The effectiveness socialization of the Kurikulum Merdeka independently change in high schools Siak District

Wenny Fitria; Dadang Sukirman

doi:10.17509/jik.v20i1.53644

The effectiveness socialization of the Kurikulum Merdeka independently change in high schools Siak District

Wenny Fitria, Dadang Sukirman

Abstract

In the 2022/2023 school year, the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Research provides an opportunity for schools are not Sekolah Penggerak to implement the Kurikulum Merdeka independently. Government support for schools that implement the IKM independently change is provided primarily by the Platform Merdeka Mengajar (PMM). In PMM, all information about the Kurikulum Merdeka is available and can accessed by teachers and schools. Socialization of the Kurikulum Merdeka is no longer provided through training and education, but teachers and schools learn independently by accessing the platform. Although PMM is a breakthrough in the world of Indonesian education, the implementation at the education unit level still reaps the pros and cons. There are still many teachers in Indonesia who are unaware of this government program regarding PMM. By using a qualitative method, the author wants to know how the effectiveness of the socialization of the Kurikulum Merdeka through PMM in schools in Siak District that implement the Kurikulum Merdeka through independently change. The results showed that the use of PMM in these schools was not optimal, teachers preferred that the socialization be carried out face-to-face with a capabilities trainer.

Abstrak

Pada tahun ajaran 2022/2023 Kemendikbudristek memberi kesempatan kepada sekolah yang bukan Sekolah Penggerak untuk menerapkan Kurikulum Merdeka secara mandiri. Dukungan utama yang diberikan pemerintah kepada sekolah yang menerapkan IKM jalur mandiri adalah dengan menyediakan Platform Merdeka Mengajar (PMM). Di PMM tersedia semua informasi tentang Kurikulum Merdeka yang bisa diakses oleh guru dan sekolah. Sosialisasi mengenai Kurikulum Merdeka tidak lagi diberikan melalui diklat-diklat dan pelatihan berjenjang, melainkan guru dan sekolah belajar mandiri dengan mengakses platform tersebut. Walaupun PMM merupakan terobosan baru di dunia pendidikan Indonesia, tetapi penerapan dan penggunaannya di lapangan, masih menuai pro dan kontra. Masih banyak guru-guru di Indonesia yang belum mengetahui program pemerintah mengenai PMM ini. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif, penulis ingin mengetahui bagaimana efektivitas sosialisasi Kurikulum Merdeka melalui PMM di sekolah-sekolah di Kabupaten Siak yang menerapkan Kurikulum Merdeka melalui jalur mandiri berubah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan PMM di sekolah-sekolah tersebut belum maksimal, masih banyak guru yang tidak mengetahui keberadaan PMM tersebut, guru-guru lebih memilih sosialisasi dilakukan secara tatap muka dengan narasumber yang mempunyai kapabilitas di bidangnya.

Kata Kunci: Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka; Platform Merdeka Mengajar; Sosialisasi Kurikulum Merdeka

Keywords

Implementation of the Kurikulum Merdeka; Platform Merdeka Mengajar; Socialization of the Kurikulum Merdeka

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in Five Nations. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Anggraena, Y., Felicia, N., G, D. E., Pratiwi, I., Utama, B., Alhapip, L., & Widiaswati, D. (2021). Kajian akademik kurikulum untuk pemulihan pembelajaran. Pusat Kurikulum Dan Pembelajaran Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi.

Asmuni. (2020). Problematika pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi COVID-19 dan solusi pemecahannya. Jurnal Paedagogy: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan (7)4

Ball, S. J. (2005). Education policy and social class (1st ed.). Routledge.

Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How School Do Policy: policy Enacments in Secondary Schools.

Benavot, A., & Resh, N. (2003). Educational governance, school autonomy, and curriculum implementation: A comparative study of Arab and Jewish schools in Israel. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 171–196.

Bjork, C. (2005). Indonesian education teachers, schools, and central Bureaucracy. Taylor & Francis eBooks.

Bjork, C. (2016). High-stakes schooling : What we can learn from Japan’s experiences with testing, accountability, and education reform. The University of Chicago Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.

Cheung, A. C. K., & Wong, P. M. (2016). Factors affecting the implementation of curriculum reform in Hong Kong Key findings from a large-scale survey study Alan. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(1), 39–54.

Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264.

Hasan, S. H. (2004). Implementasi kurikulum dan guru. Inovasi Kurikulum, 1(1), 1–9.

Iswan. (2021). Manajemen pendidikan dan pelatihan (Vol. 4, Issue 1). Rajawali Pers.

Kemdikbudristek. (2021). Panduan pengembangan Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah (SD/MI, SMP/MTs, SMA/MA). Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–180.

Kemdikbudristek. (2022a). 6 Strategi IKM.

Kemdikbudristek. (2022b). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka.

Kemendikbud. (2022). Merdeka Belajar Episode 15: Kurikulum Merdeka dan Platform Merdeka Mengajar.

Keputusan Kepala BSKAP tentang Satuan Pendidikan Pelaksana Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Melalui Jalur Mandiri pada Tahun Ajaran 2022/2023 Tahap II, Pub. L. No. NOMOR 027/H/KR/2022 (2022).

Kneen, J., Breeze, T., Thayer, E., John, V., & Davies-Barnes, S. (2021). Pioneer teachers: How far can individual teachers achieve agency within curriculum development?. Journal of Educational Change

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation, 10(1), 2015.

OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: Curriculum analysis. 9h Informal Working Group (IWG) Meeting, 1–32.

Print, M. (2020). Curriculum development and design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Rusman. (2019). Manajemen kurikulum (2nd ed.). Rajagrafindo Persada.

Spillane, J. P. (2005). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy.

Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.

Steiner-Khamsi, G. gs columbia edu. (2014). Comparison and context: The interdisciplinary approach to the comparative study of education. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 16(2), 34–42.

Tikkanen, L., Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Pietarinen, J. (2017). Primary determinants of a large-scale curriculum reform: National board administrators’ perspectives. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(6), 702–716.

Viennet, R., & Pont, B. (2017). Education policy implementation: A literature review and proposed framework. OECD Education Working Papers, 162(December), 63.

Wilcox, K. C., Lawson, H. A., & Angelis, J. I. (2017). Innovation in odds-beating schools: Exemplars for getting better at getting better.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v20i1.53644