MODEL PRACTICE OF PEDAGOGICAL REASONING AND ACTION TEACHING IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOL PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHERS IN SELANGOR

Mohamed Faizul Mat Som

Abstract


This study aims to determine the extent of the practice using a survey method in questionnaires, with 580 samples taken from the teachers who teach physical education subjects. This study determines the degree of correspondence model of reasoning practice pedagogy, focusing on dimensions of understanding, transformation and teaching as eksogen variable. While on the other hand dimension of evaluation, reflection and understanding a new is practice action teaching teachers as endogen variable. This study uses the Structural Equation Modeling analysis method (SEM), where the findings explain the testing Goodness of Fit Chi Square with degrees of freedom which is 53, CMIN/DF 111.298 is 2.100 (<5), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) ialah .993 (> . 90), Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) is 989. (>. 90. While the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) value at .044 (<0.05). The measurement of the model this study proves that is able to match with the data model of a good review. The findings of the study significant the practice impresses determination between pedagogical reasoning and the act of teaching physical education among teachers in the model equation structure. This correlates with the actual teaching phenomenon that is happening in the secondary school in Selangor.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akta Pendidikan 1996 (Akta 550) & peraturan-peraturan terpilih hingga 20 hb. Julai 2006. Kuala Lumpur. ILBS.

Bailey, R., Macfadyen, T. (2000). Teaching physical education 5-11. London: Continuum.

Ball, D.L., & MacDiarmid, G. (1990). The subject matter preparation of teachers.Dalam W. Houston., M. Huberman., & J. Sikula. (Eds.) Handbook of reasearch on Teacher Education, hlm. 437-449, New York: MacMillan.

Brown, T.A (2006). Comfirmatory factor anlysis for applied research. New York: The Giuford Press.

Carmen Fernandez (2014). Knowledge base for teaching and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Some useful models and implications for teachers’ training.

Cuban, L. (1992).Curriculum stability and change.

Darst, P.W., & Pangrazi, R.P. (2006). Dynamic physical education for secondary school student (5th ed.). Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.

Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M.B. (1990). Making subject matter part of the conversation in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), hlm. 32-43.

Fullan, M., & Mascall, B. (2000). Human resourse issues in education: A literature review, Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.

Gallahue, D. L. (1996). Developmental physical education for today’s children (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IL: Brown & Benchmark.

Gallahue, D.L. (1996). Develeopmental physical education for today's children. Boston: McGraw Hill.

Hu, L; & Bentler, P.M; (1999). Cutoff of criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternative. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1-55.

Jacobsen, D.A., Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2002). Methods for teaching. Promoting students learning. 6th edition. Ohio: Merill Prentice Ha

Johnson, R., B., & Christensen, L. B. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Julismah Jani (2006). Teras pengetahuan mengajar guru mata pelajaran pendidikan jasmani di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Batang Padang, Perak. Jabatan Sains Sukan, Fakulti Sains Kognitif dan Pembangunan Manusia. UPSI.

Kauchak, D.P., & Eggen, P.D (2003). Learning and teaching. Research-based methods. Fourth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (1999). Surat pekeliling ikhtisas bil. 3/1999: Pendidikan jasmani. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Sekolah.

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2007). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan 2006- 2010. Putrajaya: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Kepimpinan dan pengurusan kurikulum di sekolah. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kuala Lumpur

Lumpkin, A. (2002). Introduction to physical education, exercise science, and sport studies (5th ed.). USA: McGraw-Hill.

Lutan, Rusli. (2001). Asas-asas pendidikan jasmani. Pendekatan pendidikan gerak di sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Direktokrat Jeneral Olahraga, Depdiknas.

MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-9

Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani, Faisol Elham, Zulkifli Awang, & Shahril@Charil Marzuki (2014). Pengajaran mata pelajaran pendidikan jasmani di sekolah menengah kawasan bandar dan luar bandar: Perspektif murid. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya, 1(3): 54-74.

Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani, Norfariza Mohd Radzi, Simin Ghavifekr, Husaina Banu Kenayatullah dan Mokhtar Muhamad (2014). Pengurusan disiplin murid di sekolah kawasan bandar dan luar bandar: Perspektif pemimpin sekolah. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya, 1(1): 7-40.

Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Bil. 5/2015. Kementerian pendidikan Malaysia.

Rink, J., Hall, T., dan Williams, L. (2010). Schoolwide physical activity - A comprehensive guide to designing and conducting programs. IL, USA: Human Kinetics Publisher Inc.

Rosnah Ali & Zaharah Hussin (2011). Kualiti guru pendidikan islam dalam ilmu pengetahuan isi kandungan mata pelajaran pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan (Edisi Khas), 2011, Universiti Malaya: Kuala Lumpur.

Schmidt et.al, (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual meeting of the American educational research association. April 13-17, San Diego, California.

Schmidt, W.H., Jorde, D., Cogan,L.S., Barrier,E., Gonzalo,I.,Schimizu, K.,Sawasa,T., Valverde,G.A., McKinght, C., Prawat, R.S., Wiley,D., Raizen,S.A., Britton,E.D., Wolfe, R.G. (1996). Characterizing pedagogical flow. An investigation of mathematics and science teaching in six countries. The Netherlands Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 15(2), 4 – 14.

Shulman, L.S (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Education Researcher, 15(2), hlm. 4-14.

Shulman, L.S (1992). Ways of seeing, ways of knowing, ways of teaching, ways of learning about teaching. Journal of Curriculum studies, 28, Sept-Oct. hlm. 393-396

Shulman, L.S, & Sparks, D. (1992). Merging content knowledge and pedagogy: An interview with Lee Shulman. Journal of staff Develpopment, 13(1), hlm. 14-16.

Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), hlm. 1-22

Shulman, L.S., & Grossman, P.L. (1988). The intern teacher case book. San Franscisco, CA: Far Wets Laboratory for Educational Research and Davelopment.

Syed Kamaruzaman Syed Ali & Shabeshan Rengasamy (2013). Strategi dan perancangan dalam pengajaran Pendidikan Jasmani di sekolah menengah dalam Amalan Pendidikan Jasmani di Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Pearson

Syed Kamaruzaman Syed Ali, Hazmaniran Harun, Farrawahida Mahmad Mddim & Habib Mat Som (2014). Pendidikan Jasmani dan Kesihatan Sekolah Menengah Di Malaysia: Halangan dan Cabaran Dalam Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS). Jurnal isu dalam pendidikan 2014. Universiti Malaya.

Syed Kamaruzzaman, Habib Mat Som & Muhamad Akhbar Zahidi (2016). Transformasi pendidikan jasmani: Satu anjakan pengajaran berkualiti: halaman 249 & 251 dalam transfomasi pendidikan nasional antara aspirasi dan anjakan.Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Tjeerdsma, B.L., & Metzler. M.W. (2000). Making decision for program improvement. Journal of teaching in Physical education. 19. 538-542




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/earr.v4i1.26198

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Educational Administration Research and Review

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Educational Administration Research and Review is issued by Educational Administration Program,
School of Post Graduate, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.