise monitoring and analysis. Biosensors, 15(11), 734.
Teixeira, J. E., Afonso, P., Schneider, A., Branquinho, L., Maio, E., Ferraz, R., ... & Forte, P. (2025). Player tracking data and psychophysiological features associated with mental fatigue in U15, U17, and U19 male football players: a machine learning approach. Applied Sciences, 15(7), 3718.
Timmerman, W. P., Abbiss, C. R., Lawler, N. G., Stanley, M., & Raynor, A. J. (2024). Athlete monitoring perspectives of sports coaches and support staff: A scoping review. International journal of sports science & coaching, 19(4), 1813-1832.
Włoch, T., Kwiatkowski, M., Koziński, T., Donderska, M., Bochniak, P., Kołacz, J., ... & Szpaczyńska-Kwiatkowska, M. (2025). Application and effectiveness of modern technologies in sports training-a literature review. Quality in Sport, 42, 60523-60523.
Woolmer, E., Morris, R., Noon, M., Tallis, J., Clarke, N. D., & Eyre, E. (2025). What do athlete's really think? Athlete perceptions and attitudes towards athlete monitoring in professional soccer. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 20(4), 1478-1490.
Yang, K., McErlain-Naylor, S. A., Isaia, B., Callaway, A., & Beeby, S. (2024). E-textiles for sports and fitness sensing: current state, challenges, and future opportunities. Sensors, 24(4), 1058.
Zhu, J., Ye, Z., Liu, R., & Liu, J. (2025). Inertial measurement units (IMUs) for biomechanical analysis in sport: A review of applications, challenges and future directions. Sensor Review.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v11i2.105029
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Sendy Mohamad Anugrah, Tuliss Bial Fathannisa, Rian Triprayogo, Ida Zubaida, Danang Prama Dhani, Dadan Resmana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















